12.12.

2014 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 356/1

II

(Non-legislative acts)

REGULATIONS

COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No 1299/2014

of 18 November 2014
on the technical specifications for interoperability relating to the ‘infrastructure’ subsystem of the
rail system in the European Union

(Text with EEA relevance)

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Directive 2008/57/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 June 2008 on the intero­
perability of the rail system within the Community (1), and in particular Article 6(1) thereof,

Whereas:

(1) Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 881/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council (2) requires the Euro­
pean Railway Agency (the Agency) to ensure that the technical specifications for interoperability (the TSIs) are
adapted to technical progress, market trends and social requirements and to propose to the Commission the
amendments to the TSIs which it considers necessary.

(2) By Decision C(2010) 2576 of 29 April 2010, the Commission gave the Agency a mandate to develop and review
the TSIs with a view to extending their scope to the whole rail system in the Union. Under the terms of that
mandate, the Agency was requested to extend the scope of the TSI relating to the subsystem ‘infrastructure’, to
the whole rail system in the Union.

(3) On 21 December 2012, the Agency issued a recommendation on amendments to the TSI relating to the
subsystem ‘infrastructure’ (ERA/REC/10-2012/INT).

(4) In order to keep pace with technological progress and encourage modernisation, innovative solutions should be
promoted and their implementation should, under certain conditions, be allowed. Where an innovative solution
is proposed, the manufacturer or his authorised representative should state how it deviates from or how it
complements to the relevant section of the TSI, and the innovative solution should be assessed by the Commis­
sion. If this assessment is positive, the Agency should devise the appropriate functional and interface specifica­
tions of the innovative solution and develop the relevant assessment methods.

(5) The TSI infrastructure established by this Regulation does not deal with all essential requirements. In accordance
with Article 5(6) of Directive 2008/57/EC, technical aspects which are not covered by it should be identified as
‘open points’ governed by national rules applicable in each Member State.

(6) In accordance with Article 17(3) of Directive 2008/57/EC, Member States are to notify to the Commission and
other Member States the conformity assessment and verification procedures to be used for the specific cases as
well as the bodies responsible for carrying out these procedures. The same obligation should be provided as
regards to open points.

(1) OJ L 191, 18.7.2008, p. 1.

(2) Regulation (EC) No 881/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 establishing a European Railway Agency
(OJ L 164, 30.4.2004, p. 1).
L 356/2 EN Official Journal of the European Union 12.12.2014

(7) Rail traffic currently operates under existing national, bilateral, multinational or international agreements. It is im­
portant that these agreements do not hinder current and future progress towards interoperability. The Member
States should therefore notify such agreements to the Commission.

(8) In accordance with Article 11(5) of Directive 2008/57/EC, the TSI on infrastructure should allow, for a limited
period of time, for interoperability constituents to be incorporated into subsystems without certification if certain
conditions are met.

(9) Commission Decisions 2008/217/EC (1) and 2011/275/EU (2) should therefore be repealed.

(10) In order to prevent unnecessary additional costs and administrative burden, Decisions 2008/217/EC and
2011/275/EU should continue to apply after their repeal to the subsystems and projects referred to in
Article 9(1)(a) of Directive 2008/57/EC.

(11) The measures provided for in this Regulation are in conformity with the opinion of the Committee established in
accordance with Article 29(1) of Directive 2008/57/EC,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Subject matter

The technical specification for interoperability (TSI) relating to the ‘infrastructure’ subsystem of the rail system in the
entire European Union, as set out in the Annex, is hereby adopted.

Article 2

Scope

1. The TSI shall apply to all new, upgraded or renewed ‘infrastructure’ of the rail system in the European Union as
defined in point 2.1 of Annex I to Directive 2008/57/EC.

2. Without prejudice to Articles 7 and 8 and point 7.2 of the Annex, the TSI shall apply to new railway lines in the
European Union, which are placed in service from 1 January 2015.

3. The TSI shall not apply to existing infrastructure of the rail system in the European Union, which is already placed
in service on all or part of the network of any Member State on 1 January 2015, except when it is subject to renewal or
upgrading in accordance with Article 20 of Directive 2008/57/EC and Section 7.3 of the Annex.

4. The TSI shall apply to the following networks:

(a) the trans-European conventional rail system network as defined in Annex I, point 1.1 to Directive 2008/57/EC;

(b) the trans-European high-speed rail system network (TEN) as defined in Annex I, point 2.1 to Directive 2008/57/EC;

(c) other parts of the network of the rail system in the Union;

and excludes the cases referred to in Article 1(3) of Directive 2008/57/EC.

(1) Commission Decision 2008/217/EC of 20 December 2007 concerning a TSI relating to the infrastructure sub-system of the trans-Euro­
pean high-speed rail system (OJ L 77, 19.3.2008, p. 1).
(2) Commission Decision 2011/275/EU of 26 April 2011 concerning a TSI relating to the infrastructure sub-system of the trans-European
conventional rail system (OJ L 126, 14.5.2011, p. 53).
12.12.2014 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 356/3

5. The TSI shall apply to networks with the following nominal track gauges: 1 435 mm, 1 520 mm, 1 524 mm,
1 600 mm and 1 668 mm.

6. Metric gauge is excluded from the technical scope of this TSI.

7. The technical and geographical scope of this Regulation is set out in Sections 1.1 and 1.2 of the Annex.

Article 3

Open points

1. With regard to the issues classified as ‘open points’ set out in Appendix R of the TSI, the conditions to be complied
with for verifying the interoperability pursuant to Article 17(2) of Directive 2008/57/EC shall be the national rules
applicable in the Member State which authorises the placing in service of the subsystem covered by this Regulation.

2. Within six months of the entry into force of this Regulation, each Member State shall send to the other Member
States and the Commission of the following information, unless such information has already been sent to them under
Decisions 2008/217/EC or 2011/275/EU:

(a) the national rules referred to in paragraph 1;

(b) the conformity assessment and verification procedures to be carried out to apply the national rules referred to in
paragraph 1;

(c) the bodies designated in accordance with Article 17(3) of Directive 2008/57/EC to carry out the conformity assess­
ment and verification procedures with respect to the open points.

Article 4

Specific cases

1. With regard to specific cases referred to in point 7.7 of the Annex to this Regulation, the conditions to be met for
the verification of interoperability pursuant to Article 17(2) of Directive 2008/57/EC shall be the national rules applic­
able in the Member State which authorises the placing in service of the subsystem covered by this Regulation.

2. Within six months of the entry into force of this Regulation, each Member State shall notify to the other Member
States and the Commission the following information:

(a) the national rules referred to in paragraph 1;

(b) the conformity assessment and verification procedures to be carried out to apply the national rules referred to in
paragraph 1;

(c) the bodies designated in accordance with Article 17(3) of Directive 2008/57/EC to carry out the conformity assess­
ment and verification procedures in the specific cases set out in point 7.7 of the Annex.

Article 5

Notification of bilateral agreements

1. Member States shall notify the Commission, not later than 1 July 2015, any existing national, bilateral, multilateral
or international agreements between Member States and railway undertaking(s), infrastructure managers or non-member
countries which are required by the very specific or local nature of the intended rail service or which deliver significant
levels of local or regional interoperability.
L 356/4 EN Official Journal of the European Union 12.12.2014

2. That obligation does not apply to agreements which have already been notified under Decision 2008/217/EC.

3. Member States shall forthwith notify to the Commission of any future agreements or amendments to existing
agreements.

Article 6

Projects at an advanced stage of development

In accordance with Article 9(3) of Directive 2008/57/EC, each Member State shall communicate to the Commission
within one year of the entry into force of this Regulation the list of projects being implemented within its territory and
are at an advanced stage of development.

Article 7

‘EC’ certificate of verification

1. An ‘EC’ certificate of verification for a subsystem that contains interoperability constituents which do not have an
‘EC’ declaration of conformity or suitability for use, may be issued during a transitional period ending on 31 May 2021
provided that the requirements laid down in point 6.5 of the Annex are met.

2. The production, upgrade or renewal of the subsystem with use of the non-certified interoperability constituents
shall be completed within the transitional period set out in paragraph 1, including its placing in service.

3. During the transitional period set out in paragraph 1:

(a) the reasons for non-certification of any interoperability constituents shall be properly identified by the notified body
before granting the ‘EC’ certificate pursuant to Article 18 of Directive 2008/57/EC;

(b) the national safety authorities, pursuant to Article 16(2)(c) of Directive 2004/49/EC of the European Parliament and
of the Council (1), shall report on the use of non-certified interoperability constituents in the context of authorisation
procedures in their annual report referred to in Article 18 of Directive 2004/49/EC.

4. From 1 January 2016, newly produced interoperability constituents shall be covered by the EC declaration of con­
formity or suitability for use.

Article 8

Conformity assessment

1. The procedures for assessment of conformity, suitability for use and ‘EC’ verification set out in section 6 of the
Annex shall be based on the modules established in Commission Decision 2010/713/EU (2).

2. The type or design examination certificate of interoperability constituents shall be valid for a seven year period.
During that period, new constituents of the same type are permitted to be placed into service without a new conformity
assessment.

3. Certificates referred to in paragraph 2 which have been issued according to the requirements of Decision
2011/275/EU [TSI INF CR] or Decision 2008/217/EC [TSI INF HS] remain valid, without a need for a new conformity
assessment, until the expiry date originally established. In order to renew a certificate the design or type shall be re-
assessed only against new or modified requirements set out in the Annex to this Regulation.

(1) Directive 2004/49/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on safety on the Community's railways and
amending Council Directive 95/18/EC on the licensing of railway undertakings and Directive 2001/14/EC on the allocation of railway
infrastructure capacity and the levying of charges for the use of railway infrastructure and safety certification (Railway Safety Directive)
(OJ L 164, 30.4.2004, p. 44).
(2) Commission Decision 2010/713/EU of 9 November 2010 on modules for the procedures for assessment of conformity, suitability for
use and EC verification to be used in the technical specifications for interoperability adopted under Directive 2008/57/EC of the Euro­
pean Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 319, 4.12.2010, p. 1.)
12.12.2014 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 356/5

Article 9

Implementation

1. Section 7 of the Annex sets out the steps to be followed for the implementation of a fully interoperable infrastruc­
ture subsystem.

Without prejudice to Article 20 of Directive 2008/57/EC, Member States shall prepare a national implementation plan,
describing their actions to comply with this TSI, in accordance with section 7 of the Annex. Member States shall send
their national implementation plan to the other Member States and the Commission by 31 December 2015. Member
States that have already sent their implementation plan do not have to send it again.

2. Pursuant to Article 20 of Directive 2008/57/EC, when a new authorisation is required and if the TSI is not fully
applied, Member States shall notify the following information to the Commission:

(a) the reason why the TSI is not fully applied;

(b) the technical characteristics applicable instead of the TSI;

(c) the bodies responsible for applying the verification procedure referred to in Article 18 of the Directive 2008/57/EC.

3. Member States shall send to the Commission a report on the implementation of Article 20 of Directive
2008/57/EC three years after 1 January 2015. This report shall be discussed in the Committee set up by Article 29 of
Directive 2008/57/EC and, where appropriate, the TSI in the Annex shall be adapted.

Article 10

Innovative solutions

1. In order to keep pace with technological progress, innovative solutions may be required, which do not comply
with the specifications set out in the Annex or for which the assessment methods set out in the Annex cannot be
applied.

2. Innovative solutions may relate to the infrastructure subsystem, its parts and its interoperability constituents.

3. If an innovative solution is proposed, the manufacturer or his authorised representative established within the
Union shall declare how it deviates from or complements to the relevant provisions of this TSI and submit the deviations
to the Commission for analysis. The Commission may request the opinion of the Agency on the proposed innovative
solution.

4. The Commission shall deliver an opinion on the proposed innovative solution. If this opinion is positive, the
appropriate functional and interface specifications and the assessment method, which need to be included in the TSI in
order to allow the use of this innovative solution, shall be developed and subsequently integrated in the TSI during the
revision process pursuant to Article 6 of Directive 2008/57/EC. If the opinion is negative, the innovative solution
proposed cannot be used.

5. Pending the review of the TSI, the positive opinion delivered by the Commission shall be considered as an accept­
able means of compliance with the essential requirements of Directive 2008/57/EC and may be used for the assessment
of the subsystem.

Article 11

Repeal

Decisions 2008/217/EC and 2011/275/EU are repealed with effect from 1 January 2015.

They shall however continue to apply to:

(a) subsystems authorised in accordance with those Decisions;

(b) projects for new, renewed or upgraded subsystems which, at the date of publication of this Regulation, are at an
advanced stage of development or are the subject of an on-going contract.
L 356/6 EN Official Journal of the European Union 12.12.2014

Article 12

Entry into force

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the
European Union.

It shall apply from 1 January 2015. However, an authorisation for placing in service may be granted in accordance with
the TSI as set out in the Annex to this Regulation before 1 January 2015.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 18 November 2014.

For the Commission

The President
Jean-Claude JUNCKER
12.12.2014 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 356/7

ANNEX

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 11

1.1. Technical Scope .................................................................................................................. 11

1.2. Geographical Scope ............................................................................................................. 11

1.3. Content of this TSI .............................................................................................................. 11

2. Definition and scope of subsystem .......................................................................................... 11

2.1. Definition of the infrastructure subsystem ................................................................................. 11

2.2. Interfaces of this TSI with other TSIs ....................................................................................... 12

2.3. Interfaces of this TSI with the Persons with Reduced Mobility TSI .................................................. 12

2.4. Interfaces of this TSI with the Safety in Railway Tunnels TSI ......................................................... 12

2.5. Relation to the safety management system ................................................................................ 12

3. Essential requirements .......................................................................................................... 12

4. Description of the infrastructure subsystem ............................................................................... 15

4.1. Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 15

4.2. Functional and technical specifications of subsystem ................................................................... 16

4.2.1. TSI Categories of Line .......................................................................................................... 16

4.2.2. Basic parameters characterising the infrastructure subsystem ......................................................... 18

4.2.3. Line layout ......................................................................................................................... 20

4.2.4. Track parameters ................................................................................................................. 22

4.2.5. Switches and crossings ......................................................................................................... 27

4.2.6. Track resistance to applied loads ............................................................................................. 27

4.2.7. Structures resistance to traffic loads ......................................................................................... 28

4.2.8. Immediate action limits on track geometry defects ...................................................................... 30

4.2.9. Platforms ........................................................................................................................... 33

4.2.10. Health, safety and environment .............................................................................................. 34

4.2.11. Provision for operation ......................................................................................................... 35

4.2.12. Fixed installations for servicing trains ....................................................................................... 36

4.3. Functional and technical specification of the interfaces ................................................................ 36

4.3.1. Interfaces with the rolling stock subsystem ................................................................................ 37

4.3.2. Interfaces with the energy subsystem ....................................................................................... 39

4.3.3. Interfaces with the control command and signalling subsystem ..................................................... 39

4.3.4. Interfaces with the operation and traffic management subsystem ................................................... 40

4.4. Operating rules ................................................................................................................... 40

L 356/8 EN Official Journal of the European Union 12.12.2014

4.5. Maintenance rules ............................................................................................................... 40

4.5.1. Maintenance file .................................................................................................................. 40

4.5.2. Maintenance plan ................................................................................................................ 41

4.6. Professional qualifications ..................................................................................................... 41

4.7. Health and safety conditions .................................................................................................. 41

5. Interoperability constituents ................................................................................................... 41

5.1. Basis on which interoperability constituents have been selected ..................................................... 41

5.2. List of constituents .............................................................................................................. 41

5.3. Constituents performances and specifications ............................................................................ 41

5.3.1. The rail ............................................................................................................................. 41

5.3.2. The rail fastening systems ...................................................................................................... 42

5.3.3. Track sleepers ..................................................................................................................... 42

6. Assessment of conformity of interoperability constituents and EC verification of the subsystems ........... 42

6.1. Interoperability Constituents .................................................................................................. 42

6.1.1. Conformity assessment procedures .......................................................................................... 42

6.1.2. Application of modules ........................................................................................................ 43

6.1.3. Innovative solutions for interoperability constituents ................................................................... 43

6.1.4. EC declaration of conformity for interoperability constituents ....................................................... 43

6.1.5. Particular assessment procedures for interoperability constituents ................................................... 44

6.2. Infrastructure subsystem ....................................................................................................... 44

6.2.1. General provisions ............................................................................................................... 44

6.2.2. Application of modules ........................................................................................................ 45

6.2.3. Innovative solutions ............................................................................................................. 45

6.2.4. Particular assessment procedures for infrastructure subsystem ....................................................... 45

6.2.5. Technical solutions giving presumption of conformity at design stage ............................................. 48

6.3. EC Verification when speed is used as a migration criterion .......................................................... 49

6.4. Assessment of maintenance file .............................................................................................. 49

6.5. Subsystems containing Interoperability constituents not holding an EC declaration ............................ 49

6.5.1. Conditions ......................................................................................................................... 49

6.5.2. Documentation ................................................................................................................... 50

6.5.3. Maintenance of the subsystems certified according to 6.5.1. .......................................................... 50

6.6. Subsystem containing serviceable interoperability constituents that are suitable for reuse ..................... 50

6.6.1. Conditions ......................................................................................................................... 50

6.6.2. Documentation ................................................................................................................... 50

6.6.3. Use of serviceable interoperability constituents in maintenance ...................................................... 51

12.12.2014 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 356/9

7. Implementation of the infrastructure TSI .................................................................................. 51

7.1. Application of this TSI to railway lines ..................................................................................... 51

7.2. Application of this TSI to new railway lines .............................................................................. 51

7.3. Application of this TSI to existing railway lines .......................................................................... 51

7.3.1. Upgrading of a line .............................................................................................................. 51

7.3.2. Renewal of a line ................................................................................................................ 52

7.3.3. Substitution in the framework of maintenance ........................................................................... 52

7.3.4. Existing lines that are not subject to a renewal or upgrading project ............................................... 52

7.4. Application of this TSI to existing platforms ............................................................................. 53

7.5. Speed as an implementation criterion ...................................................................................... 53

7.6. Ascertain Compatibility of infrastructure and rolling stock after authorisation of rolling stock .............. 53

7.7. Specific cases ..................................................................................................................... 53

7.7.1. Particular features on the Austrian network ............................................................................... 53

7.7.2. Particular features on the Belgian network ................................................................................ 54

7.7.3. Particular features on the Bulgarian network ............................................................................. 54

7.7.4. Particular features on the Danish network ................................................................................. 54

7.7.5. Particular features on the Estonian network ............................................................................... 54

7.7.6. Particular features on the Finnish network ................................................................................ 55

7.7.7. Particular features on the French network ................................................................................. 58

7.7.8. Particular features on the German network ............................................................................... 58

7.7.9. Particular features on the Hellenic network ............................................................................... 58

7.7.10. Particular features on the Italian network .................................................................................. 58

7.7.11. Particular features on the Latvian network ................................................................................ 59

7.7.12. Particular features on the Polish network .................................................................................. 60

7.7.13. Particular features on the Portuguese network ............................................................................ 62

7.7.14. Particular features on the Ireland network ................................................................................. 64

7.7.15. Particular features on the Spanish network ................................................................................ 65

7.7.16. Particular features on the Swedish network ............................................................................... 68

7.7.17. Particular features on the UK network for Great Britain ............................................................... 68

7.7.18. Particular features on the UK network for Northern Ireland .......................................................... 70

7.7.19. Particular features on the Slovak network ................................................................................. 70

L 356/10 EN Official Journal of the European Union 12.12.2014

Appendix A — Assessment of interoperability constituents ...................................................................... 75

Appendix B — Assessment of the infrastructure subsystem ...................................................................... 76
Appendix C — Technical characteristics of track design and switches and crossings design .............................. 79
Appendix D — Conditions of use of track design and switches and crossings design ...................................... 81
Appendix E — Capability requirements for structures according to traffic code ............................................ 82
Appendix F — Capability requirements for structures according to traffic code in the United Kingdom of Great
Britain and Northern Ireland ......................................................................................... 84
Appendix G — Speed conversion to miles per hour for Ireland and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and
Northern Ireland ........................................................................................................ 86
Appendix H — Structure gauge for the 1 520 mm track gauge system ....................................................... 87
Appendix I — Reverse curves with radii in the range from 150 m up to 300 m .......................................... 89
Appendix J — Safety assurance over fixed obtuse crossings ..................................................................... 91
Appendix K — Basis of minimum requirements for structures for passenger coaches and multiple units ............ 95
Appendix L — Definition of EN line category a12 for traffic code P6 ........................................................ 96
Appendix M — Specific case on the Estonian network ............................................................................. 97
Appendix N — Specific cases of the Hellenic network ............................................................................. 97
Appendix O — Specific case on the Ireland and United Kingdom of Northern Ireland networks ....................... 97
Appendix P — Structure gauge for the lower parts for the 1 668 mm track gauge on the Spanish network ........ 98
Appendix Q — National technical rules for UK-GB Specific Cases .............................................................. 100
Appendix R — List of open points ..................................................................................................... 101
Appendix S — Glossary ................................................................................................................... 102
Appendix T — List of referenced standards .......................................................................................... 108
12.12.2014 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 356/11

1. INTRODUCTION

1.1. Technical Scope

This TSI concerns the infrastructure subsystem and part of the maintenance subsystem of the Union rail
system in accordance with Article 1 of Directive 2008/57/EC.

The infrastructure subsystem is defined in Annex II (2.1) to Directive 2008/57/EC.

The technical scope of this TSI is further defined in Article 2(1), 2(5) and 2(6) of this Regulation.

1.2. Geographical Scope

The geographical scope of this TSI is defined in Article 2(4) of this Regulation.

1.3. Content of this TSI

(1) In accordance with Article 5(3) of Directive 2008/57/EC, this TSI:

(a) indicates its intended scope (section 2);

(b) lays down essential requirements for the infrastructure subsystem (section 3);

(c) establishes the functional and technical specifications to be met by the subsystem and its interfaces
vis-à-vis other subsystems (section 4);

(d) specifies the interoperability constituents and interfaces which must be covered by European specifi­
cations, including European standards, which are necessary to achieve interoperability within the
Union rail system (section 5);

(e) states, in each case under consideration, which procedures are to be used in order to assess the con­
formity or the suitability for use of the interoperability constituents, on the one hand, or the EC
verification of the subsystems, on the other hand (section 6);

(f) indicates the strategy for implementing this TSI (section 7);

(g) indicates, for the staff concerned, the professional qualifications and health and safety conditions at
work required for the operation and maintenance of the subsystem, as well as for the implementa­
tion of this TSI (section 4).

In accordance with Article 5(5) of the Directive 2008/57/EC, provisions for specific cases are indicated
in section 7.

