On Wed, 20 Jan 2016, Pavel Kouřil wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 8:04 PM, Derick Rethans <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > I've decided to re-propose the CoC RFC. There are many reasons for it,
> > but there are a few points I want to make.
>
> if you still insists on some CoC, maybe you could at least look into
> something else than the "Contributor Covenant"?
>
> For example, http://code-of-merit.org/ seems much more
> reasonable in
> "getting the things done" than the Covenant.
Sure - I would very much appreciate a list of things to look at. Would
you have time to suggest a list with C of C's? It is unlikely that one
will cover it all anyway. Something that (stolen the idea from twitter)
has a good list of *positive* core values is also in my opinion
important to have.
cheers,
Derick