[#87773] timer thread [was Re: [ruby-alerts:7905] failure alert on trunk-asserts@silicon-docker (NG (r63844))] — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
> test_all <main>: warning: pthread_create failed for timer: Resource temporarily unavailable, scheduling broken
3 messages
2018/07/04
[#87836] [Ruby trunk Bug#14898] test/lib/test/unit/parallel.rb: TestSocket#test_timestamp stuck sometimes — ko1@...
Issue #14898 has been reported by ko1 (Koichi Sasada).
5 messages
2018/07/06
[#87838] Re: [Ruby trunk Bug#14898] test/lib/test/unit/parallel.rb: TestSocket#test_timestamp stuck sometimes
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2018/07/06
[email protected] wrote:
[#87842] Re: [Ruby trunk Bug#14898] test/lib/test/unit/parallel.rb: TestSocket#test_timestamp stuck sometimes
— Koichi Sasada <ko1@...>
2018/07/07
On 2018/07/06 18:47, Eric Wong wrote:
[#87847] undefined symbol: mjit_init_p — Leam Hall <leamhall@...>
I pulled Ruby trunk on 3 Jul and am now getting errors similar to the
10 messages
2018/07/07
[#87849] Re: undefined symbol: mjit_init_p
— Takashi Kokubun <takashikkbn@...>
2018/07/07
QXMgSSB0b2xkIHlvdSwgYG1ha2UgaW5zdGFsbGAgaXMgbmVlZGVkIHRvIG1ha2UgUnVieSB3b3Jr
[#87852] Re: undefined symbol: mjit_init_p
— Benoit Daloze <eregontp@...>
2018/07/07
T25lIG1vcmUgcmVhc29uIGZvciBodHRwczovL2J1Z3MucnVieS1sYW5nLm9yZy9pc3N1ZXMvMTM2
[#87986] [Ruby trunk Feature#14915] Deprecate String#crypt, move implementation to string/crypt — mame@...
Issue #14915 has been updated by mame (Yusuke Endoh).
5 messages
2018/07/18
[#87987] Re: [Ruby trunk Feature#14915] Deprecate String#crypt, move implementation to string/crypt
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2018/07/18
[email protected] wrote:
[#88000] Re: [Ruby trunk Feature#14915] Deprecate String#crypt, move implementation to string/crypt
— "Urabe, Shyouhei" <shyouhei@...>
2018/07/19
normalperson (Eric Wong) wrote:
[#88088] [Ruby trunk Misc#14937] [PATCH] thread_pthread: lazy-spawn timer-thread only on contention — normalperson@...
Issue #14937 has been reported by normalperson (Eric Wong).
9 messages
2018/07/24
[#88104] [Ruby trunk Bug#14898] test/lib/test/unit/parallel.rb: TestSocket#test_timestamp stuck sometimes — ko1@...
Issue #14898 has been updated by ko1 (Koichi Sasada).
3 messages
2018/07/25
[#88173] [Ruby trunk Bug#14950] r64109 thread.c: move ppoll wrapper before thread_pthread.c - Windows compile failure - thread.c — Greg.mpls@...
Issue #14950 has been reported by MSP-Greg (Greg L).
3 messages
2018/07/29
[#88189] [Ruby trunk Bug#14950] r64109 thread.c: move ppoll wrapper before thread_pthread.c - Windows compile failure - thread.c — nobu@...
Issue #14950 has been updated by nobu (Nobuyoshi Nakada).
3 messages
2018/07/30
[#88199] [Ruby trunk Misc#14937] [PATCH] thread_pthread: lazy-spawn timer-thread only on contention — takashikkbn@...
Issue #14937 has been updated by k0kubun (Takashi Kokubun).
7 messages
2018/07/30
[#88213] Re: [Ruby trunk Misc#14937] [PATCH] thread_pthread: lazy-spawn timer-thread only on contention
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2018/07/30
[email protected] wrote:
[#88219] Re: [Ruby trunk Misc#14937] [PATCH] thread_pthread: lazy-spawn timer-thread only on contention
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2018/07/30
> yet, sky3 had a failure at
[#88306] Re: [Ruby trunk Misc#14937] [PATCH] thread_pthread: lazy-spawn timer-thread only on contention
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2018/08/06
> http://ci.rvm.jp/results/trunk@P895/1173951
[#88308] Re: [Ruby trunk Misc#14937] [PATCH] thread_pthread: lazy-spawn timer-thread only on contention
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2018/08/06
> > http://ci.rvm.jp/results/trunk@P895/1173951
[ruby-core:88234] [Ruby trunk Feature#14951] New operator to evaluate truthy/falsy/logical equivalence
From:
nobu@...
Date:
2018-07-31 17:10:44 UTC
List:
ruby-core #88234
Issue #14951 has been updated by nobu (Nobuyoshi Nakada). danga (Dan Garubba) wrote: > Sure. In my day job, I write testing code. So I've written an expression like: > > ~~~ ruby > raise MyError unless in_scenario_x? == actions_performed_for_scenario_x? > ~~~ > > To express: "raise an error unless the actions are performed for scenario X if and only if we are in scenario X". The code and the explanation differ. If the former is correct, the latter should be: "raise an error unless the actions are performed for scenario X and we are in scenario X, or the actions aren't performed for scenario X and we aren't in scenario X". If the latter is correct, the former should be: ~~~ruby raise MyError unless in_scenario_x? && actions_performed_for_scenario_x? ~~~ ---------------------------------------- Feature #14951: New operator to evaluate truthy/falsy/logical equivalence https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/14951#change-73257 * Author: danga (Dan Garubba) * Status: Open * Priority: Normal * Assignee: * Target version: ---------------------------------------- I propose adding a new operator for truthy/falsy equivalence, similar to what was proposed on https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/13067, but with new syntax. The main purpose would be for writing expressions for logical equivalence (i.e., "if and only if" relationships) that only considers the truthiness the operands. Since predicate methods like `File#size?` and operators like `=~` follow truthy semantics without returning the `true` and `false` singletons, using them in logical expressions that evaluate for logical equivalence can be error-prone without the proper return type awareness and conversions. This proposed operator would be equivalent to `!!a == !!b`, but I feel that a new operator would be more concise and more expressive of the concept of logical equivalence. Attached is a prototype implementation of the operator as '=?'. ---Files-------------------------------- teq.patch (3.47 KB) -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/ Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe> <http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>