(2) Requirements in this TSI are valid for all track gauge systems within the scope of this TSI, unless a para­
graph refers to specific track gauge systems or to specific nominal track gauges.

2. DEFINITION AND SCOPE OF SUBSYSTEM

2.1. Definition of the infrastructure subsystem

This TSI covers:

(a) the infrastructure structural subsystem

(b) the part of the maintenance functional subsystem relating to the infrastructure subsystem (that is:
washing plants for external cleaning of trains, water restocking, refuelling, fixed installations for toilet
discharge and electrical shore supplies).

The elements of the infrastructure subsystem are described in Annex II (2.1. Infrastructure) to Directive
2008/57/EC.

The scope of this TSI therefore includes the following aspects of the infrastructure subsystem:

(a) Line layout,

(b) Track parameters,

L 356/12 EN Official Journal of the European Union 12.12.2014

(c) Switches and crossings,

(d) Track resistance to applied loads,
(e) Structures resistance to traffic loads,
(f) Immediate action limits on track geometry defects,
(g) Platforms,
(h) Health, safety and environment,
(i) Provision for operation,
(j) Fixed installations for servicing trains.
Further details are set out in point 4.2.2 of this TSI.

2.2. Interfaces of this TSI with other TSIs

Point 4.3 of this TSI sets out the functional and technical specification of the interfaces with the following
subsystems, as defined in the relevant TSIs:
(a) Rolling stock subsystem,
(b) Energy subsystem,
(c) Control command and signalling subsystem,
(d) Traffic operation and management subsystem.
Interfaces with the Persons with Reduced Mobility TSI (PRM TSI) are described in point 2.3 below.

Interfaces with the Safety in Railway Tunnels TSI (SRT TSI) are described in point 2.4 below.

2.3. Interfaces of this TSI with the Persons with Reduced Mobility TSI
All requirements relating to the infrastructure subsystem for the access of persons with reduced mobility to
the railway system are set out in the Persons with Reduced Mobility TSI.

2.4. Interfaces of this TSI with the Safety in Railway Tunnels TSI
All requirements relating to the infrastructure subsystem for safety in railway tunnels are set out in the
Safety in Railway Tunnels TSI.

2.5. Relation to the safety management system

Necessary processes to manage safety according to the requirements in the scope of this TSI, including
interfaces to humans, organisations or other technical systems, shall be designed and implemented in the
infrastructure manager's safety management system as required by Directive 2004/49/EC.

3. ESSENTIAL REQUIREMENTS

The following table indicates basic parameters of this TSI and their correspondence to the essential require­
ments as set out and numbered in Annex III to Directive 2008/57/EC.

Table 1
Basic Parameters of the infrastructure subsystem corresponding to the essential requirements

Environ­ Technical
Reliability Accessi­
TSI point Title of TSI point Safety Health mental compa­
Availability bility
protection tibility

[Link] Structure gauge 1.1.1, 1.5

2.1.1

[Link] Distance between 1.1.1, 1.5

track centres 2.1.1
12.12.2014 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 356/13

Environ­ Technical
Reliability Accessi­
TSI point Title of TSI point Safety Health mental compa­
Availability bility
protection tibility

[Link] Maximum gradients 1.1.1 1.5

[Link] Minimum radius of 1.1.3 1.5

horizontal curve

[Link] Minimum radius of 1.1.3 1.5

vertical curve

[Link] Nominal track gauge 1.5

[Link] Cant 1.1.1, 1.5 1.6.1

2.1.1

[Link] Cant deficiency 1.1.1 1.5

[Link] Abrupt change of cant 2.1.1

deficiency

[Link] Equivalent conicity 1.1.1, 1.5

1.1.2

[Link] Railhead profile for 1.1.1, 1.5

plain line 1.1.2

[Link] Rail inclination 1.1.1, 1.5

1.1.2

[Link] Design geometry of 1.1.1, 1.5

switches and crossings 1.1.2,
1.1.3

[Link] Use of swing nose 1.1.2,

crossings 1.1.3

[Link] Maximum unguided 1.1.1, 1.5

length of fixed obtuse 1.1.2
crossings

[Link] Track resistance to 1.1.1, 1.5

vertical loads 1.1.2,
1.1.3

[Link] Longitudinal track 1.1.1, 1.5

resistance 1.1.2,
1.1.3

[Link] Lateral track resistance 1.1.1, 1.5

1.1.2,
1.1.3

[Link] Resistance of new 1.1.1, 1.5

bridges to traffic loads 1.1.3

[Link] Equivalent vertical 1.1.1, 1.5

loading for new earth­ 1.1.3
works and earth pres­
sure effects imposed
on new structures
L 356/14 EN Official Journal of the European Union 12.12.2014

Environ­ Technical
Reliability Accessi­
TSI point Title of TSI point Safety Health mental compa­
Availability bility
protection tibility

[Link] Resistance of new 1.1.1, 1.5

structures over or 1.1.3
adjacent to tracks

[Link] Resistance of existing 1.1.1, 1.5

bridges and earth­ 1.1.3
works to traffic loads

[Link] The immediate action 1.1.1, 1.2

limit for alignment 1.1.2

[Link] The immediate action 1.1.1, 1.2

limit for longitudinal 1.1.2
level

[Link] The immediate action 1.1.1, 1.2

limit for track twist 1.1.2

[Link] The immediate action 1.1.1, 1.2

limit of track gauge as 1.1.2
isolated defect

[Link] The immediate action 1.1.1, 1.2

limit for cant 1.1.2

[Link] The immediate action 1.1.1, 1.2 1.5

limit for switches and 1.1.2
crossings

[Link] Usable length of plat­ 1.1.1, 1.5

forms 2.1.1

[Link] Platform height 1.1.1, 1.5 1.6.1

2.1.1

[Link] Platform offset 1.1.1, 1.5 1.6.1

2.1.1

[Link] Track layout alongside 1.1.1, 1.5 1.6.1

platforms 2.1.1

[Link] Maximum pressure 1.1.1, 1.5

variations in tunnels 2.1.1

[Link] Effect of cross winds 1.1.1, 1.2 1.5

2.1.1

[Link] Ballast pick-up 1.1.1 1.2 1.5

12.12.2014 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 356/15

Environ­ Technical
Reliability Accessi­
TSI point Title of TSI point Safety Health mental compa­
Availability bility
protection tibility

[Link] Location markers 1.1.1 1.2

[Link] Equivalent conicity in 1.1.1, 1.5

service 1.1.2

[Link] Toilet discharge 1.1.5 1.2 1.3.1 1.5

[Link] Train external cleaning 1.2 1.5

facilities

[Link] Water restocking 1.1.5 1.2 1.3.1 1.5

[Link] Refuelling 1.1.5 1.2 1.3.1 1.5

[Link] Electric shore supply 1.1.5 1.2 1.5

4.4 Operating rules 1.2

4.5 Maintenance rules 1.2

4.6 Professional qualifica­ 1.1.5 1.2

tions

4.7 Health and safety 1.1.5 1.2 1.3 1.4.1

conditions

4. DESCRIPTION OF THE INFRASTRUCTURE SUBSYSTEM

4.1. Introduction

(1) The Union rail system, to which Directive 2008/57/EC applies and of which the infrastructure and
maintenance subsystems are parts, is an integrated system whose consistency needs to be verified. This
consistency must be checked in particular with regard to the specifications of the infrastructure
subsystem, its interfaces in relation to the other subsystems of the Union rail system in which it is inte­
grated, as well as the operating and maintenance rules.

(2) The limiting values set out in this TSI are not intended to be imposed as usual design values. However
the design values must be within the limits set out in this TSI.

(3) The functional and technical specifications of the subsystem and its interfaces, described in points 4.2
and 4.3, do not impose the use of specific technologies or technical solutions, except where this is
strictly necessary for the interoperability of the Union rail system.

(4) Innovative solutions for interoperability which do not fulfil the requirements specified in this TSI and/
or which are not assessable as stated in this TSI require new specifications and/or new assessment
methods. In order to allow technological innovation, these specifications and assessment methods shall
be developed by the process for innovative solutions described in Article 10.
L 356/16 EN Official Journal of the European Union 12.12.2014

(5) Where reference is made to EN standards, any variations called ‘national deviations’ in the EN do not
apply, unless otherwise specified in this TSI.

(6) Where line speeds are stated in [km/h] as a category or performance parameter in this TSI, it shall be
allowed to translate the speed to equivalent [mph] as in Appendix G, for Ireland and for the United
Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland networks.

4.2. Functional and technical specifications of subsystem

4.2.1. TSI Categories of Line

(1) Annex I to Directive 2008/57/EC recognises that the Union rail network may be subdivided into
different categories for the Trans-European conventional rail network (point 1.1), the Trans-European
high-speed rail network (point 2.1) and the extension of the scope (point 4.1). In order to deliver
interoperability cost-effectively this TSI defines performance levels for ‘TSI categories of line’.

(2) These TSI categories of line shall be used for the classification of existing lines to define a target
system so that the relevant performance parameters will be met.

(3) The TSI category of line shall be a combination of traffic codes. For lines where only one type of
traffic is carried (for example a freight only line), a single code can be used to describe the require­
ments; where mixed traffic runs the category will be described by one or more codes for passenger
and freight. The combined traffic codes describe the envelope within which the desired mix of traffic
can be accommodated.

(4) For the purpose of TSI categorisation, lines are classified generically based on the type of traffic
(traffic code) characterised by the following performance parameters:

— gauge,

— axle load,

— line speed,

— train length

— usable length of platform.

The columns for ‘gauge’ and ‘axle load’ shall be treated as minimum requirements as they directly
control the trains that may run. The columns for ‘line speed’, ‘usable length of platform’ and ‘train
length’ are indicative of the range of values that are typically applied for different traffic types and
they do not directly impose restrictions on the traffic that may run over the line.

(5) The performance parameters listed in Table 2 and Table 3 are not intended to be used to directly ascer­
tain the compatibility between rolling stock and infrastructure.

(6) Information defining the relation between maximum axle load and maximum speed according to type
of vehicle is given in Appendix E and Appendix F.

(7) The performance levels for types of traffic are set out in Table 2 and Table 3 here-under.

Table 2

Performance parameters for passenger traffic

Usable length of
Traffic code Gauge Axle load [t] Line speed [km/h]
platform [m]

P1 GC 17 (*) 250-350 400

P2 GB 20 (*) 200-250 200-400

P3 DE3 22,5 (**) 120-200 200-400

12.12.2014 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 356/17

Usable length of
Traffic code Gauge Axle load [t] Line speed [km/h]
platform [m]

P4 GB 22,5 (**) 120-200 200-400

P5 GA 20 (**) 80-120 50-200

P6 G1 12 (**) n.a. n.a.

P1520 S 22,5 (**) 80-160 35-400

P1600 IRL1 22,5 (**) 80-160 75-240

(*) Axle load is based on design mass in working order for power heads (and for P2 locomotives) and operational
mass under normal payload for vehicles capable of carrying a payload of passengers or luggage as defined in
point 2.1 of EN 15663:2009+AC:2010. The corresponding ** axle load values for vehicles capable of carrying
a payload for passengers or luggage are 21,5 t for P1 and 22,5 t for P2 as defined in Appendix K to this TSI.
(**) Axle load is based on design mass in working order for power heads and locomotives as defined in point 2.1
of EN 15663:2009+AC:2010 and design mass under exceptional payload for other vehicles as defined in
Appendix K to this TSI.

Table 3

Performance parameters for freight traffic

Traffic code Gauge Axle load [t] Line speed [km/h] Train length [m]

F1 GC 22,5 (*) 100-120 740-1050

F2 GB 22,5 (*) 100-120 600-1050

F3 GA 20 (*) 60-100 500-1050

F4 G1 18 (*) n.a. n.a.

F1520 S 25 (*) 50-120 1050

F1600 IRL1 22,5 (*) 50-100 150-450

(*) Axle load is based on design mass in working order for power heads and locomotives as defined in point 2.1
of EN 15663:2009+AC:2010 and design mass under exceptional payload for other vehicles as defined in
Appendix K to this TSI.

(8) For structures, axle load by itself is not sufficient to define the requirements for infrastructure.
Requirements are specified for new structures in point [Link].1 and for existing structures in
point [Link].

(9) Passenger hubs, freight hubs and connecting lines are included in the above traffic codes, as
appropriate.

(10) Article 5(7) of Directive 2008/57/EC states:

‘The TSIs shall not be an impediment to decisions by the Member States concerning the use of infra­
structures for the movement of vehicles not covered by the TSIs.’

It is therefore allowed to design new and upgraded lines such that will also accommodate larger
gauges, higher axle loads, greater speeds, greater usable length of platform and longer trains than
those specified.
L 356/18 EN Official Journal of the European Union 12.12.2014

(11) Without prejudice to Section 7.6 and point [Link].2(3), when categorising a new line as P1, it shall
be ensured that ‘Class I’ trains, according to the HS RST TSI (Commission Decision 2008/232/EC (1)),
for a speed greater than 250 km/h, can run on that line up to the maximum speed.

(12) It is permissible for specific locations on the line to be designed for any or all of the performance
parameters line speed, usable length of platform and train length less than those set out in Table 2
and Table 3, where duly justified to meet geographical, urban or environmental constraints.

4.2.2. Basic parameters characterising the infrastructure subsystem

[Link]. L i s t of B as ic Pa ram eters

The Basic Parameters characterising the infrastructure subsystem, grouped according to the aspects listed in
point 2.1, are:

A. Line layout:

(a) Structure gauge ([Link]),

(b) Distance between track centres ([Link]),

(c) Maximum gradients ([Link]),

(d) Minimum radius of horizontal curve ([Link]),

(e) Minimum radius of vertical curve ([Link]),

B. Track parameters:

(a) Nominal track gauge ([Link]),

(b) Cant ([Link]),

(c) Cant deficiency ([Link]),

(d) Abrupt change of cant deficiency ([Link]),

(e) Equivalent conicity ([Link]),

(f) Railhead profile for plain line ([Link]),

(g) Rail inclination ([Link]),

C. Switches and crossings

(a) Design geometry of switches and crossings ([Link]),

(b) Use of swing nose crossings ([Link]),

(c) Maximum unguided length of fixed obtuse crossings ([Link]),

D. Track resistance to applied loads

(a) Track resistance to vertical loads ([Link]),

(b) Longitudinal track resistance ([Link]),

(c) Lateral track resistance ([Link]),

(1) Commission Decision 2008/232/EC of 21 February 2008 concerning a technical specification for interoperability relating to the rolling
stock sub-system of the trans-European high-speed rail system (OJ L 84, 26.3.2008, p. 132).
12.12.2014 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 356/19

E. Structures resistance to traffic loads

(a) Resistance of new bridges to traffic loads ([Link]),

(b) Equivalent vertical loading for new earthworks and earth pressure effects imposed on new structures
([Link]),

(c) Resistance of new structures over or adjacent to tracks ([Link]),

(d) Resistance of existing bridges and earthworks to traffic loads ([Link]),

F. Immediate action limits on track geometry defects

(a) The immediate action limit for alignment ([Link]),

(b) The immediate action limit for longitudinal level ([Link]),

(c) The immediate action limit for track twist ([Link]),

(d) The immediate action limit of track gauge as isolated defect ([Link]),

(e) The immediate action limit for cant ([Link]),

(f) The immediate action limits for switches and crossings ([Link]),

G. Platforms

(a) Usable length of platforms ([Link]),

(b) Platform height ([Link]),

(c) Platform offset ([Link]),

(d) Track layout alongside platforms ([Link]),

H. Health, safety and environment

(a) Maximum pressure variation in tunnels ([Link]),

(b) Effect of crosswinds ([Link]),

(c) Ballast pick-up ([Link])

I. Provision for operation

(a) Location markers ([Link]),

(b) Equivalent conicity in service ([Link])

J. Fixed installations for servicing trains

(a) General ([Link]),

(b) Toilet discharge ([Link]),

(c) Train external cleaning facilities ([Link]),

(d) Water restocking ([Link]),

(e) Refuelling ([Link]),

(f) Electric shore supply ([Link]),

L 356/20 EN Official Journal of the European Union 12.12.2014

K. Maintenance rules

(a) Maintenance file (4.5.1).

[Link]. R e qu ir em e n ts fo r B a s i c Para m ete rs

(1) These requirements are described in the following paragraphs, together with any particular conditions
that may be allowed in each case for the basic parameters and interfaces concerned.

(2) The values of basic parameters specified are only valid up to a maximum line speed of 350 km/h.

(3) For Ireland and for the United Kingdom in respect of Northern Ireland network the values of basic
parameters specified are only valid up to a maximum line speed of 165 km/h.

(4) In case of multi-rail track, requirements of this TSI are to be applied separately to each pair of rails
designed to be operated as separate track.

(5) Requirements for lines representing specific cases are described under point 7.7.

(6) A short section of track with devices to allow transition between different nominal track gauges is
allowed.

(7) Requirements are described for the subsystem under normal service conditions. Consequences, if any,
of the execution of works, which may require temporary exceptions as far as the subsystem perform­
ance is concerned, are dealt with in point 4.4.

(8) The performance levels of trains can be enhanced by adopting specific systems, such as vehicle body
tilting. Special conditions are allowed for running such trains, provided they do not entail restrictions
for other trains not equipped with such systems.

4.2.3. Line layout

[Link]. St r u c t u re g au g e

(1) The upper part of the structure gauge shall be set on the basis of the gauges selected according to
point 4.2.1. Those gauges are defined in Annex C and in Annex D, point D.4.8 of EN 15273-3:2013.

(2) The lower part of the structure gauge shall be GI2 as defined in Annex C of EN 15273-3:2013. Where
tracks are equipped with rail brakes, structure gauge GI1 as defined in Annex C of EN 15273-3:2013
shall apply for the lower part of the gauge.

(3) Calculations of the structure gauge shall be done using the kinematic method in accordance with the
requirements of sections 5, 7, 10 and the Annex C and Annex D, point D.4.8 of EN 15273-3:2013.

(4) Instead of points (1) to (3), for the 1 520 mm track gauge system, all traffic codes selected according to
point 4.2.1 are applied with the uniform structure gauge ‘S’ as defined in Appendix H to this TSI.

(5) Instead of points (1) to (3), for the 1 600 mm track gauge system, all traffic codes selected according to
point 4.2.1 are applied with the uniform structure gauge IRL1 as defined in Appendix O to this TSI.

[Link]. Dis t an c e b et we e n t ra ck ce n t re s

(1) The distance between track centres shall be set on the basis of the gauges selected according to
point 4.2.1.

(2) The nominal horizontal distance between track centres for new lines shall be specified for the design
and shall not be smaller than the values from the Table 4; it considers margins for aerodynamic effects.
12.12.2014 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 356/21

Table 4

Minimum nominal horizontal distance between track centres

Minimum nominal horizontal distance between track

Maximum allowed speed [km/h]
centres [m]

160 < v ≤ 200 3,80

200 < v ≤ 250 4,00

250 < v ≤ 300 4,20

v > 300 4,50

(3) The distance between track centres shall at least satisfy the requirements for the limit installation
distance between track centres, defined according section 9 of EN 15273-3:2013.

(4) Instead of points (1) to (3), for the 1 520 mm track gauge system, the nominal horizontal distance
between track centres shall be specified for the design and shall not be smaller than the values from the
Table 5; it considers margins for aerodynamic effects.

Table 5

Minimum nominal horizontal distance between track centres for the 1 520 mm track gauge
system

Minimum nominal horizontal distance between track

Maximum allowed speed [km/h]
centres [m]

v ≤ 160 4,10

160 < v ≤ 200 4,30

200 < v ≤ 250 4,50

v > 250 4,70

(5) Instead of point (2), for the 1 668 mm track gauge system, the nominal horizontal distance between
track centres for new lines shall be specified for the design and shall not be smaller than the values
from the Table 6, it considers margins for aerodynamic effects.

Table 6

Minimum nominal horizontal distance between track centres for the 1 668 mm track gauge
system

Minimum nominal horizontal distance between track

Maximum allowed speed [km/h]
centres [m]

160 < v ≤ 200 3,92

200 < v < 250 4,00

250 ≤ v ≤ 300 4,30

300 < v ≤ 350 4,50

L 356/22 EN Official Journal of the European Union 12.12.2014

(6) Instead of points (1) to (3), for the 1 600 mm track gauge system, the distance between track centres
shall be set on the basis of the gauges selected according to point 4.2.1. The nominal horizontal
distance between track centres shall be specified for the design and shall not be less than 3,57 m for
gauge IRL1; it considers margins for aerodynamic effects.

[Link]. M a xi m u m g r ad ie n ts

(1) Gradients of tracks through passenger platforms of new lines shall not be more than 2,5 mm/m, where
vehicles are intended to be regularly attached or detached.

(2) Gradients of new stabling tracks intended for parking rolling stock shall not be more than 2,5 mm/m
unless specific provision is made to prevent the rolling stock from running away.

(3) Gradients as steep as 35 mm/m are allowed for main tracks on new P1 lines dedicated to passenger
traffic at the design phase provided the following ‘envelope’ requirements are observed:

(a) the slope of the moving average profile over 10 km is less than or equal to 25 mm/m.

(b) the maximum length of continuous 35 mm/m gradient does not exceed 6 km.

[Link]. M i n im u m ra d i u s of h or i zo nt a l cu r ve

The minimum design radius of horizontal curve shall be selected with regard to the local design speed of
the curve.

(1) The minimum horizontal design curve radius for new lines shall not be less than 150 m.

(2) Reverse curves (other those in marshalling yards where wagons are shunted individually) with radii in
the range from 150 m up to 300 m for new lines shall be designed to prevent buffer locking. For
straight intermediate track elements between the curves, Table 43 and Table 44 of Appendix I shall
apply. For non-straight intermediate track elements, a detailed calculation shall be made in order to
check the magnitude of the end throw differences.

(3) Instead of point (2), for the 1 520 mm track gauge system, reverse curves with radii in the range from
150 m up to 250 m shall be designed with a section of straight track of at least 15 m between the
curves.

[Link]. M i n i m um ra d i u s of v er ti c al c ur ve

(1) The radius of vertical curves (except for humps in marshalling yards) shall be at least 500 m on a crest
or 900 m in a hollow.

(2) For humps in marshalling yards the radius of vertical curves shall be at least 250 m on a crest or
300 m in a hollow.

(3) Instead of point (1), for the 1 520 mm track gauge system the radius of vertical curves (except the
marshalling yards) shall be at least 5 000 m both on a crest and in a hollow.

(4) Instead of point (2), for the 1 520 mm track gauge system and for humps in marshalling yards the
radius of vertical curves shall be at least 350 m on a crest and 250 m in a hollow.

4.2.4. Track parameters

[Link]. No m i n al tr ack g au g e

(1) European standard nominal track gauge shall be 1 435 mm.

(2) Instead of point (1), for the 1 520 mm track gauge system the nominal track gauge shall be
1 520 mm.
12.12.2014 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 356/23

(3) Instead of point (1), for the 1 668 mm track gauge system, the nominal track gauge shall be
1 668 mm.

(4) Instead of point (1), for the 1 600 mm track gauge system the nominal track gauge shall be
1 600 mm.

[Link]. Ca n t

(1) The design cant for lines shall be limited as defined in Table 7.

Table 7

Design cant [mm]

Freight and mixed traffic Passenger traffic

Ballasted track 160 180

Non ballasted track 170 180

(2) The design cant on tracks adjacent to station platforms where trains are intended to stop in normal
service shall not exceed 110 mm.

(3) New lines with mixed or freight traffic on curves with a radius less than 305 m and a cant transition
steeper than 1 mm/m, the cant shall be restricted to the limit given by the following formula

D ≤ (R – 50)/1,5

where D is the cant in mm and R is the radius in m.

(4) Instead of points (1) to (3), for the 1 520 mm track gauge system the design cant shall not exceed
150 mm.

(5) Instead of point (1), for the 1 668 mm track gauge system, the design cant shall not exceed 180 mm.

(6) Instead of point (2), for the 1 668 mm track gauge system, the design cant on tracks adjacent to station
platforms where trains are intended to stop in normal service shall not exceed 125 mm.

(7) Instead of point (3), for the 1 668 mm track gauge system, for new lines with mixed or freight traffic
on curves with a radius less than 250 m, the cant shall be restricted to the limit given by the following
formula:

D ≤ 0,9 * (R – 50)

where D is the cant in mm and R is the radius in m.

(8) Instead of point (1), for the 1 600 mm track gauge system the design cant shall not exceed 185 mm.

[Link]. Ca n t d ef i c i en c y

(1) The maximum values for cant deficiency are set out in Table 8.

Table 8

Maximum cant deficiency [mm]

Design speed [km/h] v ≤ 160 160 < v ≤ 300 v > 300

For operation of rolling stock conforming to

153 100
the Locomotives and Passenger TSI

For operation of rolling stock conforming to

130 — —
the Freight Wagons TSI
L 356/24 EN Official Journal of the European Union 12.12.2014

(2) It is permissible for trains specifically designed to travel with higher cant deficiency (for example
multiple units with axle loads lower than set out in table 2; vehicles with special equipment for the
negotiation of curves) to run with higher cant deficiency values, subject to a demonstration that this
can be achieved safely.

(3) Instead of point (1), for all types of rolling stock of the 1 520 mm track gauge system the cant defi­
ciency shall not exceed 115 mm. This is valid for speeds up to 200 km/h.

(4) Instead of point (1), for the 1 668 mm track gauge system, the maximum values for cant deficiency are
set out in Table 9.

Table 9

Maximum cant deficiency for the 1 668 mm track gauge system [mm]

Design speed [km/h] v ≤ 160 160 < v ≤ 300 v > 300

For operation of rolling stock conforming to

175 115
the Locomotives and Passenger TSI

For operation of rolling stock conforming to

150 — —
the Freight Wagons TSI

[Link]. Ab r upt ch a n ge o f c an t d ef i ci e nc y

(1) The maximum values of abrupt change of cant deficiency shall be:

(a) 130 mm for v ≤ 60 km/h,

(b) 125 mm for 60 km/h < v ≤ 200 km/h,

(c) 85 mm for 200 km/h < v ≤ 230 km/h

(d) 25 mm for v > 230 km/h.

(2) Where v ≤ 40 km/h and cant deficiency ≤ 75 mm both before and after an abrupt change of curvature,
the value of abrupt change of cant deficiency may be raised to 150 mm.

(3) Instead of points (1) and (2), for the 1 520 mm track gauge system the maximum values of abrupt
change of cant deficiency shall be:

(a) 115 mm for v ≤ 200 km/h,

(b) 85 mm for 200 km/h < v ≤ 230 km/h,

(c) 25 mm for v > 230 km/h.

(4) Instead of point (1), for the 1 668 mm track gauge system, the maximum design values of abrupt
change of cant deficiency shall be:

(a) 110 mm for v ≤ 115 km/h,

(b) (399-v)/2,6 [mm] for 115 km/h < v ≤ 220 km/h,

(c) 70 mm for 220 km/h < v ≤ 230 km/h.

Abrupt change of cant deficiency is not allowed for speeds of more than 230 km/h.
12.12.2014 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 356/25

[Link]. Eq uiv a l e nt c on i ci ty

(1) The limiting values for equivalent conicity quoted in Table 10 shall be calculated for the amplitude (y)
of the wheelset's lateral displacement:

— y = 3 mm, if (TG – SR) ≥ 7mm

� �
ðTG − SRÞ − 1
— y¼ , if 5mm ≤ (TG – SR) < 7mm
2

— y = 2 mm, if (TG – SR) < 5mm

where TG is the track gauge and SR is the distance between the flange contact faces of the wheelset.

(2) No assessment of equivalent conicity is required for switches and crossings.

(3) Design values of track gauge, rail head profile and rail inclination for plain line shall be selected to
ensure that the equivalent conicity limits set out in Table 10 are not exceeded.

Table 10

Equivalent conicity design limit values

Wheel profile

Speed range [km/h] S1002, GV1/40

v ≤ 60 Assessment not required

60 < v ≤ 200 0,25

200 < v ≤ 280 0,20

v > 280 0,10

(4) The following wheelsets shall be modelled passing over the designed track conditions (simulated by
calculation according to EN 15302:2008+A1:2010):

(a) S 1002 as defined in Annex C of EN 13715:2006+A1:2010 with SR1.

(b) S 1002 as defined in Annex C of EN 13715:2006+A1:2010 with SR2.

(c) GV 1/40 as defined in Annex B of EN 13715:2006+A1:2010 with SR1.

(d) GV 1/40 as defined in Annex B of EN 13715:2006+A1:2010 with SR2.

For SR1 and SR2 the following values apply:

(a) For the 1 435 mm track gauge system SR1 = 1 420 mm and SR2 = 1 426 mm.

(b) For the 1 524 mm track gauge system SR1 = 1 505 mm and SR2 = 1 511 mm.

(c) For the 1 600 mm track gauge system SR1 = 1 585 mm and SR2 = 1 591 mm.

(d) For the 1 668 mm track gauge system SR1 = 1 653 mm and SR2 = 1 659 mm.

(5) Instead of points (1) to (4), for the 1 520 mm track gauge system, no assessment of equivalent conicity
is required.
L 356/26 EN Official Journal of the European Union 12.12.2014

[Link]. R ai l h e ad pro f i le fo r pla i n li ne

(1) The railhead profile shall be selected from the range set out in Annex A of EN 13674-1:2011, Annex A
of EN13674-4:2006+A1:2009 or shall be in accordance with as defined in point (2).

(2) The design of railhead profiles for plain line shall comprise:

(a) a lateral slope on the side of the railhead angled to between vertical and 1/16 with reference to the
vertical axis of the railhead;

(b) the vertical distance between the top of this lateral slope and the top of the rail shall be less than
20 mm;

(c) a radius of at least 12 mm at the gauge corner;

(d) the horizontal distance between the crown of the rail and the tangent point shall be between 31
and 37,5 mm.

Figure 1

Railhead profile

(3) These requirements are not applicable to expansion devices.

[Link]. R a il in c l in a ti on

[Link].1. Plain line

(1) The rail shall be inclined towards the centre of the track.

(2) The rail inclination for a given route shall be selected from the range 1/20 to 1/40.

(3) For sections of not more than 100 m between switches and crossings without inclination where the
running speed is no more than 200 km/h, the laying of rails without inclination is allowed.
12.12.2014 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 356/27

[Link].2. Requirements for switches and crossings

(1) The rail shall be designed to be either vertical or inclined.

(2) If the rail is inclined, the designed inclination shall be selected from the range 1/20 to 1/40.

(3) The inclination can be given by the shape of the active part of the rail head profile.

(4) Within switches and crossings where the running speed is more than 200 km/h and no more than
250 km/h, the laying of rails without inclination is allowed provided that it is limited to sections not
exceeding 50 m.

(5) For speeds of more than 250 km/h the rails shall be inclined.

4.2.5. Switches and crossings

[Link]. De s i g n ge o m e tr y o f s wi tc hes a nd c rossin gs

Point [Link] of this TSI defines immediate action limits for switches and crossings that are compatible with
geometrical characteristics of wheelsets as defined in the rolling stock TSIs. It will be the task of the infra­
structure manager to decide geometrical design values appropriate to its maintenance plan.

[Link]. Use o f s wi n g n os e cr os s in g

For speeds higher than 250 km/h switches and crossings shall be equipped with swing-nose crossings.

[Link]. Ma x im u m u n g u i d ed le n gt h of f ixe d obtu se cr ossi n gs

The design value of the maximum unguided length of fixed obtuse crossings shall be in accordance with
the requirements set out in Appendix J to this TSI.

4.2.6. Track resistance to applied loads

[Link]. Tra c k r es i s ta nc e to v er tic al load s

The track design, including switches and crossings, shall take into account at least the following forces:

(a) the axle load selected according to point 4.2.1;

(b) maximum vertical wheel forces. Maximum wheel forces for defined test conditions are defined in
EN 14363:2005 point [Link].

(c) vertical quasi-static wheel forces. Maximum quasi-static wheel forces for defined test conditions are
defined in EN 14363:2005 points [Link].

[Link]. L on g i tu d i na l t r ack r es i s tan ce

[Link].1. Design forces

The track, including switches and crossings, shall be designed to withstand longitudinal forces equivalent to
the force arising from braking of 2,5 m/s2 for the performance parameters chosen in accordance with
point 4.2.1.

[Link].2. Compatibility with braking systems

(1) The track, including switches and crossings, shall be designed to be compatible with the use of magnetic
braking systems for emergency braking.

(2) The requirements for the design of track, including switches and crossings, which are compatible with
the use of eddy current braking systems are an open point.

(3) For the 1 600 mm track gauge system it shall be allowed not to apply point (1).
L 356/28 EN Official Journal of the European Union 12.12.2014

[Link]. L at e ra l tr ack res i s ta n ce

The track design, including switches and crossings, shall take into account at least the following forces:

(a) lateral forces; Maximum lateral forces exerted by a wheel set on the track for defined test conditions are
defined in EN 14363:2005 point [Link].

(b) quasi-static guiding forces; Maximum quasi-static guiding forces Yqst for defined radii and test condi­
tions are defined in EN 14363:2005 point [Link].

4.2.7. Structures resistance to traffic loads

The requirements of EN 1991-2:2003/AC:2010 and Annex A2 to EN 1990:2002 issued as EN 1990:2002/

A1:2005 specified in this section of the TSI are to be applied in accordance with the corresponding points
in the national annexes to these standards if they exist.

[Link]. Res is t an ce of n ew b r i d g e s to tr af f i c loa ds

[Link].1. Vertical loads

(1) Structures shall be designed to support vertical loads in accordance with the following load models,
defined in EN 1991-2:2003/[Link]

(a) Load Model 71, as set out in EN 1991-2:2003/AC:2010 point 6.3.2 (2)P

(b) In addition, for continuous bridges, Load Model SW/0, as set out in EN 1991-2:2003/AC:2010
point 6.3.3 (3)P

(2) The load models shall be multiplied by the factor alpha (a) as set out in EN 1991-2:2003/AC:2010
points 6.3.2 (3)P and 6.3.3 (5)P.

(3) The value of factor alpha (a) shall be equal to or greater than the values set out in Table 11.

Table 11

Factor alpha (a) for the design of new structures

Type of traffic Minimum factor alpha (α)

P1, P2, P3, P4 1,0

P5 0,91

P6 0,83

P1520 Open point

P1600 1,1

F1, F2, F3 1,0

F4 0,91

F1520 Open point

F1600 1,1

[Link].2. Allowance for dynamic effects of vertical loads

(1) The load effects from the Load Model 71 and Load Model SW/0 shall be enhanced by the dynamic
factor phi (Φ) as set out in EN 1991-2:2003/AC:2010 points 6.4.3 (1)P and [Link] (2).
12.12.2014 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 356/29

(2) For bridges for speeds over 200 km/h where EN 1991-2:2003/AC:2010 paragraph 6.4.4 requires a
dynamic analysis to be carried out the structure shall additionally be designed for HSLM defined in
EN 1991-2:2003/AC:2010 paragraphs [Link].1 (3) to (6) inclusive.

(3) It is permissible to design new bridges such that they will also accommodate an individual passenger
train with higher axle loads than covered by HSLM. The dynamic analysis shall be undertaken using the
characteristic value of the loading from the individual train taken as the design mass under normal
payload in accordance with Appendix K with an allowance for passengers in standing areas in accord­
ance with Note 1 of Appendix K.

[Link].3. Centrifugal forces

Where the track on a bridge is curved over the whole or part of the length of the bridge, the centrifugal
force shall be taken into account in the design of structures as set out in EN 1991-2:2003/AC:2010 para­
graphs 6.5.1 (2), (4)P and (7).

[Link].4. Nosing forces

The nosing force shall be taken into account in the design of structures as set out in EN 1991-2:2003/
AC:2010 point 6.5.2.

[Link].5. Actions due to traction and braking (longitudinal loads)

Traction and braking forces shall be taken into account in the design of structures as set out in
EN 1991-2:2003/AC:2010 paragraphs 6.5.3 (2)P, (4), (5), (6).and (7)P.

[Link].6. Design track twist due to rail traffic actions

The maximum total design track twist due to rail traffic actions shall not exceed the values set out in para­
graph A2.[Link](3)P in Annex A2 to EN 1990:2002 issued as EN 1990:2002/A1:2005.

[Link]. E q ui v al e n t v er t ic a l l o ad i n g for new ear t hworks a nd ea r th pre ssu r e ef fec ts

(1) Earthworks shall be designed and earth pressure effects shall be specified taking into account the vertical
loads produced by the Load Model 71, as set out in EN 1991-2:2003/AC:2010 paragraph 6.3.2(2).

(2) The equivalent vertical loading shall be multiplied by the factor alpha (a) as set out in EN 1991-2:2003/
AC:2010 paragraph 6.3.2 (3)P. The value of a shall be equal to or greater than the values set out in
Table 11.

[Link]. Re si s t an c e of n ew s tr u c t u res over or a dj ac e nt to tr ac ks

Aerodynamic actions from passing trains shall be taken into account as set out in EN 1991-2:2003/
AC:2010 paragraphs 6.6.2 to 6.6.6 inclusive.

[Link]. R e s is t an c e of ex i s ti n g b r i d g e s an d e ar th wor ks to tra ff i c loa ds

(1) Bridges and earthworks shall be brought to a specified level of interoperability according to the TSI cat­
egory of line as defined in point 4.2.1.

(2) The minimum capability requirements for structures for each traffic code are given in Appendix E. The
values represent the minimum target level that structures must be capable of for the line to be declared
interoperable.

(3) The following cases are relevant:

(a) Where an existing structure is replaced by a new structure then the new structure shall be in
accordance with the requirements of point [Link] or point [Link].

(b) If the minimum capability of the existing structures expressed by the published EN line category in
combination with the allowed speed satisfies the requirements in Appendix E then the existing
structures satisfy the relevant interoperability requirements.
L 356/30 EN Official Journal of the European Union 12.12.2014

(c) Where the capability of an existing structure does not satisfy the requirements in Appendix E and
works (e.g. strengthening) are being carried out to raise the capability of the structure to meet the
requirements of this TSI (and the structure is not to be replaced by a new structure) then the struc­
ture shall be brought into conformity with the requirements in Appendix E.

(4) For the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland networks, in paragraphs (2) and (3)
above the EN line category may be replaced by Route Availability (RA) number (delivered in accordance
with the national technical rule notified for this purpose) and consequently reference to Appendix E are
replaced by reference to Appendix F.

4.2.8. Immediate action limits on track geometry defects

[Link]. T h e i m m e d ia t e a c t i on l im i t fo r al i gnm e nt

(1) The immediate action limits for isolated defects in alignment are set out in point 8.5 of
EN 13848-5:2008+A1:2010. Isolated defects shall not exceed the limits of wavelength range D1 as set
out in Table 6 of the EN Standard

(2) The immediate action limits for isolated defects in alignment for speeds of more than 300 km/h are an
open point.

[Link]. The i m m e d ia t e a c ti on l i m i t for l ongi tu d i nal level

(1) The immediate action limits for isolated defects in longitudinal level are set out in point 8.3 of
EN 13848-5:2008+A1:2010. Isolated defects shall not exceed the limits of wavelength range D1 as set
out in table 5 of the EN Standard

(2) The immediate action limits for isolated defects in longitudinal level for speeds of more than 300 km/h
are an open point.

[Link]. T h e i m m e d i at e a c t io n l i m it for tra ck tw i st

(1) The immediate action limit for track twist as an isolated defect is given as a zero to peak value. Track
twist is defined in EN 13848-1:2003+A1:2008 point 4.6.

(2) The track twist limit is a function of the measurement base applied according to EN 13848-5:2008
+A1:2010 point 8.6.

(3) The infrastructure manager shall set out in the maintenance plan the base-length on which it will
measure the track in order to check compliance with this requirement. The base-length of measurement
shall include at least one base between 2 and 5 m.

(4) Instead of points (1) and (2), for the 1 520 mm track gauge system the track twist, for a base length of
10 m, shall be not more than:

(a) 16 mm for passenger lines with v > 120 km/h or freight lines with v > 80 km/h

(b) 20 mm for passenger lines with v ≤ 120 km/h or freight lines with v ≤ 80 km/h

(5) Instead of point (3), for the 1 520 mm track gauge system the Infrastructure Manager shall set out in
the maintenance plan the base-length on which it will measure the track in order to check compliance
with this requirement. The base-length of measurement shall include at least one base of 10 m.

(6) Instead of point (2), for the 1 668 mm track gauge system, the track twist limit is a function of the
measurement base applied according to one of the following equations depending on the cant:

(a) Twist limit = (20/l + 3) for u ≤ 0,67 × (r – 100) with a maximum value of:

7 mm/m for speeds v ≤ 200 km/h, 5 mm/m for speed v > 200 km/h

(b) Twist limit = (20/l + 1,5) for 0,67 × (r – 100) < u < 0,9 × (r – 50) with a maximum value of:

6 mm/m for l ≤ 5 m, 3 mm/m for l > 13 m

u = cant (mm), l = twist base length (m), r = horizontal curve radius (m)
12.12.2014 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 356/31

[Link]. T h e im m e d i at e ac ti on l im i t of tr ack gau ge a s a n i sola ted d efec t

(1) The immediate action limits of track gauge as an isolated defect are set out in Table 12.

Table 12

Immediate action limits of track gauge

Speed [km/h] Dimensions [mm]

Minimum track gauge Maximum track gauge

v ≤ 120 1 426 1 470

120 < v ≤ 160 1 427 1 470

160 < v ≤ 230 1 428 1 463

v > 230 1 430 1 463

(2) Instead of point (1), for the 1 520 track gauge system the immediate action limits of track gauge as an
isolated defect are set out in Table 13.

Table 13

Immediate action limits of track gauge for 1 520 mm track gauge system

Speed [km/h] Dimensions [mm]

Minimum track gauge Maximum track gauge

v ≤ 140 1 512 1 548

v > 140 1 512 1 536

(3) Instead of point (1), for the 1 600 track gauge system the immediate action limits of track gauge as an
isolated defect are:

(a) minimum track gauge: 1 591 mm

(b) maximum track gauge: 1 635 mm.

[Link]. T he i m m ed i a te a c t io n li m i t fo r ca nt

(1) The maximum cant allowed in service is 180 mm.

(2) The maximum cant allowed in service is 190 mm for dedicated passenger traffic lines.

(3) Instead of points (1) and (2), for the 1 520 mm track gauge system, the maximum cant allowed in
service is 150 mm.

(4) Instead of points (1) and (2), for the 1 600 mm track gauge system, the maximum cant allowed in
service is 185 mm.

(5) Instead of points (1) and (2), for the 1 668 mm track gauge system, the maximum cant allowed in
service is 200 mm.
L 356/32 EN Official Journal of the European Union 12.12.2014

[Link]. T h e im m e d i at e ac ti on l im i ts for swi tc hes a nd c rossi ngs

Figure 2

Point retraction in fixed common crossings

(1) The technical characteristics of switches and crossings shall comply with the following in-service values:

(a) Maximum value of free wheel passage in switches: 1 380 mm.

This value can be increased if the infrastructure manager demonstrates that the actuation and
locking system of the switch is able to resist the lateral impact forces of a wheelset.

(b) Minimum value of fixed nose protection for common crossings: 1 392 mm.

This value is measured 14 mm below the running surface, and on the theoretical reference line, at
an appropriate distance back from the actual point (RP) of the nose as indicated in Figure 2.

For crossings with point retraction, this value can be reduced. In this case the infrastructure
manager shall demonstrate that the point retraction is sufficient to guarantee that the wheel will
not hit the nose at the actual point (RP).

(c) Maximum value of free wheel passage at crossing nose: 1 356 mm.

(d) Maximum value of free wheel passage at check rail/wing rail entry: 1 380 mm.

(e) Minimum flangeway width: 38 mm.

(f) Minimum flangeway depth: 40 mm.

(g) Maximum height of check rail: 70 mm.

(2) All relevant requirements for switches and crossings are also applicable to other technical solutions
using switch rails, for example side modifiers used in multi-rail track.

(3) Instead of point (1), for the 1 520 mm track gauge system the technical characteristics of switches and
crossings shall comply with the following in-service values:

(a) Minimum value of bypass at the narrowest location between open switch rail and stock rail is
65 mm.

(b) Minimum value of fixed nose protection for common crossings is 1 472 mm

(c) This value is measured 13 mm below the running surface, and on the theoretical reference line, at
an appropriate distance back from the actual point (RP) of the nose as indicated in Figure 2. For
crossings with point retraction, this value can be reduced. In this case the Infrastructure Manager
shall demonstrate that the point retraction is sufficient to guarantee that the wheel will not hit the
nose at the actual point (RP).
12.12.2014 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 356/33

(d) Maximum value of free wheel passage at crossing nose is 1 435 mm

(e) Minimum flangeway width is 42 mm

(f) Minimum flangeway depth is 40 mm

(g) Maximum height of check rail is 50 mm

(4) Instead of point (1), for the 1 600 mm track gauge system the technical characteristics of switches and
crossings shall comply with the following in-service values:

(a) Maximum value of free wheel passage in switches: 1 546 mm.

This value can be increased if the infrastructure manager demonstrates that the actuation and
locking system of the switch is able to resist the lateral impact forces of a wheelset.

(b) Minimum value of fixed nose protection for common crossings: 1 556 mm.

This value is measured 14 mm below the running surface, and on the theoretical reference line, at
an appropriate distance back from the actual point (RP) of the nose as indicated in Figure 2.

For crossings with point retraction, this value can be reduced. In this case the infrastructure
manager shall demonstrate that the point retraction is sufficient to guarantee that the wheel will
not hit the nose at the actual point (RP).

(c) Maximum value of free wheel passage at crossing nose: 1 520 mm.

(d) Maximum value of free wheel passage at check rail/wing rail entry: 1 546 mm.

(e) Minimum flangeway width: 38 mm.

(f) Minimum flangeway depth: 40 mm.

(g) Maximum height of check rail above head of running rail: 25 mm.

4.2.9. Platforms

(1) The requirements of this point are only applicable to passenger platforms where trains are intended to
stop in normal service.

(2) For the requirements of this point it is permissible to design platforms required for the current service
requirement provided provision is made for the reasonably foreseeable future service requirements.
When specifying the interfaces with trains intended to stop at the platform, consideration shall be given
to both the current service requirements and the reasonably foreseeable service requirements at least
10 years following the bringing into service of the platform.

[Link]. U s ab l e l e n g t h of p la tfo r m s

The usable length of a platform shall be defined according to point 4.2.1.

[Link]. Pl at for m h ei g h t

(1) The nominal platform height shall be 550 mm or 760 mm above the running surface for radii of
300 m or more.

(2) For smaller radii the nominal platform height may be adjusted depending on the platform offset to
minimise the stepping distance between the train and the platform.
L 356/34 EN Official Journal of the European Union 12.12.2014

(3) For platforms where trains, which are outside the scope of the LOC&PAS TSI, are intended to stop,
different provisions for the nominal platform height might apply.

(4) Instead of points (1) and (2), for the 1 520 mm track gauge system the nominal platform height shall
be 200 mm or 550 mm above the running surface.

(5) Instead of points (1) and (2), for the 1 600 mm track gauge system the nominal platform height shall
be 915 mm above the running surface.

[Link]. Pl at for m of fs e t

(1) The distance between the track centre and the platform edge parallel to the running plane (bq), as
defined in chapter 13 of EN 15273-3:2013, shall be set on the basis of the installation limit gauge
(bqlim). The installation limit gauge shall be calculated on the basis of the gauge G1.

(2) The platform shall be built close to the gauge within a maximum tolerance of 50 mm. The value for bq
shall therefore respond to:

bqlim ≤ bq ≤ bqlim + 50 mm.

(3) Instead of points (1) and (2), for the 1 520 mm track gauge system the platform offset shall be:

(a) 1 920 mm for platforms with heights of 550 mm and

(b) 1 745 mm for platforms with height of 200 mm.

(4) Instead of points (1) and (2), for the 1 600 mm track gauge system the platform offset shall be
1 560 mm.

[Link]. Tr ac k l ayou t al on g s i d e p l a tfor m s

(1) Track adjacent to the platforms for new lines shall preferably be straight, but shall nowhere have a
radius of less than 300 m.

(2) No values are specified for an existing track alongside new, renewed or upgraded platforms.

4.2.10. Health, safety and environment

[Link]. M ax im u m p r es s u re v ar i at i o ns i n t un nel s

(1) Any tunnel or underground structure intended to be operated at speeds greater than or equal to
200 km/h has to provide that maximum pressure variation, caused by the passage of a train running at
the maximum allowed speed in the tunnel, do not exceed 10 kPa during the time taken for the train to
pass through the tunnel.

(2) Above requirement has to be fulfilled along the outside of any train complying with the Locomotives
and Passenger TSI.

[Link]. E ffec t of c r os s w i n ds

(1) A line is interoperable from the cross wind point of view if safety is ensured for a reference train
running along that line under the most critical operational conditions.

(2) The rules for proving conformity shall take into account the characteristic wind curves of the reference
trains defined in the LOC&PAS TSI.
12.12.2014 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 356/35

(3) If safety cannot be achieved without mitigating measures, either due to the geographic situation or to
other specific features of the line, the infrastructure manager shall take the necessary measures to main­
tain the safety, for example by:

— locally reducing train speeds, possibly temporarily during periods at risk of storms,

— installing equipment to protect the track section concerned from cross winds,

— other appropriate means.

(4) It shall be demonstrated that safety is achieved after measures taken.

[Link]. Ba ll a s t p i ck- u p

(1) The aerodynamic interaction between rolling stock and infrastructure may cause the lifting and further
blowing away of ballast stones from the track bed.

(2) The requirements for the infrastructure subsystem aimed at mitigating the risk for ‘ballast pick up’
apply only to lines with maximum speed greater than or equal to 200 km/h.

(3) The requirements of point (2) above are an open point.

4.2.11. Provision for operation

[Link]. L oc at io n m a r ke r s

Location markers shall be provided at nominal intervals along the track of not more than 1 000 m.

[Link]. E qu iv a le n t c o n i ci t y i n se r v i c e

(1) If ride instability is reported, the railway undertaking and the infrastructure manager shall localise the
section of the line in a joint investigation according paragraphs (2) and (3) hereafter.

Note: This joint investigation is also specified in point [Link].3.2 of TSI LOC & PAS for action on
rolling stock.

(2) The infrastructure manager shall measure the track gauge and the railhead profiles at the site in ques­
tion at a distance of approximate 10 m. The mean equivalent conicity over 100 m shall be calculated
by modelling with the wheelsets (a) – (d) mentioned in paragraph [Link](4) of this TSI in order to
check for compliance, for the purpose of the joint investigation, with the limit equivalent conicity for
the track specified in Table 14.

Table 14

Equivalent conicity in service limit values for the track (for the purpose of joint investigation)

Maximum value of mean equivalent conicity over

Speed range [km/h]
100 m

v ≤ 60 assessment not required

60 < v ≤ 120 0,40

120 < v ≤ 160 0,35

160 < v ≤ 230 0,30

v > 230 0,25

L 356/36 EN Official Journal of the European Union 12.12.2014

(3) If the mean equivalent conicity over 100 m complies with the limit values in Table 14, a joint investiga­
tion by the railway undertaking and the infrastructure manager shall be undertaken to specify the
reason for the instability.

4.2.12. Fixed installations for servicing trains

[Link]. G e n e ral

This point 4.2.12 sets out the infrastructure elements of the maintenance subsystem required for servicing
trains.

[Link]. To il e t d i sc har g e

Fixed installations for toilet discharge shall be compatible with the characteristics of the retention toilet
system specified in the rolling stock TSI.

[Link]. Tra i n ex ter n a l c l ea n i n g f ac i li t i es

(1) Where a washing plant is provided it shall be able to clean the outer sides of single or double-deck
trains between a height of:

(a) 500 to 3 500 mm for a single-deck train,

(b) 500 to 4 300 mm for double-deck trains.

(2) The washing plant shall be designed so that trains can be driven through it at any speed between
2 km/h and 5 km/h.

[Link]. Wa ter re s t ock i ng

(1) Fixed equipment for water restocking shall be compatible with the characteristics of the water system
specified in the rolling stock TSI.

(2) Fixed equipment for drinking water supply on the interoperable network shall be supplied with
drinking water meeting the requirements of Council Directive 98/83/EC (1).

[Link]. R ef u el li n g

Refuelling equipment shall be compatible with the characteristics of the fuel system specified in the rolling
stock TSIs.

[Link]. El ectr i ca l sh or e s up p ly

Where provided, electrical shore supply shall be by means of one or more of the power supply systems spe­
cified in the rolling stock TSIs.

4.3. Functional and technical specification of the interfaces

From the standpoint of technical compatibility, the interfaces of the infrastructure subsystem with the other
subsystems are like described in the following points.

(1) Council Directive 98/83/EC of 3 November 1998 on the quality of water intended for human consumption (OJ L 330, 5.12.1998, p. 32).
12.12.2014 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 356/37

4.3.1. Interfaces with the rolling stock subsystem

Table 15

Interfaces with the rolling stock subsystem, ‘Locomotives and Passenger Rolling Stock TSI’

Reference Locomotives and Passenger Rolling

Interface Reference Infrastructure TSI
Stock TSI

Track gauge [Link] Nominal track gauge [Link].2.1 Mechanical and geometrical
[Link] Design geometry of switches characteristics of wheelset
and crossings [Link].2.3 Variable gauge wheelsets
[Link] The immediate action limits for
switches and crossings

Gauge [Link] Structure gauge [Link]. Gauging

[Link] Distance between track centres
[Link] Minimum radius of vertical
curve
[Link] Platform offset

Axle load and axle [Link] Track resistance to vertical loads [Link] Load conditions and weighed
spacing [Link] Lateral track resistance mass
[Link] Resistance of new bridges to [Link].1 Axle load parameter
traffic loads
[Link] Equivalent vertical loading for
new earthworks and earth pressure
effects imposed on new structures
[Link] Resistance of existing bridges
and earthworks to traffic loads

Running character­ [Link] Track resistance to vertical loads [Link].2.1 Limit values for running safely
istics [Link] Lateral track resistance [Link].2.2 Track loading limit values
[Link].4 Nosing forces

Ride stability [Link] Equivalent conicity [Link].3 Equivalent conicity

[Link] Railhead profile for plain line [Link].2.2 Mechanical and geometrical
[Link] Equivalent conicity in service characteristics of wheels

Longitudinal actions [Link] Longitudinal track resistance [Link] Braking performance

[Link].5 Actions due to traction and
braking (longitudinal loads)

Minimum hori­ [Link] Minimum radius of horizontal [Link] Minimum curve radius
zontal curve radius curve Annex A, A.1 Buffers

Running dynamic [Link] Cant deficiency [Link].2. Running dynamic behaviour

behaviour

Maximum decelera­ [Link] Longitudinal track resistance [Link] Braking performance

tion [Link].5 Actions due to traction and
braking
L 356/38 EN Official Journal of the European Union 12.12.2014

Reference Locomotives and Passenger Rolling

Interface Reference Infrastructure TSI
Stock TSI

Aerodynamic effect [Link] Distance between track centres [Link].1 Slipstream effects on passengers
[Link] Resistance of new structures on platforms and on trackside workers
over or adjacent to tracks [Link].2 Head pressure pulse
[Link] Maximum pressure variations [Link].3 Maximum pressure variations in
in tunnels tunnels
[Link] Ballast pick up [Link].5 Aerodynamic effect on ballasted
tracks

Crosswind [Link] Effect of crosswinds [Link].4 Crosswind

Installations for [Link] Toilet discharge [Link] Toilet discharge system

servicing trains [Link] Train external cleaning facil­ [Link].2 Exterior cleaning through a
ities washing plant
[Link] Water restocking [Link] Water refilling equipment
[Link] Refuelling [Link] Interface for water refilling
[Link] Electric shore supply [Link] Refuelling equipment
[Link] Special requirements for stabling
of trains

Table 16

Interfaces with the rolling stock subsystem, ‘Freight Wagons TSI’

Reference Conventional Rail Freight Wagons

Interface Reference Infrastructure TSI
TSI

Track gauge [Link] Nominal track gauge [Link].2 Characteristics of wheelsets

[Link] Railhead profile for plain line [Link].3 Characteristics of wheels
[Link] Design geometry of switches
and crossings
[Link] The immediate action limits for
switches and crossings

Gauge [Link] Structure gauge [Link] Gauging

[Link] Distance between track centres
[Link] Minimum radius of vertical
curve
[Link] Platform offset

Axle load and axle [Link] Track resistance to vertical loads [Link] Compatibility with load carrying
spacing [Link] Lateral track resistance capacity of lines
[Link] Resistance of new bridges to
traffic loads
[Link] Equivalent vertical loading for
new earthworks and earth pressure
effects imposed on new structures
[Link] Resistance of existing bridges
and earthworks to traffic loads
12.12.2014 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 356/39

Reference Conventional Rail Freight Wagons

Interface Reference Infrastructure TSI
TSI

Running dynamic 4.2.8 Immediate action limits on track [Link].2 Running dynamic behaviour
behaviour geometry defects

Longitudinal actions [Link] Longitudinal track resistance [Link].2 Brake performance

[Link].5 Actions due to traction and
braking (longitudinal loads)

Minimum curve [Link] Minimum radius of horizontal [Link]. Mechanical interface

radius curve

Vertical curve [Link] Minimum radius of vertical [Link] Gauging

curve

Crosswind [Link] Effect of crosswinds [Link] Cross winds

4.3.2. Interfaces with the energy subsystem

Table 17

Interfaces with the energy subsystem

Interface Reference Infrastructure TSI Reference Energy TSI

Gauge [Link] Structure gauge 4.2.10 Pantographs gauge

4.3.3. Interfaces with the control command and signalling subsystem

Table 18

Interfaces with the control command and signalling subsystem

Reference Control Command and Signalling

Interface Reference Infrastructure TSI
TSI

Structure gauge set [Link] Structure gauge [Link] Eurobalise communication (space
for CCS installa­ for installation)
tions. [Link] Euroloop communication (space for
Visibility of track- installation)
side CCS objects. 4.2.10 Train detection systems (space for
installation)
4.2.15 Visibility of track-side control-
command and signalling objects
L 356/40 EN Official Journal of the European Union 12.12.2014

4.3.4. Interfaces with the operation and traffic management subsystem

Table 19

Interfaces with the operation and traffic management subsystem

Reference Operation and Traffic Management

Interface Reference Infrastructure TSI
TSI

Ride stability [Link] Equivalent conicity in service [Link].4. Operational quality

Use of eddy current [Link] Longitudinal track resistance [Link].2 Braking performance
brakes

Crosswinds [Link] Effect of crosswinds [Link].3 Contingency arrangements

Operating rules 4.4 Operating rules [Link].2 Modifications to information

contained in the route book
[Link] Degraded operation

Staff competences 4.6 Professional competences 2.2.1 Staff and trains

4.4. Operating rules

(1) Operating rules are developed within the procedures described in the infrastructure manager's safety
management system. These rules take into account the documentation related to operation which
forms a part of the technical file as required in Article 18(3) and set out in Annex VI (point I.2.4) of
Directive 2008/57/EC.

(2) In certain situations involving pre-planned works, it may be necessary to temporarily suspend the speci­
fications of the infrastructure subsystem and its interoperability constituents defined in sections 4 and 5
of this TSI.

4.5. Maintenance rules

(1) Maintenance rules are developed within the procedures described in the infrastructure manager's safety
management system.

(2) The maintenance file shall be prepared before placing a line into service as the part of the technical file
accompanying the declaration of verification

(3) The maintenance plan shall be drawn up for the subsystem to ensure that the requirements set out in
this TSI are maintained during its lifetime.

4.5.1. Maintenance file

A maintenance file shall contain at least:

(a) a set of values for immediate action limits,

(b) the measures taken (for example speed restriction, repair time) when prescribed limits are not met,

related to track geometric quality and limits on isolated defects.

12.12.2014 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 356/41

4.5.2. Maintenance plan

The infrastructure manager shall have a maintenance plan containing the items listed in point 4.5.1
together with at least the following items related to the same elements:

(a) a set of values for intervention limits and alert limits,

(b) a statement about the methods, professional competences of staff and personal protective safety equip­
ment necessary to be used,

(c) the rules to be applied for the protection of people working on or near the track,

(d) the means used to check that in-service values are respected.

4.6. Professional qualifications

The professional qualifications of staff required for operation and maintenance of the infrastructure
subsystem are not set out in this TSI but are described in the infrastructure manager's safety management
system.

4.7. Health and safety conditions

(1) The health and safety conditions of staff required for the operation and maintenance of the infrastruc­
ture subsystem shall be compliant with the the relevant European and national legislation.

(2) The issue is covered by the procedures described in the infrastructure manager's safety management
system.

5. INTEROPERABILITY CONSTITUENTS

5.1. Basis on which interoperability constituents have been selected

(1) The requirements of point 5.3 are based on a traditional design of ballasted track with Vignole (flat-
bottom) rail on concrete or wooden sleepers and fastening providing resistance to longitudinal slip by
bearing on the rail foot.

(2) Components and subassemblies used for the construction of other designs of track are not considered
to be interoperability constituents.

5.2. List of constituents

(1) For the purposes of this technical specification for interoperability, only the following elements,
whether individual components or subassemblies of the track are declared to be ‘interoperability
constituents’:

(a) the rail (5.3.1),

(b) the rail fastening systems (5.3.2),

(c) track sleepers (5.3.3).

(2) The following points describe the specifications applicable to each of these constituents.

(3) Rails, fastenings and sleepers used for short length of track for specific purposes, for example in
switches and crossings, at expansion devices, transition slabs and special structures, are not considered
to be interoperability constituents.

5.3. Constituents performances and specifications

5.3.1. The rail

The specifications of the ‘rail’ interoperability constituent concern the following parameters:

(a) railhead profile,

(b) rail steel.

L 356/42 EN Official Journal of the European Union 12.12.2014

[Link]. R ai l h e ad pro f i le

The rail head profile shall fulfil the requirements of point [Link] ‘Railhead profile for plain line’.

[Link]. R a il s te el

(1) The rail steel is relevant to the requirements of point 4.2.6 ‘Track resistance to applied loads’.

(2) The rail steel shall meet the following requirements:

(a) The rail hardness shall be at least 200 HBW.

(b) The tensile strength shall be at least 680 MPa.

(c) Minimum number of cycles at fatigue test without failure shall be at least 5 × 106.

5.3.2. The rail fastening systems

(1) The rail fastening system is relevant to the requirements of point [Link] for ‘Track resistance to vertical
loads’, point [Link] for ‘Longitudinal track resistance’ and point [Link] for ‘Lateral track resistance’.

(2) The rail fastening system shall comply in laboratory test conditions with the following requirements:

(a) the longitudinal force required to cause the rail to begin to slip (i.e. move in an inelastic way)
through a single rail fastening assembly shall be at least 7 kN and for speeds of more than
250 km/h shall be at least 9 kN,

(b) the rail fastening shall resist application of 3 000 000 cycles of the typical load applied in a sharp
curve, such that the performance of the fastening in terms of clamping force and longitudinal
restraint is not degraded by more than 20 % and vertical stiffness is not degraded by more than
25 %. The typical load shall be appropriate to:

— the maximum axle load the rail fastening system is designed to accommodate,

— the combination of rail, rail inclination, rail pad and type of sleepers with which the fastening
system may be used.

5.3.3. Track sleepers

(1) Track sleepers shall be designed such that when they are used with a specified rail and rail fastening
system they will have properties that are consistent with the requirements of point [Link] for ‘Nominal
track gauge’, point [Link] for ‘Rail inclination’ and point 4.2.6 for ‘Track resistance to applied loads’.

(2) For the nominal track gauge system of 1 435 mm, the design track gauge for track sleepers shall be
1 437 mm.

6. ASSESSMENT OF CONFORMITY OF INTEROPERABILITY CONSTITUENTS AND EC VERIFICATION OF THE SUBSYS­

TEMS

Modules for the procedures for assessment of conformity and suitability for use and EC verification are
defined in Article 8 of this Regulation.

6.1. Interoperability Constituents

6.1.1. Conformity assessment procedures

(1) The conformity assessment procedure of interoperability constituents as defined in section 5 of this TSI
shall be carried out by application of the relevant modules.

(2) Serviceable interoperability constituents that are suitable for reuse are not subject to the conformity
assessment procedures.
12.12.2014 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 356/43

6.1.2. Application of modules

(1) The following modules for conformity assessment of interoperability constituents are used:

(a) CA ‘Internal production control’

(b) CB ‘EC type examination’

(c) CC ‘Conformity to type based on internal production control’

(d) CD ‘Conformity to type based on quality management system of the production process’

(e) CF ‘Conformity to type based on product verification’

(f) CH ‘Conformity based on full quality management system’

(2) The modules for conformity assessment of interoperability constituents shall be chosen from those
shown in Table 20.

Table 20

Modules for conformity assessment to be applied for interoperability constitunents

Procedures Rail Rail fastening system Track sleepers

Placed on the EU market before entry CA or CH CA or CH

into force of relevant TSIs

Placed on the EU market after entry CB + CC or

into force of relevant TSIs CB + CD or
CB + CF or
CH

(3) In the case of products placed on the market before the publication of relevant TSIs, the type is consid­
ered to have been approved and therefore EC type examination (module CB) is not necessary, provided
that the manufacturer demonstrates that tests and verification of interoperability constituents have been
considered successful for previous applications under comparable conditions and are in conformity
with the requirements of this TSI. In this case these assessments shall remain valid in the new applica­
tion. If it is not possible to demonstrate that the solution is positively proven in the past, the procedure
for interoperability constituents placed on the EU market after publication of this TSI applies.

(4) The conformity assessment of interoperability constituents shall cover the phases and characteristics as
indicated in Table 36 of Appendix A to this TSI.

6.1.3. Innovative solutions for interoperability constituents

If an innovative solution is proposed for an interoperability constituent, the procedure described in

Article 10 shall apply.

6.1.4. EC declaration of conformity for interoperability constituents

[Link]. I nt er op e ra bi l i t y c o ns t i t u en t s su bje ct to other E u ropea n U ni on Di r e cti v es

(1) Article 13(3) of Directive 2008/57/EC, states ‘Where the interoperability constituents are the subject of
other Community Directives covering other aspects, the EC declaration of conformity or suitability for
use shall, in such instances, state that the interoperability constituents also meet the requirements of
those other Directives.’

(2) According to Annex IV (3) of Directive 2008/57/EC, the EC declaration of conformity shall be accom­
panied by the statement setting out the condition of use.
L 356/44 EN Official Journal of the European Union 12.12.2014

[Link]. EC d ec la ra ti o n o f co nfor m ity for r ai ls

No statement setting out the conditions of use is required.

[Link]. EC d e cl ara t i on o f c onfor m i ty for ra i l fasten in g system s

The EC declaration of conformity shall be accompanied by statement setting out:

(a) the combination of rail, rail inclination, rail pad and type of sleepers with which the fastening system
may be used

(b) the maximum axle load the rail fastening system is designed to accommodate.

[Link]. E C d ec l a ra ti on of con for mi ty for tra ck sl eepe rs

The EC declaration of conformity shall be accompanied by statement setting out:

(a) the combination of rail, rail inclination and type of rail fastening system with which the sleeper may be
used,

(b) the nominal and design track gauge,

(c) the combinations of axle load and train speed the track sleeper is designed to accommodate.

6.1.5. Particular assessment procedures for interoperability constituents

[Link]. Ass es s m en t of ra i ls

Assessment of rail steel shall be done according to the following requirements:

(a) Rail hardness shall be tested for position RS according to EN 13674-1:2011 paragraph 9.1.8, measured
using one specimen (control sample out of production).

(b) Tensile strength shall be tested according to EN 13674-1:2011 paragraph 9.1.9, measured using one
specimen (control sample out of production).

(c) Fatigue test shall be done according to EN 13674-1:2011 paragraph 8.1 and paragraph 8.4.

[Link]. A ss es s m en t of s lee pers

(1) Until 31 May 2021 a design track gauge for track sleepers below 1 437 mm shall be allowed.

(2) For polyvalent gauge and multiple gauge track sleepers it is allowed not to assess the design track gauge
for the nominal track gauge of 1 435 mm.

6.2. Infrastructure subsystem

6.2.1. General provisions

(1) At the request of the applicant, the notified body carries out the EC verification of the infrastructure
subsystem in accordance with Article 18 of Directive 2008/57/EC and in accordance with the provi­
sions of the relevant modules.

(2) If the applicant demonstrates that tests or assessments of an infrastructure subsystem or parts of the
subsystem are the same as have been successful for previous applications of a design, the notified body
shall consider the results of these tests and assessments for the EC verification.

(3) The EC verification of the infrastructure subsystem shall cover the phases and characteristics indicated
in Table 37 in Appendix B to this TSI.

(4) Performance parameters as set out in point 4.2.1 of this TSI are not subject to the EC verification of
the subsystem.
12.12.2014 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 356/45

(5) Particular assessment procedures for specific basic parameters of infrastructure subsystem are set out in
point 6.2.4.

(6) The applicant shall draw up the EC declaration of verification for the infrastructure subsystem in
accordance with Article 18 and Annex V of Directive 2008/57/EC.

6.2.2. Application of modules

For the EC verification procedure of the infrastructure subsystem, the applicant may choose either:

(a) Module SG: EC verification based on unit verification, or

(b) Module SH1: EC verification based on full quality management system plus design examination.

[Link]. App l ic ati on of m od u le SG

In the case where EC verification is most effectively undertaken by using information collected by the infra­
structure manager, contracting entity or the main contractors involved (for example data obtained using
track recording vehicle or other measuring devices), the notified body shall take this information into
account to assess conformity.

[Link]. App l ic ati on o f m od u le SH1

The SH1 module may be chosen only where the activities contributing to the proposed subsystem to be
verified (design, manufacturing, assembling, installation) are subject to a quality management system for
design, production, final product inspection and testing, approved and surveyed by a notified body.

6.2.3. Innovative solutions

If an innovative solution is proposed for the infrastructure subsystem, the procedure described in Article 10
shall apply.

6.2.4. Particular assessment procedures for infrastructure subsystem

[Link]. As s es s m en t o f S tr u c t u re ga ug e

(1) Assessment of structure gauge as a design review shall be done against characteristic cross sections
using the results of calculations made by infrastructure manager or the contracting entity on the basis
of sections 5, 7, 10, Annex C and point D.4.8 of Annex D of EN 15273-3:2013.

(2) Characteristic cross sections are:

(a) track without cant,

(b) track with maximum cant,

(c) track with a civil engineering structure over the line

(d) any other location where the designed installation limit gauge is approached by less than 100 mm
or the installation nominal gauge or uniform gauge is approached by less than 50 mm.

(3) After assembly before putting into service clearances shall be verified at locations where the designed
installation limit gauge is approached by less than 100 mm or the installation nominal gauge or
uniform gauge is approached by less than 50 mm.

(4) Instead of point (1), for the 1 520 mm track gauge system assessment of structure gauge as a design
review is to be made against characteristic cross sections using the uniform structure gauge ‘S’ as
defined in Appendix H to this TSI.

(5) Instead of point (1), for the 1 600 mm track gauge system assessment of structure gauge as a design
review is to be made against characteristic cross sections using the structure gauge ‘IRL1’ as defined in
Appendix O to this TSI.
L 356/46 EN Official Journal of the European Union 12.12.2014

[Link]. As s es s me nt of d i st an ce betw een tra ck ce ntr es

(1) A design review for assessment of the distance between track centres shall be done using the results of
calculations made by the Infrastructure Manager or the contracting entity on the basis of chapter 9 of
EN 15273-3:2013. The nominal distance between track centres shall be checked at the line layout
where distances are given in parallel to the horizontal plane. The limit installation distance between
track centres shall be checked with the radius and relevant cant.

(2) After assembly before putting into service, distance between track centres shall be verified at critical
locations where the limit installation distance between track centres as defined according chapter 9 of
EN 15273-3:2013 is approached by less than 50 mm.

(3) Instead of point (1), for the 1 520 mm track gauge system a design review for assessment of the
distance between track centres is to be made using the results of calculations made by the infrastructure
manager or the contracting entity. The nominal distance between track centres shall be checked at the
line layout where distances are given in parallel to the horizontal plane. The limit installation distance
between track centres shall be checked with the radius and relevant cant.

(4) Instead of point (2), for the 1 520 mm track gauge system after assembly before putting into service,
distance between track centres shall be verified at critical locations where the limit installation distance
between track centres is approached by less than 50 mm.

[Link]. A ss es sm en t o f n om i na l tr ack gau ge

(1) Assessment of the nominal track gauge at design review shall be done by checking the self-declaration
of the applicant.

(2) Assessment of the nominal track gauge at assembly before putting into service shall be done by
checking the interoperability constituent sleeper's certificate. For non-certified interoperability constitu­
ents assessment of the nominal track gauge shall be done by checking the self-declaration of the
applicant.

[Link]. As s es s m en t of t ra ck l ayou t

(1) At design review the curvature, cant, cant deficiency and abrupt change of cant deficiency shall be
assessed against the local design speed.

(2) Assessment of switches and crossings layout is not required.

[Link]. A ss es sm en t o f c an t d e fi ci en cy for tra in s desi gn ed to travel wi th hi ghe r c a nt def i c i en c y

Point [Link](2) states that ‘It is permissible for trains specifically designed to travel with higher cant defi­
ciency (for example multiple units with lower axle loads; vehicles with special equipment for the negotia­
tion of curves) to run with higher cant deficiency values, subject to a demonstration that this can be
achieved safely’. This demonstration is outside the scope of this TSI and thus not subject to a notified body
verification of the infrastructure subsystem. The demonstration shall be undertaken by the RU, if necessary
in cooperation with the IM.

[Link]. Ass e ss m e n t of d e s i g n v a lu e s for eq u iva len t co ni ci ty

Assessment of design values for equivalent conicity shall be done using the results of calculations made by
the infrastructure manager or the contracting entity on the basis of EN 15302:2008+A1:2010.

[Link]. Ass e ss m e n t o f r ai l h ea d prof i le

(1) The design profile of new rails shall be checked against point [Link].

(2) Reused serviceable rails shall not be subject to the requirements for railhead profile as set out in
point [Link].

[Link]. A s se ss m e n t of sw i tc h es an d cr ossi n gs

Assessment of switches and crossings related to points [Link] to [Link] shall be done by checking that a
self-declaration of the infrastructure manager or contracting entity exists.
12.12.2014 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 356/47

[Link]. As s es s me nt of n ew s t r u ctu r es , ea r thwor ks a nd ear th pr es sure e ffec ts

(1) Assessment of new structures shall be done by checking the traffic loads and the track twist limit used
for design against the minimum requirements of points [Link] and [Link]. The notified body is not
required to review the design nor carry out any calculations. When reviewing the value of factor alpha
used in the design according to point [Link] it is only necessary to check that the value of factor alpha
satisfies Table 11.

(2) Assessment of new earthworks and earth pressure effects shall be done by checking the vertical loads
used for design according to requirements of point [Link]. When reviewing the value of factor alpha
used in the design according to point [Link] it is only necessary to check that the value of factor alpha
satisfies Table 11. The notified body is not required to review the design nor carry out any calculations.

[Link]. Ass e ssm e n t o f e x i s ti ng s tr u ctu r es

(1) Assessment of existing structures against the requirements of point [Link](3) (b) and (c) shall be done
by one of the following methods:

(a) check that the values of EN line categories, in combination with the allowed speed published or
intended to be published for the lines containing the structures, is in line with the requirements of
Appendix E of this TSI,

(b) check that the values of EN line categories, in combination with the allowed speed specified for the
structures or for the design, is in line with the requirements of Appendix E of this TSI,

(c) check the traffic loads specified for the structures or for the design against the minimum require­
ments of points [Link].1 and [Link].2. When reviewing the value of factor alpha according to
point [Link].1 it is only necessary to check that the value of factor alpha is in line with the value
of factor alpha mentioned in Table 11.

(2) It is not required to review the design nor carry out any calculations.

(3) For existing structures assessment point [Link](4) applies respectively.

[Link]. A ss es s m en t of pla tfor m of f s et

(1) Assessment of the distance between the track centre and the platform edge as a design review shall be
done using the results of calculations made by the Infrastructure Manager or the contracting entity on
the basis of chapter 13 of EN 15273-3:2013.

(2) After assembly before putting into service clearances shall be verified. The offset is checked at the ends
of the platform and every 30 m in straight track and every 10 m in curved track.

(3) Instead of point (1), for the 1 520 mm track gauge system assessment of the distance between the track
centre and the platform edge as a design review shall be done against requirements of point [Link].
Point (2) applies accordingly.

(4) Instead of point (1), for the 1 600 mm track gauge system assessment of the distance between the track
centre and the platform edge as a design review shall be done against requirements of point [Link](4).
Point (2) applies accordingly.

[Link]. A ss es sm en t o f m a x i mu m pre s su r e var i a tion s in tu nn el s

(1) Assessment of maximum pressure variation in the tunnel (10 kPa criterion) shall be done using the
results of numerical simulations according to chapters 4 and 6 of EN 14067-5:2006+A1:2010 made
by the infrastructure manager or the contracting entity on the basis of all expected operational condi­
tions with the trains complying with the Locomotives and Passengers TSI and intended to run at speeds
greater than or equal to 200 km/h in the specific tunnel to be assessed.

(2) The input parameters to be used are to be such that the reference characteristic pressure signature of
the trains set out in the locomotives and passenger rolling stock TSI is fulfilled.
L 356/48 EN Official Journal of the European Union 12.12.2014

(3) The reference cross section areas of the interoperable trains (constant along a train) to be considered is
to be, independently to each motor or trailer vehicle:

(a) 12 m2 for vehicles designed for GC and DE3 reference kinematic profile,

(b) 11 m2 for vehicles designed for GA and GB reference kinematic profile,

(c) 10 m2 for vehicles designed for G1 reference kinematic profiles.

The vehicle gauge to be considered shall be set on the basis of the gauges selected according to
point 4.2.1.

(4) The assessment may take into account construction features which reduce the pressure variation if any,
as well as the tunnel length.

(5) The pressure variations due to atmospheric or geographical conditions can be neglected.

[Link]. As se s s m en t of ef fec t of c r os s wi n ds

This demonstration of the safety is outside the scope of this TSI and thus not subject to a notified body
verification. The demonstration shall be undertaken by the infrastructure manager, if necessary in co­
operation with the railway undertaking.

[Link]. As s es s m en t of f i xe d i n st a l la t i on s for se r vi c i ng tr ai ns

Assessment of fixed installations for servicing trains is in the responsibility of the Member State concerned.

6.2.5. Technical solutions giving presumption of conformity at design stage

Presumption of conformity at design stage for technical solutions may be assessed prior and independent
from a specific project.

[Link]. As s es s m en t of t ra ck r e s is t an c e for pla i n li n e

(1) The demonstration of conformity of the track to the requirements of point 4.2.6 may be done by refer­
ence to an existing track design which meets the operating conditions intended for the subsystem
concerned.

(2) A track design shall be defined by the technical characteristics as set out in Appendix C.1 to this TSI
and by its operating conditions as set out in Appendix D.1 to this TSI.

(3) A track design is considered to be existing, if both of the following conditions are met:

(a) the track design has been in normal operation for at least one year and

(b) the total tonnage over the track was at least 20 million gross tons for the period of normal
operation.

(4) The operating conditions for an existing track design refer to conditions which have been applied in
normal operation.

(5) The assessment to confirm an existing track design shall be performed by checking that the technical
characteristics as set out in Appendix C.1 to this TSI and conditions of use as set out in Appendix D.1
to this TSI are specified and that the reference to the previous use of the track design is available.

(6) When a previously assessed existing track design is used in a project, the notified body shall only assess
that the conditions of use are respected.

(7) For new track designs that are based on existing track designs, a new assessment can be performed by
verifying the differences and evaluating their impact on the track resistance. This assessment may be
supported for example by computer simulation or by laboratory or in situ testing.

(8) A track design is considered to be new, if at least one of the technical characteristics set out in
Appendix C to this TSI or one of conditions of use set out in Appendix D to this TSI is changed.
12.12.2014 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 356/49

[Link]. As s es s me nt for s wi tc h es an d cr ossin g

(1) The provisions as set out in point [Link] are applicable for the assessment of track resistance for
switches and crossings. Appendix C.2 sets out the technical characteristics of switches and crossings
design and Appendix D.2 sets out the conditions of use of switches and crossings design.

(2) Assessment of design geometry of switches and crossings shall be done according to point [Link] of
this TSI.

(3) Assessment of maximum unguided length of fixed obtuse crossings shall be done according to
point [Link] of this TSI.

6.3. EC Verification when speed is used as a migration criterion

(1) Point 7.5 allows a line to be put into service at a lower speed than the ultimate intended speed. This
point sets out requirements for EC verification in this case.

(2) Some limiting values set out in section 4 depend on the intended speed of the route. Conformity
should be assessed at the intended ultimate speed; however it is permissible to assess speed dependant
characteristics at the lower speed at the time of placing in service.

(3) The conformity of the other characteristics for the intended speed of the route remains valid.

(4) To declare the interoperability at this intended speed, it is only necessary to assess the conformity of
the characteristics temporarily not respected, when they are brought up to the required level.

6.4. Assessment of maintenance file

(1) Point 4.5 requires the infrastructure manager to have for each interoperable line a maintenance file for
the infrastructure subsystem.

(2) The notified body shall confirm that the maintenance file exists and contains the items listed in
point 4.5.1. The notified body is not responsible for assessing the suitability of the detailed require­
ments set out in the maintenance file.

(3) The notified body shall include a reference to the maintenance file required by point 4.5.1 of this TSI in
the technical file referred to in Article 18(3) of Directive 2008/57/EC.

6.5. Subsystems containing Interoperability constituents not holding an EC declaration

6.5.1. Conditions

(1) Until 31 May 2021, a notified body is allowed to issue an EC certificate of verification for a subsystem
even if some of the interoperability constituents incorporated within the subsystem are not covered by
the relevant EC declarations of conformity and/or suitability for use according to this TSI, if the
following criteria are complied with:

(a) the conformity of the subsystem has been checked against the requirements of section 4 and in rela­
tion to sections 6.2 to 7 (except point 7.7 ‘Specific Cases’) of this TSI by the notified body. Further­
more the conformity of the ICs to section 5 and 6.1 does not apply, and

(b) the interoperability constituents, which are not covered by the relevant EC declaration of conformity
and/or suitability for use, have been used in a subsystem already approved and put in service in at
least one of the Member State before the entry in force of this TSI.

(2) EC declarations of conformity and/or suitability for use shall not be drawn up for the interoperability
constituents assessed in this manner.
L 356/50 EN Official Journal of the European Union 12.12.2014

6.5.2. Documentation

(1) The EC certificate of verification of the subsystem shall indicate clearly which interoperability constitu­
ents have been assessed by the notified body as part of the subsystem verification.

(2) The EC declaration of verification of the subsystem shall indicate clearly:

(a) Which interoperability constituents have been assessed as part of the subsystem;

(b) Confirmation that the subsystem contains the interoperability constituents identical to those verified
as part of the subsystem;

(c) For those interoperability constituents, the reason(s) why the manufacturer did not provide an EC
Declaration of conformity and/or suitability for use before its incorporation into the subsystem,
including the application of national rules notified under Article 17 of Directive 2008/57/EC.

6.5.3. Maintenance of the subsystems certified according to 6.5.1.

(1) During and after the transition period and until the subsystem is upgraded or renewed (taking into
account the decision of Member State on application of TSIs), the interoperability constituents which
do not hold an EC Declaration of conformity and/or suitability for use and are of the same type are
allowed to be used as maintenance related replacements (spare parts) for the subsystem, under the
responsibility of the body responsible for maintenance.

(2) In any case the body responsible for maintenance must ensure that the components for maintenance
related replacements are suitable for their applications, are used within their area of use and enable
interoperability to be achieved within the rail system while at the same time meeting the essential
requirements. Such components must be traceable and certified in accordance with any national or
international rule or any code of practice widely acknowledged in the railway domain.

6.6. Subsystem containing serviceable interoperability constituents that are suitable for reuse

6.6.1. Conditions

(1) A notified body is allowed to issue an EC certificate of verification for a subsystem even if some of the
interoperability constituents incorporated within the subsystem are serviceable interoperability constitu­
ents that are suitable for reuse, if the following criteria are complied with:

(a) the conformity of the subsystem has been checked against the requirements of section 4 and in rela­
tion to sections 6.2 to 7 (except point 7.7 ‘Specific Cases’) of this TSI by the notified body. Further­
more the conformity of the ICs to 6.1 does not apply, and

(b) the interoperability constituents are not covered by the relevant EC declaration of conformity and/
or suitability for use.

(2) EC declarations of conformity and/or suitability for use shall not be drawn up for the interoperability
constituents assessed in this manner.

6.6.2. Documentation

(1) The EC certificate of verification of the subsystem shall indicate clearly which interoperability constitu­
ents have been assessed by the notified body as part of the subsystem verification.

(2) The EC declaration of verification of the subsystem shall indicate clearly:

(a) Which interoperability constituents are serviceable interoperability constituents that are suitable for
reuse;

(b) Confirmation that the subsystem contains the interoperability constituents identical to those verified
as part of the subsystem.
12.12.2014 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 356/51

6.6.3. Use of serviceable interoperability constituents in maintenance

(1) Serviceable interoperability constituents that are suitable for reuse are allowed to be used as mainten­
ance related replacements (spare parts) for the subsystem, under the responsibility of the body respon­
sible for maintenance.

(2) In any case the body responsible for maintenance must ensure that the components for maintenance
related replacements are suitable for their applications, are used within their area of use, and enable
interoperability to be achieved within the rail system while at the same time meeting the essential
requirements. Such components must be traceable and certified in accordance with any national or
international rule, or any code of practice widely acknowledged in the railway domain.

7. IMPLEMENTATION OF THE INFRASTRUCTURE TSI

Member States shall develop a national plan for the implementation of this TSI, considering the coherence
of the entire rail system of the European Union. This plan shall include all projects subject to renewal and
upgrade of infrastructure subsystems, in line with the details mentioned in points 7.1 to 7.7 here below.

7.1. Application of this TSI to railway lines

Sections 4 to 6 and any specific provisions in points 7.2 to 7.6 here below apply in full to the lines within
the geographical scope of this TSI, which will be placed in service as interoperable lines after this TSI enters
into force.

7.2. Application of this TSI to new railway lines

(1) For the purpose of this TSI a ‘new line’ means a line that creates a route where none currently exists.

(2) The following situations, for example to increase speed or capacity, may be considered as an upgraded
line rather than a new line:

(a) the realignment of part of an existing route,

(b) the creation of a bypass,

(c) the addition of one or more tracks on an existing route, regardless of the distance between the
original tracks and the additional tracks.

7.3. Application of this TSI to existing railway lines

7.3.1. Upgrading of a line

(1) In accordance with Article 2(m) of Directive 2008/57/EC, ‘upgrading’ means any major modification
work on a subsystem or part of a subsystem which improves the overall performance of the subsystem.

(2) The infrastructure subsystem of a line is considered to be upgraded in the context of this TSI when at
least the performance parameters axle load or gauge, as defined in point 4.2.1, are changed in order to
meet the requirements of another traffic code.

(3) For other TSI performance parameters, according to Article 20(1) of the Directive 2008/57/EC,
Member States decide to what extent the TSI needs to be applied to the project.

(4) Where Article 20(2) of Directive 2008/57/EC applies because the upgrading is subject of an authorisa­
tion of placing into service, Member States shall decide which requirements of the TSI must be applied.

(5) Where article 20(2) of Directive 2008/57/EC does not apply because the upgrading is not subject of an
authorisation of placing into service, compliance with this TSI is recommended. Where compliance is
not possible to reach, the contracting entity shall inform the Member State of the reasons thereof.

(6) For a project including elements not being TSI compliant, the procedures for the assessment of con­
formity and EC verification to be applied should be agreed with the Member State.
L 356/52 EN Official Journal of the European Union 12.12.2014

7.3.2. Renewal of a line

(1) In accordance with Article 2(n) of Directive 2008/57/EC, ‘renewal’ means any major substitution work
on a subsystem or part subsystem which does not change the overall performance of the subsystem.

(2) For this purpose major substitution should be interpreted as a project undertaken to systematically
replace elements of a line or a section of a line. Renewal differs from a substitution in the framework of
maintenance, referred to in point 7.3.3 below, since it gives the opportunity to achieve a TSI compliant
route. A renewal is the same case as upgrading, but without a change in performance parameters.

(3) Where article 20(2) of Directive 2008/57/EC applies because the renewal is subject of an authorisation
of placing into service, Member States shall decide which requirements of the TSI must be applied.

(4) Where article 20(2) of Directive 2008/57/EC does not apply because the renewal is not subject of an
authorisation of placing into service, the conformity with this TSI is recommended. Where compliance
is not possible to reach, the contracting entity informs the Member State of the reasons thereof.

(5) For a project including elements not being TSI compliant, the procedures for the assessment of con­
formity and EC verification to be applied should be agreed with the Member State.

7.3.3. Substitution in the framework of maintenance

(1) Where the parts of a subsystem on a line are maintained, the formal verification and authorisation for
placing into service is not required in accordance with this TSI. However, maintenance replacements
should be, as far as it is reasonably practicable, undertaken in accordance with the requirements of this
TSI.

(2) The objective should be that maintenance replacements progressively contribute the development of an
interoperable line.

(3) In order to bring progressively an important part of the infrastructure subsystem in a process towards
interoperability, the following group of basic parameters should be adapted together:

(a) Line layout,

(b) Track parameters,

(c) Switches and crossings,

(d) Track resistance to applied loads,

(e) Structures resistance to traffic loads,

(f) Platforms.

(4) In such cases, it is noted that each of the above elements taken separetly cannot ensure compliance of
the whole subsystem. The conformity of a subsystem can only be stated when all the elements are
compliant with the TSI.

7.3.4. Existing lines that are not subject to a renewal or upgrading project

The demonstration of the level of compliance of existing lines with the basic parameters of the TSI is volun­
tary. The procedure for this demonstration shall be in accordance with Commission Recommendation
2014/881/EU of 18 November 2014 (1).

(1) Commission Recommendation 2014/881/EU of 18 November 2014 on the procedure for demonstrating the level of compliance of
existing railway lines with the basic parameters of the technical specifications for interoperability (See page 520 of this Official Journal).
12.12.2014 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 356/53

7.4. Application of this TSI to existing platforms

In case of upgrade or renewal of the infrastructure subsystem, the following conditions related to platform
height governed by point [Link] of this TSI, shall apply:

(a) It shall be allowed to apply other nominal platform heights for consistency with a particular upgrade or
renewal programme of a line or a section of a line.

(b) It shall be allowed to apply other nominal platform heights, if the work requires structural alterations
to any load bearing element.

7.5. Speed as an implementation criterion

(1) It is permissible to bring a line into service as an interoperable line at a lower speed than its intended
ultimate line speed. However, when it is the case the line should not be constructed in a way that inhi­
bits future adoption of the intended ultimate line speed.

(2) For example the distance between track centres shall be suitable for the intended ultimate line speed
but the cant will need to be appropriate to the speed at the time the line is brought into service.

(3) Requirements for assessment of conformity in this case are set out in section 6.3.

7.6. Ascertain Compatibility of infrastructure and rolling stock after authorisation of rolling stock

(1) Rolling stock complying with the rolling stock TSIs is not automatically compatible with all lines
complying with this Infrastructure TSI. For example, a GC gauge vehicle is not compatible with a GB
gauge tunnel. The process of ascertaining route compatibility to be followed shall be in accordance with
Commission Recommendation on the authorisation for the placing in service of structural subsystems
and vehicles under Directive 2008/57/EC (1).

(2) The design of the TSI categories of line as defined in section 4 is generally compatible with the opera­
tion of vehicles categorised in accordance with EN 15528:2008+A1:2012 at up to the maximum speed
as shown in Appendix E. However there may be a risk of excessive dynamic effects including resonance
in certain bridges which may further impact the compatibility of vehicles and infrastructure.

(3) Checks, based on specific operational scenarios agreed between the infrastructure manager and the
railway undertaking, may be undertaken to demonstrate the compatibility of vehicles operating above
the maximum speed shown in Appendix E.

(4) As stated in point 4.2.1 of this TSI, it is permissible to design new and upgraded lines such that they
will also accommodate larger gauges, higher axle loads, greater speeds, greater usable length of platform
and longer trains than those specified.

7.7. Specific cases

The following specific cases may be applied on particular networks. The specific cases are classified as:

(a) ‘P’ cases: permanent cases;

(b) ‘T’ cases: temporary cases, where it is recommended that the target system is reached by 2020 (an
objective set out in Decision No 1692/96/EC of the European Parliament and Council (2)).

7.7.1. Particular features on the Austrian network

[Link]. Pl a tfo r m h ei g h t ( 4. 2. 9. 2)

P cases

For other parts of the Union rail network as set out in Article 2(4) of this Regulation, for renewal and
upgrading, the nominal platform height of 380 mm above the running surface shall be allowed.

(1) Not yet published in the Official Journal.

(2) Decision No 1692/96/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 July 1996 on Community guidelines for the development
of the trans-European transport network (OJ L 228, 9.9.1996, p. 1), as amended by Decision No 884/2004/EC (OJ L 167, 30.4.2004,
p. 1).
L 356/54 EN Official Journal of the European Union 12.12.2014

7.7.2. Particular features on the Belgian network

[Link]. Pl at for m of fs e t ( 4 .2 .9. 3)

P cases

For platform heights of 550 mm an 760 mm, the conventional value bq0 of platform offset shall be calcu­
lated according to the following formulas:

5 000
bq0 ¼ 1 650 þ In curve with a radius 1 000 ≤ R ≤ ∞ (m)
R

bq0 ¼ 1 650 þ 26 470 − 21,5 In curve with a radius R < 1 000 (m)
R

7.7.3. Particular features on the Bulgarian network

[Link]. P la t for m h e ig h t ( 4 .2 .9 . 2)

P cases

For upgraded or renewed platforms, the nominal platform height of 300 mm and 1 100 mm above the
running surface shall be allowed.

[Link]. P l at for m of f s e t ( 4. 2. 9. 3)

P cases

Instead of points [Link](1) and [Link](2), the platform offset shall be:

(a) 1 650 mm for platforms with heights of 300 mm and

(b) 1 750 mm for platforms with height of 1 100 mm.

7.7.4. Particular features on the Danish network

[Link]. Pl a tfo r m h ei g h t ( 4. 2. 9. 2)

P cases

For S-Tog services the nominal platform height of 920 mm above the running surface shall be allowed.

7.7.5. Particular features on the Estonian network

[Link]. No m in a l tr ack g aug e ( 4. 2. 4 .1 )

P cases

Instead of point [Link](2), for the 1 520 mm track gauge system the nominal track gauge shall be either
1 520 mm or 1 524 mm.

[Link]. R e sis t a n c e o f n ew b r i d g e s t o t r a ff i c loa ds (4. 2. 7. 1)

P cases

For the 1 520 mm track gauge system, for lines with an axle load of 30 t, it shall be allowed to design
structures to support vertical loads in accordance with the load model set out in Appendix M to this TSI.

[Link]. T h e i m m ed i at e ac t i on l i m i t for sw it ches a n d cr ossi ng (4. 2. 8.6 )

P cases

Instead of sub-point [Link](3)(a), for the 1 520 mm track gauge system, the minimum value of bypass at
the narrowest location between open switch rail and stock rail is 54 mm.
12.12.2014 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 356/55

7.7.6. Particular features on the Finnish network

[Link]. TS I C a te g ori e s o f li n e ( 4. 2. 1)
P cases
Instead of gauges specified in the columns ‘Gauge’ in Table 2 and Table 3 of point 4.2.1(6), for the nominal
track gauge of 1 524 mm, it shall be allowed to use gauge FIN1.

[Link]. St r uc t u re g au g e (4 . 2. 3. 1)
P cases
(1) Instead of points [Link](1) and [Link](2), for the nominal track gauge of 1 524 mm, both the upper
and lower part of the structure gauge shall be set on the basis of the gauge FIN1. Those gauges are
defined in Annex D, section D4.4 of EN 15273-3:2013.
(2) Instead of point [Link](3), for the nominal track gauge of 1 524 mm, calculations of the structure
gauge shall be done using the static method in accordance with the requirements of sections 5, 6, 10
and Annex D Section D.4.4 of EN 15273-3:2013.
[Link]. Dist an c e be t we e n tra ck c ent res (4. 2. 3. 2)
P cases
(1) Instead of point [Link](1), for the nominal track gauge of 1 524 mm, the distance between track
centres shall be set on the basis of the gauge FIN1.
(2) Instead of point [Link](2), for the nominal track gauge of 1 524 mm, the nominal horizontal distance
between track centres for new lines shall be specified for the design and shall not be smaller than the
values mentioned in Table 21; it considers margins for aerodynamic effects.

Table 21
Minimum nominal horizontal distance between track centres

Minimum nominal horizontal distance between track

Maximum allowed speed [km/h]
centres [m]

v ≤ 120 4,10

120 < v ≤ 160 4,30

160 < v ≤ 200 4,50

200 < v ≤ 250 4,70

v > 250 5,00

(3) Instead of point [Link](3), for the nominal track gauge of 1 524 mm, the distance between track
centres shall at least satisfy the requirements for the limit installation distance between track centres,
defined according Annex D, Section D4.4.5 of EN 15273-3:2013.
[Link]. M in im u m r ad i u s of h or i zo n ta l cu r ve (4 .2 .3 .4 )
P cases
Instead of point [Link](3), for the nominal track gauge of 1 524 mm, reverse curves (other than reverse
curves in marshalling yards where wagons are shunted individually) with radii in the range from 150 m up
to 275 m for new lines shall be designed in accordance with Table 22 to prevent buffer locking.

Table 22
Limits for the length of a straight intermediate element between two long circular curves in the
opposite directions [m] (*)

Alignment chain (*) Limits for tracks for mixed traffic [m]

R = 150 m — straight — R = 150 m 16,9

R = 160 m — straight — R = 160 m 15,0

L 356/56 EN Official Journal of the European Union 12.12.2014

Alignment chain (*) Limits for tracks for mixed traffic [m]

R = 170 m — straight — R = 170 m 13,5

R = 180 m — straight — R = 180 m 12,2

R = 190 m — straight — R = 190 m 11,1

R = 200 m — straight — R = 200 m 10,00

R = 210 m — straight — R = 210 m 9,1

R = 220 m — straight — R = 220 m 8,2

R = 230 m — straight — R = 230 m 7,3

R = 240 m — straight — R = 240 m 6,4

R = 250 m — straight — R = 250 m 5,4

R = 260 m — straight — R = 260 m 4,1

R = 270 m — straight — R = 270 m 2,0

R = 275 m — straight — R = 275 m 0

(*) Note: For reverse curves with different radii the radius of the smaller curve shall be used when designing straight
element between the curves.

[Link]. No m in a l tra ck g au g e ( 4 .2 .4 .1 )

P cases

Instead of point [Link](1), the nominal track gauge shall be 1 524 mm.

[Link]. Ca nt ( 4 . 2. 4.2 )

P cases

(1) Instead of point [Link](1), for the nominal track gauge of 1 524 mm, the design cant shall not exceed
180 mm for ballasted or non-ballasted track.

(2) Instead of point [Link](3), for the nominal track gauge of 1 524 mm, new lines with mixed or freight
traffic on curves with a radius less than 320 m and a cant transition steeper than 1 mm/m, the cant
shall be restricted to the limit given by the following formula

D ≤ (R – 50) × 0,7

where D is the cant in mm and R is the radius in m.

[Link]. M ax im u m u n g u i d ed l en g th of f i xe d obtu se cr ossin gs (4 .2 . 5 .3 )

P cases

In paragraph (1) of Appendix J, for the nominal track gauge of 1 524 mm:

(a) Instead of subparagraph (J.1)(b), the minimum radius through obtuse crossing shall be 200 m; for
radius between 200-220 m small radius shall be compensated with track gauge widening

(b) Instead of subparagraph (J.1)(c), the minimum check rail height shall be 39 mm
12.12.2014 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 356/57

[Link]. T h e im m e d i at e ac ti on l im i t of tr ack gau ge a s a n i sola ted d efec t (4 . 2 .8 . 4 )

P cases

Instead of point [Link](1), for the nominal track gauge of 1 524 mm, the immediate action limits of track
gauge as an isolated defect are set out in Table 23.

Table 23

Immediate action limits of track gauge for the nominal track gauge of 1 524 mm

Speed [km/h] Dimensions [mm]

Minimum track gauge Maximum track gauge

v ≤ 60 1 515 1 554

60 < v ≤ 120 1 516 1 552

120 < v ≤ 160 1 517 1 547

160 < v ≤ 200 1 518 1 543

200 < v ≤ 250 1 519 1 539

v > 250 1 520 1 539

[Link]. T h e i m m e d ia t e ac t io n l i m it of ca nt (4 .2 .8 .5 )

P cases

Instead of point [Link](1), for the nominal track gauge of 1 524 mm, the maximum cant allowed in
service is 190 mm.

[Link]. T h e i m m e d ia te ac t io n l i m it s for sw i tche s a n d cr ossin gs (4. 2. 8. 6)

P cases

Instead of point [Link](1), for the nominal track gauge of 1 524 mm, the technical characteristics of
switches and crossings shall comply with the following in-service values:

(a) Maximum value of free wheel passage in switches: 1 469 mm.

This value can be increased if the Infrastructure Manager demonstrates that the actuation and locking
system of the switch is able to resist the lateral impact forces of a wheel set.

(b) Minimum value of fixed nose protection for common crossings: 1 476 mm.

This value is measured 14 mm below the running surface, and on the theoretical reference line, at an
appropriate distance back from the actual point (RP) of the nose as indicated in Figure 2.

For crossings with point retraction, this value can be reduced. In this case the Infrastructure Manager
shall demonstrate that the point retraction is sufficient to guarantee that the wheel will not hit the nose
at the actual point (RP).

(c) Maximum value of free wheel passage at crossing nose: 1 440 mm.

(d) Maximum value of free wheel passage at check rail/wing rail entry: 1 469 mm.

(e) Minimum flangeway width: 42 mm.

(f) Minimum flangeway depth: 40 mm.

(g) Maximum excess height of check rail: 55 mm.

L 356/58 EN Official Journal of the European Union 12.12.2014

[Link]. Pl at for m of f se t ( 4 .2 .9 .3)

P cases
Instead of point [Link](1), for the nominal track gauge of 1 524 mm, the distance between the track
centre and the platform edge, parallel to the running plane, shall be set on the basis of the installation limit
gauge and is defined in chapter 13 of EN 15273-3:2013. The instllation limit gauge shall be set on the
basis of the gauge FIN1. The minimum distance of bq, calculated as in chapter 13 of EN15273-3:2013 is
herafter refered to as bqlim.

[Link]. Tra i n e xt er n a l c l ea n in g f ac il i ti es (4. 2 .1 2. 3)

P cases
Instead of point [Link](1), for the nominal track gauge of 1 524 mm, where a washing plant is provided
it shall be able to clean the outer sides of single or double-deck trains between a height of:
(a) 330 to 4 367 mm for a single-deck train,
(b) 330 to 5 300 mm for double-deck trains.
[Link]. Ass es s m e nt o f st r u c t ur e gaug e (6. 2 .4 .1 )
P cases
Instead of point [Link](1), for the nominal track gauge of 1 524 mm, assessment of structure gauge as a
design review shall be done against characteristic cross sections using the results of calculations made by
the Infrastructure Manager or the contracting entity on the basis of sections 5, 6, 10 and Annex D,
Section D.4.4 of EN 15273-3:2013.

7.7.7. Particular features on the French network

[Link]. Pl at fo r m h e ig h t ( 4 .2 . 9. 2)
P cases
For the rail network of Ile-de-France the nominal platform height of 920 mm above the running surface
shall be allowed.

7.7.8. Particular features on the German network

[Link]. Pl a tfor m h eig h t (4 . 2. 9. 3)
P cases
For S-Bahn services the nominal platform height of 960 mm above the running surface shall be allowed.

7.7.9. Particular features on the Hellenic network

[Link]. Pl a t for m h ei g h t ( 4. 2. 9. 2 )
P cases
The nominal platform height shall be allowed to be 300 mm above the running surface.

7.7.10. Particular features on the Italian network

[Link]. P l a t fo r m of f s et ( 4. 2. 9 .3 )
P cases
Instead of point [Link](1), for the platforms with the height of 550 mm, the distance bqlim [mm] between
the the track centre and the platform edge, parallel to the running plane, shall be calculated from the
formula:
(a) on straight track and inside the curves:
bqlim = 1 650 + 3 750/R + (g – 1 435)/2 + 11,5

(b) outside the curves:

bqlim = 1 650 + 3 750/R + (g – 1 435)/2 + 11,5 + 220 * tanδ

where R is the radius of the track, in metres, g is the track gauge, δ is the angle of the cant with the
horizontal line.
12.12.2014 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 356/59

[Link]. Eq uiv a l e nt c on i ci ty ( 4 .2. 4. 5)

P cases

(1) Instead of point [Link].(3) design values of track gauge, rail head profile and rail inclination for plain
line shall be selected to ensure that the equivalent conicity limits set out in Table 24 are not exceeded.

Table 24

Equivalent conicity design limit values

Wheel profile

Speed range [km/h] S1002, GV1/40 EPS

v ≤ 60 Assessment not required

60 < v ≤ 200 0,25 0,30

200 < v ≤ 280 0,20 N.A.

v > 280 0,10 N.A.

(2) Instead of point [Link]. (4) the following wheelsets shall be modelled passing over the designed track
conditions (simulated by calculation according to EN 15302:2008+A1:2010):

(a) S 1002 as defined in Annex C of EN 13715:2006+A1:2010 with SR1.

(b) S 1002 as defined in Annex C of EN 13715:2006+A1:2010 with SR2.

(c) GV 1/40 as defined in Annex B of EN 13715:2006+A1:2010 with SR1.

(d) GV 1/40 as defined in Annex B of EN 13715:2006+A1:2010 with SR2.

(e) EPS as defined in Annex D of EN 13715:2006+A1:2010 with SR1.

For SR1 and SR2 the following values apply:

(f) For the 1 435 mm track gauge system SR1 = 1 420 mm and SR2 = 1 426 mm.

[Link]. E qu iv a l en t c o n ic it y i n s e r v i c e (4 .2 . 11 .2 )

P cases

Instead of point [Link].(2) the infrastructure manager shall measure the track gauge and the railhead
profiles at the site in question at a distance of approximate 10 m. The mean equivalent conicity over
100 m shall be calculated by modelling with the wheelsets (a) – (e) mentioned in paragraph [Link] (2) of
this TSI in order to check for compliance, for the purpose of the joint investigation, with the limit equiva­
lent conicity for the track specified in Table 14.

7.7.11. Particular features on the Latvian network

[Link]. R es i st a nc e of n e w b r i d g e s t o tr af fi c lo a ds — ver ti ca l l oad s ( 4. 2. 7. 1.1)

P cases

(1) For sub-point [Link].1(1)(a), for the 1 520 mm track gauge system, load model 71 shall be applied
with a distributed load qvk of 100 kN/m.

(2) Instead of point [Link].1(3), for the 1 520 mm track gauge system, the value of factor alpha (α) shall
in all cases be equal to 1,46.
L 356/60 EN Official Journal of the European Union 12.12.2014

7.7.12. Particular features on the Polish network

[Link]. T SI C at eg o r i es of l i ne (4 .2 .1 )
P cases
In point 4.2.1(7), Table 2 line P3, instead of gauge DE3, on upgraded or renewed railway lines in Poland
gauge G2 is allowed.

[Link]. Dist a nc e be t w e en tr ack c en tres (4. 2. 3. 2)

P cases
Instead of point [Link](4), for 1 520 mm track gauge, for station tracks for direct reloading of goods from
wagon to wagon the nominal horizontal minimum distance of 3,60 m shall be allowed.

[Link]. M i ni m um ra d i u s of ho r i zon tal cu r ve ( 4.2 .3 .4 )

P cases
Instead of point [Link](3), for the 1 520 mm track gauge, on tracks other than main tracks, reverse curves
with radii in the range from 150 m up to 250 m shall be designed with a section of straight track of at
least 10 m between the curves.

[Link]. M in im u m r ad i u s o f v er tic al cu r ve (4. 2. 3. 5)

P cases
Instead of point [Link](3), for the 1 520 mm track gauge, the radius of vertical curves (except the marshal­
ling yards) shall be at least 2 000 m both on a crest and in a hollow.

[Link]. C a n t d e f i ci e n c y ( 4 .2 .4 .3 )
P cases
Instead of point [Link](3), for all types of rolling stock of the 1 520 mm track gauge the cant deficiency
shall not exceed 130 mm.

[Link]. Ab r u pt ch an ge of c an t d e fi c ien cy (4. 2.4 .4 )

P cases
Instead of point [Link](3), for 1 520 mm track gauge, requirements of points [Link](1) and [Link](2)
shall be applied.

[Link]. T h e im m ed i a te a c ti on li m it for tra ck twi st (4 . 2. 8. 3)

P cases
Instead of point [Link](4) and [Link](5), for 1 520 mm track gauge points from [Link](1) to [Link](3)
shall be applied.

[Link]. Th e im m ed i a te ac ti on l im i t of tr ack gauge a s a n i sola ted d efec t (4 . 2 .8 . 4 )

P cases
Instead of requirements of Table 13 in point [Link](2) the limit values for 1 520 mm track gauge in
Poland are given in following table:

Table 25
Immediate action limits of track gauge for 1 520 mm track gauge in Poland

Speed [km/h] Dimensions [mm]

Minimum track gauge Maximum track gauge

v < 50 1 511 1 548

50 ≤ v ≤ 140 1 512 1 548

v > 140 1 512 1 536

12.12.2014 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 356/61

[Link]. T h e im m e d i at e ac ti on l im i ts for swi tc hes a nd c rossi ngs (4 .2 . 8 .6 )

P cases

(1) Instead of sub-point [Link](1)(d), for certain types of switches of R = 190 m and crossings with slants
of 1:9 and 1:4,444 the maximum value of free wheel passage at check rail/wing rail entry of
1 385 mm shall be allowed.

(2) Instead of point [Link](3), for the 1 520 mm track gauge the technical characteristics of switches and
crossings shall comply with the following in-service values:

(a) Maximum value of free wheel passage in switches: 1 460 mm.

This value can be increased if the Infrastructure Manager demonstrates that the actuation and
locking system of the switch is able to resist the lateral impact forces of a wheelset.

(b) Minimum value of fixed nose protection for common crossings: 1 472 mm.

This value is measured 14 mm below the running surface, and on the theoretical reference line, at
an appropriate distance back from the actual point (RP) of the nose as indicated in Figure 2.

For crossings with point retraction, this value can be reduced. In this case the Infrastructure
Manager shall demonstrate that the point retraction is sufficient to guarantee that the wheel will not
hit the nose at the actual point (RP).

(c) Maximum value of free wheel passage at crossing nose: 1 436 mm.

(d) Minimum flangeway width: 38 mm.

(e) Minimum flangeway depth: 40 mm.

(f) Maximum excess height of check rail: 55 mm.

[Link]. P la t for m h e ig h t ( 4 .2 .9 .2 )

P cases

(1) For platforms used for urban or suburban railway services the nominal platform height of 960 mm
above running surface shall be allowed.

(2) For upgraded or renewed lines with maximum speed of no more than 160 km/h the nominal platform
height from 220 mm to 380 mm above running surface shall be allowed.

[Link]. E qu iv al en t c on i c it y i n s e r v i ce (4 .2 .11 .2 )

T cases

Until introduction of equipment for measurement of elements required for calculation of equivalent conicity
in service, it is allowed in Poland not to assess this parameter.

[Link]. Tr a ck s le e pers ( 5 .3 .3 )

P cases

The requirement of point 5.3.3(2) shall be applied for speeds above 250 km/h.
L 356/62 EN Official Journal of the European Union 12.12.2014

7.7.13. Particular features on the Portuguese network

[Link]. Str u c tu re g au g e ( 4 .2 .3 .1 )

P cases

(1) Instead of point [Link](1), for the nominal track gauge of 1 668 mm, the upper part of the structure
gauge shall be set on the basis of the gauges set out in Table 26 and Table 27, which are defined in
Annex D Section D.4.3 of EN 15273-3:2013.

Table 26

Portuguese gauges for passenger traffic

Traffic code Gauge

P1 PTc

P2 PTb+

P3 PTc

P4 PTb+

P5 PTb

P6 PTb

Table 27

Portuguese gauges for freight traffic

Traffic code Gauge

F1 PTc

F2 PTb+

F3 PTb

F4 PTb

(2) Instead of point [Link](2), for the nominal track gauge of 1 668 mm the lower part of the structure
gauge shall be in accordance with Annex D Section D.4.3.4 of EN 15273-3:2013.

(3) Instead of point [Link](3), for the nominal track gauge of 1 668 mm, calculations of the structure
gauge shall be done using the kinematic method in accordance with the requirements of Annex D
Section D.4.3. of EN 15273-3:2013.

[Link]. Di st an c e bet w een tr ack c e n t res (4. 2 .3 .2 )

P cases

Instead of point [Link](1), for the nominal track gauge of 1 668 mm, the distance between track centres
shall be set on the basis of the reference contours PTb, PTb+ or PTc, which are defined in Annex D
Section D.4.3 of EN 15273-3:2013.
12.12.2014 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 356/63

[Link]. T h e im m e d i at e ac ti on l im i t of tr ack gau ge a s a n i sola ted d efec t (4 . 2 .8 . 4 )

P cases

Instead of point [Link](1), for the nominal track gauge of 1 668 mm, the immediate action limits of track
gauge as an isolated defect are set out in Table 28.

Table 28

Immediate action limits of Portuguese track gauge

Speed [km/h] Dimensions [mm]

Minimum track gauge Maximum track gauge

v ≤ 120 1 657 1 703

120 < v ≤ 160 1 658 1 703

160 < v ≤ 230 1 661 1 696

v > 230 1 663 1 696

[Link]. The im m ed i at e ac ti on l i m i t for swi t ches an d c r ossi n gs (4 .2 .8 .6 )

P cases

Instead of point [Link](1), for the nominal track gauge of 1 668 mm, the technical characteristics of
switches and crossings shall comply with the following in-service values:

(a) Maximum value of free wheel passage in switches: 1 618 mm.

This value can be increased if the Infrastructure Manager demonstrates that the actuation and locking
system of the switch is able to resist the lateral impact forces of a wheelset.

(b) Minimum value of fixed nose protection for common crossings: 1 625 mm.

This value is measured 14 mm below the running surface, and on the theoretical reference line, at an
appropriate distance back from the actual point (RP) of the nose as indicated in Figure 2.

For crossings with point retraction, this value can be reduced. In this case the Infrastructure Manager
shall demonstrate that the point retraction is sufficient to guarantee that the wheel will not hit the nose
at the actual point (RP).

(c) Maximum value of free wheel passage at crossing nose: 1 590 mm.

(d) Maximum value of free wheel passage at check rail/wing rail entry: 1 618 mm.

(e) Minimum flangeway width: 38 mm.

(f) Minimum flangeway depth: 40 mm.

(g) Maximum excess height of check rail: 70 mm.

[Link]. Pl at for m h ei g h t ( 4. 2 .9 .2 )

P cases

For the nominal track gauge of 1 668 mm, for upgraded or renewed platforms the nominal platform
height of 685 and 900 mm above the running surface for radii of more than 300 m shall be allowed.
L 356/64 EN Official Journal of the European Union 12.12.2014

[Link]. Pl at for m of f se t ( 4 .2 .9 .3)

P cases

(1) Instead of point [Link](1), for the nominal track gauge of 1 668 mm, the distance between the
track centre and the platform edge parallel to the running plane (bq), as defined in chapter 13 of
EN 15273-3:2013, shall be set on the basis of the installation limit gauge (bqlim). The installation limit
gauge shall be calculated on the basis of the gauge PTb+ defined in Annex D, Section D 4.3 of
EN 15273-3:2013.

(2) For a three-rail track, the installation limit gauge shall be the outside envelope resultant from the over­
laying of the installation gauge centred on the track gauge 1 668 mm, and the installation gauge set
in [Link](1) centred on the track gauge 1 435 mm.

[Link]. A s s es s m en t of s tr u c tu r e gau g e (6. 2.4 .1 )

P cases

Instead of point [Link](1), for the nominal track gauge of 1 668 mm, assessment of structure gauge as a
design review shall be done against characteristic cross sections using the results of calculations made by
the Infrastructure Manager or the contracting entity on the basis of chapters 5, 7, 10 and section D.4.3 of
EN 15273-3:2013.

[Link]. A s s es s m en t of m axi m u m p r es su r e va r i a t i ons i n tu nn el s (6. 2 .4 .1 2)

P cases

Instead of point [Link](3), for the nominal track gauge of 1 668 mm, the reference cross section area
(constant along a train) to be considered is to be, independently to each motor or trailer vehicle:

(a) 12 m2 for vehicles designed for PTc reference kinematic profile,

(b) 11 m2 for vehicles designed for PTb and PTb+ reference kinematic profile.

The vehicle gauge to be considered shall be set on the basis of the gauge selected according to
point [Link].

7.7.14. Particular features on the Ireland network

[Link]. S tr u c t u re g au g e ( 4. 2. 3 .1 )

P cases

Instead of point [Link](5), for the nominal track gauge of 1 600 mm, it shall be allowed to apply the
uniform structure gauge IRL2 as set out in Appendix O to this TSI.

[Link]. Dis t an c e b e tw e en tr ack c e nt r es (4. 2.3 .2 )

P cases

Instead of point [Link](6), for the 1 600 mm track gauge, the distance between track centres shall be set
on the basis of the gauges selected according to point [Link]. The nominal horizontal distance between
track centres shall be specified for the design and shall not be less than 3,47 m for gauge IRL2; it considers
margins for aerodynamic effects.

[Link]. A ss e s sm en t of s t r uc tu re ga u g e (6 .2 .4 .1 )

P cases

Instead of point [Link](5), for the 1 600 mm track gauge, assessment of structure gauge as a design review
is to be made against characteristic cross sections using the structure gauge ‘IRL2’ as defined in Appendix O
to this TSI.
12.12.2014 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 356/65

7.7.15. Particular features on the Spanish network

[Link]. St r uc tu re g au g e ( 4 .2 .3 .1 )

P cases

(1) Instead of point [Link](1), for the nominal track gauge of 1 668 mm, the upper part of the structure
gauge for new lines shall be set on the basis of the gauges set out in Table 29 and Table 30 which are
defined in Annex D, Section D.4.11 of EN 15273-3:2013.

Table 29

Gauges for passenger traffic on the Spanish network

Traffic code Gauge of upper parts

P1 GEC16

P2 GEB16

P3 GEC16

P4 GEB16

P5 GEB16

P6 GHE16

Table 30

Gauges for freight traffic on the Spanish network

Traffic code Gauge of upper parts

F1 GEC16

F2 GEB16

F3 GEB16

F4 GHE16

For renewed or upgraded lines the upper part of the structure gauge shall be set on the basis of the
gauge GHE16 which is defined in Annex D, Section D.4.11 of EN 15273-3:2013.

(2) Instead of point [Link](2), for the nominal track gauge of 1 668 mm the lower part of the structure
gauge shall be GEI2 as set out in Appendix P to this TSI. Where tracks are equipped with rail brakes,
structure gauge GEI1 shall be applied for the lower part of the gauge, as set out in Appendix P to this
TSI.

(3) Instead of point [Link](3), for the nominal track gauge of 1 668 mm calculations of the structure
gauge shall be done using the kinematic method in accordance with the requirements of Annex D,
Section D.4.11 of EN 15273-3:2013 for the upper parts and Appendix P to this TSI for the lower
parts.

[Link]. Di st an ce b et w een tr ack c e n t res (4 .2 .3 .2 )

P cases

Instead of point [Link](1), for the nominal track gauge of 1 668 mm, the distance between track centres
shall be set on the basis of gauges of upper parts GHE16, GEB16 or GEC16, which are defined in Annex D,
Section D.4.11 of EN 15273-3:2013.
L 356/66 EN Official Journal of the European Union 12.12.2014

[Link]. De si g n t ra ck tw i st d u e to r ai l tr af f i c ac ti ons (4. 2. 7. 1. 6)

P cases

Instead of point [Link].6, for the nominal track gauge of 1 668 mm, the maximum total design track twist
due to rail traffic actions shall not exceed 8mm/3m.

[Link]. T he i mm e di a t e a ct i on li mi t of tra ck gau ge as an i sol ated defec t (4 . 2 .8 . 4 )

P cases

Instead of point [Link](1), for the nominal track gauge of 1 668 mm, the immediate action limits of track
gauge as an isolated defect are set out in Table 31.

Table 31

Immediate action limits of 1 668 mm track gauge

Dimensions [mm]
Speed [km/h]
Minimum track gauge Maximum track gauge

v ≤ 80 1 659 1 698

80 < v ≤ 120 1 659 1 691

120 < v ≤ 160 1 660 1 688

160 < v ≤ 200 1 661 1 686

200 < v ≤ 240 1 663 1 684

240 < v ≤ 280 1 663 1 682

280 < v ≤ 320 1 664 1 680

320 < v ≤ 350 1 665 1 679

[Link]. T h e i m m e d i at e ac t i on l i m i ts for sw i tc hes a nd cr ossin gs (4. 2. 8. 6)

P cases

Instead of point [Link](1), for the nominal track gauge of 1 668 mm, the technical characteristics of
switches and crossings shall comply with the following in-service values:

(a) Maximum value of free wheel passage in switches: 1 618 mm.

This value can be increased if the Infrastructure Manager demonstrates that the actuation and locking
system of the switch is able to resist the lateral impact forces of a wheelset.

(b) Minimum value of fixed nose protection for common crossings: 1 626 mm.

This value is measured 14 mm below the running surface, and on the theoretical reference line, at an
appropriate distance back from the actual point (RP) of the nose as indicated in Figure 2.

For crossings with point retraction, this value can be reduced. In this case the Infrastructure Manager
shall demonstrate that the point retraction is sufficient to guarantee that the wheel will not hit the nose
at the actual point (RP).
12.12.2014 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 356/67

(c) Maximum value of free wheel passage at crossing nose: 1 590 mm.

(d) Maximum value of free wheel passage at check rail/wing rail entry: 1 620 mm.

(e) Minimum flangeway width: 38 mm.

(f) Minimum flangeway depth: 40 mm.

(g) Maximum height of check rail: 70 mm.

[Link]. Pl at fo r m he i g ht ( 4. 2. 9. 2)

P cases

The nominal platform height dedicated for:

(a) commuter or regional traffic or

(b) commuter and long-distance traffic

(c) regional traffic and long-distance traffic

stopping in normal service, shall be allowed to be 680 mm for radii of 300 m and more above the running
surface.

[Link]. Pl at for m of f se t ( 4. 2. 9.3 )

P cases

(1) Instead of point [Link](1), for the nominal track gauge of 1 668 mm, the distance between the
track centre and the platform edge, parallel to the running plane (bq), as defined in chapter 13 of
EN 15273-3:2013, shall be set on the basis of the installation limit gauge (bqlim). The installation limit
gauge shall be calculated on the basis of the gauges of upper parts GHE16 or GEC16 defined in
Annex D, Section D.4.11 of EN 15273-3:2013.

(2) For a three-rail track, the installation limit gauge shall be the outside envelope resultant from the over­
laying of the installation limit gauge centred on the track gauge 1 668 mm, and the installation limit
gauge set in [Link](1) centred on the track gauge 1 435 mm.

[Link]. As s es s me nt of s tr u c tur e gau g e (6 .2 .4 .1 )

P cases

Instead of point [Link](1), for the nominal track gauge of 1 668 mm, assessment of structure gauge as a
design review shall be done against characteristic cross sections using the results of calculations made by
the Infrastructure Manager or the contracting entity on the basis of chapters 5, 7, 10 and Annex D,
Section D.4.11 of EN 15273-3:2013 for the upper parts and Appendix P to this TSI for the lower parts.

[Link]. As s es s me nt of m ax im u m p r es su re va r i a ti on s i n tu n n els (6 . 2. 4. 12 )

P cases

Instead of point [Link](3), for the nominal track gauge of 1 668 mm, the reference cross section area to
be considered is to be, independently to each motor or trailer vehicle:

(a) 12 m2 for vehicles designed for GEC16 reference kinematic profile,

(b) 11 m2 for vehicles designed for GEB16, and GHE16 reference kinematic profile.

The vehicle gauge to be considered shall be set on the basis of the gauge selected according to
point [Link].
L 356/68 EN Official Journal of the European Union 12.12.2014

7.7.16. Particular features on the Swedish network

[Link]. Ge ne r al

P cases

On infrastructure with direct connection to the Finnish network and for infrastructure in harbours, the par­
ticular features of the Finnish network as specified in point 7.7.6 of this TSI may be applied on tracks,
which are dedicated for 1 524 mm nominal track gauge vehicles.

[Link]. Pl a tfo r m of f s et ( 4. 2. 9. 3)

P cases

As set out in point [Link](1), the distance between the track centre and the platform edge parallel to the
running plane (bq), as defined in chapter 13 of EN 15273-3:2013, shall be calculated with the following
values for allowed additional overthrow (Skin):

(a) on the inside of the curve: Skin = 40,5/R,

(b) on the outside of the curve: Skin = 31,5/R.

7.7.17. Particular features on the UK network for Great Britain

[Link]. T S I c a teg or i es of l in e ( 4. 2. 1)

P cases

(1) Where line speeds are stated in kilometres per hour [km/h] as a category or performance parameter in
this TSI, it shall be allowed to translate the speed to equivalent miles per hour [mph] as in Appendix G,
for the United Kingdom national network in Great Britain.

(2) Instead of the column ‘Gauge’ in Table 2 and Table 3 of point 4.2.1(7), for the gauge of all lines except
new, dedicated high speed lines of traffic code P1, it shall be allowed to use national technical rules as
set out in Appendix Q.

[Link]. St r u ct u re g aug e ( 4 .2 .3 . 1)

P cases

Instead of point [Link], for national gauges selected according to point [Link](2), the structure gauge
shall be set according to Appendix Q.

[Link]. Di s ta n c e b et wee n tr ack c en t re s (4 .2 .3 .2 )

P cases

(1) Instead of point [Link], the nominal distance between track centres shall be 3 400 mm on straight
track and curved track with a radius of 400 m or greater.

(2) Where topographical constraints prevent a nominal distance of 3 400 mm between track centres being
achieved, it is permissible to reduce the distance between track centres provided special measures are
put in place to ensure a safe passing clearance between trains.

(3) Reduction in the distance between track centres shall be in accordance with the national technical rule
set out in Appendix Q.
12.12.2014 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 356/69

[Link].bis Eq uiv a l e nt c on i ci ty ( 4 .2. 4. 5)

P cases
(1) Instead of point [Link].(3) design values of track gauge, rail head profile and rail inclination for plain
line shall be selected to ensure that the equivalent conicity limits set out in Table 32 are not exceeded

Table 32
Equivalent conicity design limit values

Wheel profile

Speed range [km/h] S1002, GV1/40 EPS

v ≤ 60 Assessment not required

60 < v ≤ 200 0,25 0,30

200 < v ≤ 280 0,20 0,20

v > 280 0,10 0,15

(2) Instead of point [Link]. (4) the following wheelsets shall be modelled passing over the designed track
conditions (simulated by calculation according to EN 15302:2008+A1:2010):
(a) S 1002 as defined in Annex C of EN 13715:2006+A1:2010 with SR1.
(b) S 1002 as defined in Annex C of EN 13715:2006+A1:2010 with SR2.
(c) GV 1/40 as defined in Annex B of EN 13715:2006+A1:2010 with SR1.
(d) GV 1/40 as defined in Annex B of EN 13715:2006+A1:2010 with SR2.
(e) EPS as defined in Annex D of EN 13715:2006+A1:2010 with SR1.
For SR1 and SR2 the following values apply:
(f) For the 1 435 mm track gauge system SR1 = 1 420 mm and SR2 = 1 426 mm.
[Link]. M ax i m u m u n g ui d e d l en g th o f f i xe d ob tu se c rossi n gs (4 .2 .5 .3 )
P cases
Instead of point [Link], the design value of the maximum unguided length of fixed obtuse crossing shall
be in accordance with the national technical rule set out in Appendix Q.

[Link]. T h e im m ed i at e ac t i on l i m i ts for sw i tc hes a nd cr ossi ngs ( 4. 2. 8. 6)

P cases
Instead of point [Link](1)(b), for the ‘CEN56 Vertical’ design of switches and crossings, a minimum value
of fixed nose protection for common crossings of 1 388 mm is allowed (measured 14 mm below the
running surface, and on the theoretical reference line, at an appropriate distance back from the actual (RP)
of the nose as indicated in Figure 2).

[Link]. P l at for m h ei g h t ( 4. 2. 9. 2 )
P cases
Instead of point [Link], for platform height, national technical rules as set out in Appendix Q shall be
allowed.

[Link]. Pl at fo r m of f se t ( 4. 2. 9. 3)
P cases
Instead of point [Link], for platform offset, national technical rules as set out in Appendix Q shall be
allowed.
L 356/70 EN Official Journal of the European Union 12.12.2014

[Link]. Eq uiv a l e nt c on i ci ty i n s er v ic e (4. 2. 11 .2 )

P cases

Instead of point [Link].(2) the infrastructure manager shall measure the track gauge and the railhead
profiles at the site in question at a distance of approximate 10 m. The mean equivalent conicity over
100 m shall be calculated by modelling with the wheelsets (a) — (e) mentioned in paragraph [Link](2) of
this TSI in order to check for compliance, for the purpose of the joint investigation, with the limit equiva­
lent conicity for the track specified in Table 14.

[Link]. A ss es s m e nt of st r u c tu re ga u ge (6 .2 .4 .1 )

P cases

Instead of point [Link], it shall be allowed to assess structure gauge in accordance with the national tech­
nical rules as set out in Appendix Q.

[Link]. A ss es s m en t of d i s ta nc e bet wee n tr ack c entr es (6 .2 .4 .2 )

P cases

Instead of point [Link], it shall be allowed to assess distance between track centres in accordance with the
national technical rules as set out in Appendix Q.

[Link]. As s es sm en t o f pl at for m of fs e t (6 .2 .4 .1 1)

P cases

Instead of point [Link], it shall be allowed to assess platform offset in accordance with the national tech­
nical rules as set out in Appendix Q.

7.7.18. Particular features on the UK network for Northern Ireland

[Link]. S tr u c t u re g au g e ( 4 .2 .3 .1 )

P cases

Instead of point [Link](5), for the nominal track gauge of 1 600 mm, it shall be allowed to apply the
uniform structure gauge IRL3 as set out in Appendix O to this TSI.

[Link]. Dis t an ce bet we e n tra ck c entr es (4. 2. 3. 2)

P cases

Instead of point [Link](6), for the 1 600 mm track gauge, the distance between track centres shall be set
on the basis of the gauges selected according to point [Link]. The nominal horizontal distance between
track centres shall be specified for the design and shall consider margins for aerodynamic effects. The
minimum allowed value for the uniform structure gauge IRL3 is an open point.

[Link]. As se ss m en t o f s tr u ctu r e gau g e (6. 2. 4. 1)

P cases

Instead of point [Link](5), for the 1 600 mm track gauge, assessment of structure gauge as a design review
is to be made against characteristic cross sections using the structure gauge ‘IRL3’ as defined in Appendix O
to this TSI.

7.7.19. Particular features on the Slovak network

[Link]. T SI c at eg o r i e s o f li ne ( 4 .2 .1 )

P cases

For the Traffic Code F1520 as defined in Table 3 of point 4.2.1(7), for the 1 520 mm track gauge system,
it shall be allowed to use axle load 24,5 t and train length in the range from 650 m up to 1 050 m.
12.12.2014 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 356/71

[Link]. M in im u m rad i u s o f h or i zonta l c u r ve (4. 2. 3. 4 )

P cases

(1) Instead of point [Link](2), reverse curves (other than reverse curves in marshalling yards where
wagons are shunted individually) with radii in the range from 150 m up to 300 m for new lines shall
be designed in accordance with Table 33 and Table 34 to prevent buffer locking.

(2) Instead of paragraph [Link](3), for the 1 520 mm track gauge system, for main tracks, reverse curves
with radii in the range from 150 m up to 250 m shall be designed with a section of straight track of at
least 15 m between the curves.

(3) Instead of point [Link](3), for the 1 520 mm track gauge system, for tracks other than main tracks,
reverse curves with radii in the range from 150 m up to 250 m shall be designed in accordance with
Table 33 and Table 34.

Table 33

Limits for length of a straight intermediate element between two long circular curves in the
opposite directions (m)

R1/R2 150 160 170 180 190 200 220 230 250 280 300

150 11,0 10,7 10,4 10,0 9,8 9,5 9,0 8,7 8,1 7,6 6,7

160 10,7 10,4 10,0 9,8 9,5 9,0 8,6 8,1 7,6 6,7 6,4

170 10,4 10,0 9,8 9,5 9,0 8,5 8,1 7,6 6,7 6,4 6,0

180 10,0 9,8 9,5 9,0 8,5 8,0 7,5 6,6 6,4 6,0 5,5

190 9,8 9,5 9,0 8,5 8,0 7,5 6,5 6,3 6,0 5,4 4,5

200 9,5 9,0 8,5 8,0 7,5 6,5 6,2 6,0 5,3 4,0 3,0

220 9,0 8,6 8,1 7,5 6,5 6,2 6,0 5,3 4,0 3,0 0,0

230 8,7 8,1 7,6 6,6 6,3 6,0 5,3 4,0 3,0 0,0

250 8,1 7,6 6,7 6,4 6,0 5,3 4,0 3,0 0,0

280 7,6 6,7 6,4 6,0 5,4 4,0 3,0 0,0

300 6,7 6,4 6,0 5,5 4,5 3,0 0,0

325 6,4 6,0 5,7 5,0 4,0 0,0

350 6,3 5,8 5,2 4,0 3,0 0,0

400 6,0 5,2 4,0 3,0 0,0

450 5,5 4,5 3,0 0,0

500 5,0 3,0 0,0

600 3,0 0,0

700 0,0
L 356/72 EN Official Journal of the European Union 12.12.2014

Table 34
Limits for length of a straight intermediate element between two long circular curves in the
opposite directions (m); for passenger trains with speeds up to 40 km/h for other tracks than
main tracks
R1/R2 150 160 170 180 190 200 220 230 250

150 11,0 10,7 10,4 10,0 9,8 9,5 9,0 8,7 8,1

160 10,7 10,4 10,0 9,8 9,5 9,0 8,6 8,1 7,6

170 10,4 10,0 9,8 9,5 9,0 8,5 8,1 7,6 6,7

180 10,0 9,8 9,5 9,0 8,5 8,0 7,5 6,6 6,4

190 9,8 9,5 9,0 8,5 8,0 7,5 6,5 6,3 6,0

200 9,5 9,0 8,5 8,0 7,5 6,7 6,2 6,0 5,3

220 9,0 8,6 8,1 7,5 6,5 6,2 6,0 5,3 4,0

230 8,7 8,1 7,6 6,6 6,3 6,0 5,3 4,0 4,0

250 8,1 7,6 6,7 6,4 6,0 5,3 4,0 4,0 4,0

280 7,6 6,7 6,4 6,0 5,4 4,0 4,0 4,0 4,0

300 6,7 6,4 6,0 5,5 4,5 4,0 4,0 4,0 4,0

325 6,4 6,0 5,7 5,0 4,0 4,0 4,0 4,0 4,0

350 6,3 5,8 5,2 4,0 4,0 4,0 4,0 4,0 4,0

400 6,0 5,2 4,0 4,0 4,0 4,0 4,0 4,0 4,0

450 5,5 4,5 4,0 4,0 4,0 4,0 4,0 4,0 4,0

500 5,0 4,0 4,0 4,0 4,0 4,0 4,0 4,0 4,0

600 4,0 4,0 4,0 4,0 4,0 4,0 4,0 4,0 4,0

[Link]. Min i m u m r ad i u s o f v er t ic a l c u r v e ( 4. 2.3. 5)

P cases

(1) Instead of point [Link](1), only for side track with maximum speed up to 10 km/h, the radius of
vertical curves (except for humps in marshalling yards) shall be at least 500 m in both in a crest and in
a hollow.

(2) Instead of point [Link](3), for 1 520 mm track gauge system, the radius of vertical curves (except the
marshalling yards) shall be at least 2 000 m both on a crest and in a hollow, in cramped conditions
(e.g. insufficient space) at least 1 000 m both on a crest and in hollow.

(3) For side track with maximum speed up to 10 km/h, it shall be allowed to use the radius of vertical
curves at least 500 m both on a crest and in a hollow.

(4) Instead of point [Link](4), for the 1 520 mm track gauge system for humps in marshalling yards the
radius of vertical curves shall be at least 300 m on a crest and 250 m in a hollow.

[Link]. Ca n t d e f i c i en cy ( 4 .2 .4 . 3)

P cases

Instead of point [Link](3), for all types of rolling stock of the 1 520 mm track gauge system the cant defi­
ciency shall not exceed 137 mm. For passenger traffic, this limit is valid for speeds up to 230 km/h. For
mixed traffic, this limit is valid for speed up to 160 km/h.
12.12.2014 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 356/73

[Link]. T h e im m e d i at e ac ti on l im i t for tra ck tw ist (4. 2. 8. 3)

P cases

Instead of point [Link](4) and [Link](5), for the 1 520 mm track gauge system, points from [Link](1) to
[Link](3) shall be applied.

[Link]. T h e i m m e d i at e a ct i on li mi t of tra ck gau ge as an i sol ated d efec t (4 . 2 .8 . 4 )

P cases

Instead of point [Link](2), for 1 520 mm track gauge system, the immediate action limits of track gauge as
an isolated defects are set out in Table 35.

Table 35

Immediate action limits of track gauge for 1 520 mm track gauge system in Slovak republic

Speed [km/h] Dimensions [mm]

Minimum track gauge Maximum track gauge

v ≤ 80 1 511 1 555

80 < v ≤ 120 1 512 1 550

120 < v ≤ 160 1 513 1 545

160 < v ≤ 230 1 514 1 540

[Link]. T he i m m ed i at e a c t io n li m i t for ca nt (4 .2. 8. 5)

P cases

Instead of point [Link](3), for the 1 520 mm track gauge system, the maximum cant allowed in service is
170 mm.

[Link]. T h e i m m ed ia te a c t io n l im it s for sw i tc hes a nd crossi ngs ( 4. 2. 8. 6)

P cases

Instead of point [Link](3), for the 1 520 mm track gauge system, the technical characteristics of switches
and crossings shall comply with the following in-service values:

(a) Minimum value of bypass at the narrowest location between open switch rail and stock rail is 60 mm.

(b) Minimum value of fixed nose protection for common crossings is 1 472 mm. This value is measured
14 mm below the running surface, and on the theoretical reference line, at an appropriate distance
back from the actual point (RP) of the nose as indicated in Figure 2. For crossings with point retraction,
this value can be reduced. In this case the Infrastructure Manager shall demonstrate that the point
retraction is sufficient to guarantee that the wheel will not hit the nose at the actual point (RP).

(c) Maximum value of free wheel passage at crossing nose is 1 436 mm

(d) Minimum flangeway width is 40 mm

(e) Minimum flangeway depth is 40 mm

(f) Maximum excess height of check rail is 54 mm

L 356/74 EN Official Journal of the European Union 12.12.2014

[Link]. Pl at for m h ei g ht ( 4 .2 .9 .2)

P cases
For renewed lines with maximum speed of no more than 120 km/h the nominal platform height shall be
allowed from 200 mm to 300 mm above the running surface.

[Link]. E qu iv al en t co n i c it y i n s er v i ce (4 .2. 11 .2 )
T cases
Until introduction of equipment for measurement of elements required for calculation of equivalent conicity
in service, it is allowed in Slovak republic not to assess this parameter.

[Link]. Tr ac k s l eepe r s ( 5. 3. 3)
P cases
The requirement of point 5.3.3(2) shall be applied for speeds above 250 km/h.
12.12.2014 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 356/75

Appendix A

Assessment of interoperability constituents

The characteristics of the interoperability constituents to be assessed by the notified body or the manufacturer in accord­
ance with the selected module, in the different phases of design, development and production, are marked by ‘X’ in
Table 36. Where no assessment is required, this is marked by ‘n.a.’ in the table.
There are no particular assessment procedures required for interoperability constituents of the infrastructure subsystem.

Table 36
Assessment of interoperability constituents for the EC declaration of conformity

Assessment in the following phase

Production phase
Manufacturing
Design and development phase
process + product
Characteristics to be assessed
test

Review of
Product quality
Design review manufacturing Type test
(series)
process

5.3.1 The rail

[Link] Railhead profile X n.a. X X

[Link] Rail hardness X X X X

5.3.2 The rail fastening systems n.a. n.a. X X

5.3.3 Track sleepers X X n.a. X

L 356/76 EN Official Journal of the European Union 12.12.2014

Appendix B

Assessment of the infrastructure subsystem

The characteristics of the subsystem to be assessed in the different phases of design, construction and operation are
marked by ‘X’ in Table 37.

Where no assessment by a notified body is required, this is marked by ‘n.a.’ in the table. This does not prevent the need
for other assessments to be performed in the framework of other phases.

Definition of assessment phases:

(1) ‘Design review’: it includes checking of correctness of values/parameters against applicable TSI requirements related
to the final design.

(2) ‘Assembly before putting into service’: checking on site that the actual product or subsystem complies with the rele­
vant design parameters just before putting it into operation.

Column 3 gives references to point 6.2.4 ‘Particular assessment procedures for subsystem’ and to point 6.2.5 ‘Technical
solutions giving presumption of conformity at design stage’.

Table 37

Assessment of the infrastructure subsystem for the EC verification of conformity

New line or upgrading/renewal project

Particular assessment
Assembly before procedures
Characteristics to be assessed Design review
putting into service

1 2 3

Structure gauge ([Link]) X X [Link]

Distance between track centres ([Link]) X X [Link]

Maximum gradients ([Link]) X n.a.

Minimum radius of horizontal curve ([Link]) X X [Link]

Minimum radius of vertical curve ([Link]) X n.a. [Link]

Nominal track gauge ([Link]) X X [Link]

Cant ([Link]) X X [Link]

Cant deficiency ([Link]) X n.a. [Link]

[Link]

Abrupt change of cant deficiency ([Link]) X n.a. [Link]

Assessment of design values for equivalent conicity X n.a. [Link]

([Link])

Railhead profile for plain line ([Link]) X n.a. [Link]

Rail inclination ([Link]) X n.a.

12.12.2014 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 356/77

New line or upgrading/renewal project

Particular assessment
Assembly before procedures
Characteristics to be assessed Design review
putting into service

1 2 3

Design geometry of switches and crossings ([Link]) X n.a. [Link]

Use of swing nose crossings ([Link]) X n.a. [Link]

Maximum unguided length of fixed obtuse crossings X n.a. [Link]

([Link])

Track resistance to vertical loads ([Link]) X n.a. 6.2.5

Longitudinal track resistance ([Link]) X n.a. 6.2.5

Lateral track resistance ([Link]) X n.a. 6.2.5

Resistance of new bridges to traffic loads ([Link]) X n.a. [Link]

Equivalent vertical loading for new earthworks and X n.a. [Link]

earth pressure effects ([Link])

Resistance of new structures over or adjacent to X n.a. [Link]

tracks ([Link])

Resistance of existing bridges and earthworks to X n.a. [Link]

traffic loads ([Link])

The immediate action limit for alignment ([Link]) n.a. n.a.

The immediate action limit for longitudinal level n.a. n.a.

([Link])

The immediate action limit for track twist ([Link]) n.a. n.a.

The immediate action limit of track gauge as an n.a. n.a.

isolated defect ([Link])

The immediate action limit for cant ([Link]) n.a n.a.

The immediate action limit for switches and cross­ n.a. n.a.
ings ([Link])

Usable length of platforms ([Link]) X n.a.

Platform height ([Link]) X X

Platform offset ([Link]) X X [Link]

Track layout along platforms ([Link]) X n.a.

Maximum pressure variation in tunnels ([Link]) X n.a. [Link]

Effect of crosswinds ([Link]) n.a. n.a. [Link]

Location markers ([Link]) n.a. n.a.

L 356/78 EN Official Journal of the European Union 12.12.2014

New line or upgrading/renewal project

Particular assessment
Assembly before procedures
Characteristics to be assessed Design review
putting into service

1 2 3

Equivalent conicity in service ([Link]) n.a. n.a.

Toilet discharge ([Link]) n.a. n.a [Link]

Train external cleaning facilities ([Link]) n.a. n.a. [Link]

Water restocking ([Link]) n.a. n.a. [Link]

Refuelling ([Link]) n.a. n.a. [Link]

Electric shore supply ([Link]) n.a. n.a [Link]

Application of Interoperability Constituents n.a. X

12.12.2014 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 356/79

Appendix C

Technical characteristics of track design and switches and crossings design

Appendix C.1

Technical characteristics of track design

Track design shall be at least defined by the technical characteristics as follows:

(a) Rail
— Profile(s) & grades
— Continuous welded rail or length of rails (for jointed track sections)
(b) Fastening system
— Type
— Pad stiffness
— Clamping force
— Longitudinal restraint
(c) Sleeper
— Type
— Resistance to vertical loads:
— Concrete: design bending moments
— Wood: compliance to EN 13145:2001
— Steel: moment of inertia of cross section
— Resistance to longitudinal and lateral loads: geometry and weight
— Nominal and design track gauge
(d) Rail inclination
(e) Ballast cross sections (ballast shoulder — ballast thickness)
(f) Ballast type (grading = granulometrie)
(g) Sleeper spacing
(h) Special devices: for example sleeper anchors, third/fourth rail, …
L 356/80 EN Official Journal of the European Union 12.12.2014

Appendix C.2

Technical characteristics of switches and crossings design

Switches and crossings design shall be at least defined by the technical characteristics as follows:
(a) Rail
— Profile(s) & grades (switch rail, stock rail)
— Continuous welded rail or length of rails (for jointed track sections)
(b) Fastening system
— Type
— Pad stiffness
— Clamping force
— Longitudinal restraint
(c) Sleeper
— Type
— Resistance to vertical loads:
— Concrete: design bending moments
— Wood: compliance to EN 13145:2001
— Steel: moment of inertia of cross section
— Resistance to longitudinal and lateral loads: geometry and weight
— Nominal and design track gauge
(d) Rail inclination
(e) Ballast cross sections (ballast shoulder — ballast thickness)
(f) Ballast type (grading = granulometrie)
(g) Type of crossing (fixed or movable point)
(h) Type of locking (switch pannel, movable point of crossing)
(i) Special devices: for example sleeper anchors, third/fourth rail, …
(j) Generic switches and crossings drawing indicating
— Geometrical diagram (triangle) describing the length of the turnout and the tangents at the end of the turnout
— Main geometrical characteristics like the main radii in switch, closure and crossing panel, crossing angle
— Sleeper spacing
12.12.2014 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 356/81

Appendix D

Conditions of use of track design and switches and crossings design

Appendix D.1

Conditions of use of track design

Conditions of use of track design are defined to be as follows:

(a) Maximum axle load [t]
(b) Maximum line speed [km/h]
(c) Minimum horizontal curve radius [m]
(d) Maximum cant [mm]
(e) Maximum cant deficiency [mm]

Appendix D.2

Conditions of use of switches and crossings design

Conditions of use of switches and crossings design are defined to be as follows:

(a) Maximum axle load [t]
(b) Maximum line speed [km/h] on through route and diverging track of switches
(c) Rules for curved turnouts based on generic designs, giving minimum curvatures (for through route and diverging
track of switches)
L 356/82 EN Official Journal of the European Union 12.12.2014

Appendix E

Capability requirements for structures according to traffic code

The minimum capability requirements for structures are defined in Table 38 and Table 39 according to the traffic codes
given in Table 2 and Table 3. The capability requirements are defined in Table 38 and Table 39 by a combined quantity
comprising of the EN line category and a corresponding maximum speed. The EN line category and associated speed
shall be considered as a single combined quantity.

EN line category is a function of axle load and geometrical aspects relating to the spacing of axles. EN line categories are
set out in Annex A of EN 15528:2008+A1:2012.

Table 38

EN Line Category –Associated Speed (1) (6) [km/h] — Passenger traffic

Passenger Carriages
Electric or Diesel Multiple
(including Coaches, Vans Locomotives and Power
Traffic code Units, Power Units and
and Car Carriers) and Light Heads (2) (4)
Railcars (2) (3)
Freight Wagons (2) (3)

P1 Open point

P2

P3a (> 160 km/h) A – 200 D2 – 200 (11) Open point

B1 – 160

P3b (≤ 160 km/h) B1 – 160 D2 – 160 C2 (8) – 160

D2 (9) – 120

P4a (> 160 km/h) A – 200 D2 – 200 (11) Open point

B1 – 160

P4b (≤ 160 km/h) A – 160 D2 – 160 B1 (7) – 160

B1 – 140 C2 (8) – 140
D2 (9) – 120

P5 B1 – 120 C2 – 120 (5) B1 (7) – 120

P6 a12 (10)

P1520 Open point

P1600 Open point

Table 39

EN Line Category –Associated Speed (1) (6) [km/h] — Freight traffic

Traffic code Freight wagons and other vehicles Locomotives (2)

F1 D4 – 120 D2 – 120

F2 D2 – 120 D2 – 120
12.12.2014 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 356/83

Traffic code Freight wagons and other vehicles Locomotives (2)

F3 C2 – 100 C2 – 100

F4 B2 – 100 B2 – 100

F1520 Open point

F1600 Open point

Notes:
(1) The indicated speed value in the table represents the maximum requirement for the line and may be lower in accordance with the
requirements in point 4.2.1(10). When checking individual structures on the line, it is acceptable to take account of the type of
vehicle and local allowed speed.
(2) Passenger Carriages (including Coaches, Vans, Car Carriers), Other Vehicles, Locomotives, Power Heads, Diesel and Electric Multiple
Units, Power Units and Railcars are defined in the RST TSI. Light Freight Wagons are defined as vans except that they are allowed
to be conveyed in formations which are not intended to convey passengers.
(3) The requirements for structures are compatible with Passenger Coaches, Vans, Car Carriers, Light Freight Wagons and vehicles in
Diesel and Electric Multiple Units and Power Units with a length of; 18 m to 27,5 m for conventional and articulated vehicles and
with a length of 9 m to 14 m for regular single axles.
(4) The requirements for structures are compatible with up to two adjacent coupled locomotives and/or power heads. The require­
ments for structures are compatible with a maximum speed of 120 km/h for three or more adjacent coupled locomotives and/or
power heads (or a train of locomotives and/or power heads) subject to the locomotives and/or power heads satisfying the corre­
sponding limits for freight wagons.
(5) For traffic code P5 the Member State may indicate whether the requirements for locomotives and power heads apply.
(6) When checking the compatibility of individual trains and structures, the basis of the compatibility check shall be in accordance
with Appendix K to this TSI.
(7) The requirements for structures are compatible with an average mass per unit length over the length of each coach/vehicle of
2,75 t/m
(8) The requirements for structures are compatible with an average mass per unit length over the length of each coach/vehicle of
3,1 t/m
(9) The requirements for structures are compatible with an average mass per unit length over the length of each coach/vehicle of
3,5 t/m
(10) See Appendix L to this TSI
(11) Only 4 axle vehicles allowed. The spacing of the axles in a bogie shall be at least 2,6 m. The average mass per unit length over the
length of the vehicle shall not exceed 5,0 t/m.
L 356/84 EN Official Journal of the European Union 12.12.2014

Appendix F

Capability requirements for structures according to traffic code in the United Kingdom of Great
Britain and Northern Ireland

The minimum capability requirements for structures are defined in Table 40 and Table 41 according to the traffic codes
given in Table 2 and Table 3. The capability requirements are defined in Table 40 and Table 41 by a combined quantity
comprising of the Route Availability number and a corresponding maximum speed. The Route Availability number and
associated speed shall be considered as a single combined quantity.

The Route Availability number is a function of axle load and geometrical aspects relating to the spacing of axles. Route
Availability numbers are defined in the national technical rules notified for this purpose.

Table 40

Route Availability number –Associated Speed (1) (5) [miles per hour] — Passenger traffic

Passenger Carriages
Electric or Diesel Multiple
(including Coaches, Vans Locomotives and Power
Traffic code Units, Power Units and
and Car Carriers) and Light Heads (2) (4)
Railcars (2) (3) (6)
Freight Wagons (2) (3) (6)

P1 Open point

P2

P3a (> 160 km/h) RA1 – 125 RA7 – 125 (7) Open point
RA2 – 90 RA8 – 110 (7)
RA8 – 100 (8)
RA5 – 125 (9)

P3b (≤ 160 km/h) RA1 – 100 RA8 – 100 (8) RA3 – 100
RA2 – 90 RA5 – 100 (9)

P4a (> 160 km/h) RA1 – 125 RA7 – 125 (7) Open point
RA2 – 90 RA7 – 100 ( )8

RA4 – 125 (9)

P4b (≤ 160 km/h) RA1 – 100 RA7 – 100 (8) RA3 – 100
RA2 – 90 RA4 – 100 ( )9

P5 RA1 – 75 RA5 – 75 (8) (10) RA3 – 75

RA4 – 75 (9) (10)

P6 RA1

P1600 Open point

Table 41

Route Availability number — Associated Speed (1) (5) [miles per hour] — Freight traffic

Traffic code Freight wagons and other vehicles Locomotives (2) (4) (8)

F1 RA8 – 75 RA7 – 75

F2 RA7 – 75 RA7 – 75
12.12.2014 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 356/85

Traffic code Freight wagons and other vehicles Locomotives (2) (4) (8)

F3 RA5 – 60 RA7 – 60

F4 RA4 – 60 RA5 – 60

F1600 Open point

Notes:
(1) The indicated speed value in the table represents the maximum requirement for the line and may be lower in accordance with the
requirements in point 4.2.1(10). When checking individual structures on the line, it is acceptable to take account of the type of
vehicle and local allowed speed.
(2) Passenger Carriages (including Coaches, Vans, Car Carriers), Other Vehicles, Locomotives, Power Heads, Diesel and Electric Multiple
Units, Power Units and Railcars are defined in the RST TSI. Light Freight Wagons are defined as vans except that they are allowed
to be conveyed in formations which are not intended to convey passengers.
(3) The requirements for structures are compatible with Passenger Coaches, Vans, Car Carriers, Light Freight Wagons and vehicles in
Diesel and Electric Multiple Units and Power Units with a length of; 18 m to 27,5 m for conventional and articulated vehicles and
with a length of 9 m to 14 m for regular single axles.
(4) The requirements for structures are compatible with up to two adjacent coupled locomotives and/or power heads. The require­
ments for structures are compatible up to a maximum speed of 75 mph for up to five adjacent coupled locomotives and/or power
heads (or a train of locomotives and/or power heads) subject to the locomotives and/or power heads satisfying the corresponding
limits for freight wagons.
(5) When checking the compatibility of individual trains and structures, the basis of the compatibility check shall be in accordance
with Appendix K except where modified by the national technical rules notified for this purpose.
(6) The requirements for structures are compatible with an average mass per unit length over the length of each coach/vehicle of
3,0 t/m
(7) Only 4 axle vehicles allowed. The spacing of the axles in a bogie shall be at least 2,6 m. The average mass per unit length over the
length of the vehicle shall not exceed 4,6 t/m.
(8) 4 or 6 axle vehicles allowed.
()
9 Powerhead, only 4 axle vehicles allowed. Also includes locomotives where difference in length between locomotive and hauled
vehicles is less than 15 % of length of hauled vehicles for speeds over 90 mph.
(10) For traffic code P5 the Member State may indicate whether the requirements for locomotives and power heads apply.
L 356/86 EN Official Journal of the European Union 12.12.2014

Appendix G

Speed conversion to miles per hour for Ireland and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and
Northern Ireland

Table 42
Speed conversion from [km/h] to [mph]

Speed [km/h] Speed [mph]

2 1

3 1

5 3

10 5

15 10

20 10

30 20

40 25

50 30

60 40

80 50

100 60

120 75

140 90

150 95

160 100

170 105

180 110

190 120

200 125

220 135

225 140

230 145

250 155

280 175

300 190

320 200

350 220
12.12.2014 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 356/87

Appendix H

Structure gauge for the 1 520 mm track gauge system

Figure 3

Structure gauge S for the 1 520 mm track gauge system [dimensions in mm]

Clarifications for Figure 3:

All horizontal dimensions shall be measured from the centre of the track, and all vertical dimensions shall be measured
from the top of the rail head level.

Left side of contour — applications for tracks in the railway station, stop/halt and for branch tracks/industry track
(except contour Ia, Ib, IIa, IIIa),

Right side of contour — applications for tracks on the plain line.

Application of specific parts of the contour:

1,I — 1, I — contour of structure gauge for non-electrified tracks,

1,I — II — III — II — 1,I — contour of structure gauge for electrified tracks — for tracks on the plain (open) line and
for tracks in the railway station and for branch/industry tracks, where standing of vehicles is not expected,

Ia — Ib — IIa — IIIa — contour of structure gauge for electrified tracks — for other station tracks and other branch/
industry tracks

Note: Values of 1 000 mm, 1 020 mm, 6 900 mm and 6 400 mm given in the numerators are for contact system with
carrying cable.
L 356/88 EN Official Journal of the European Union 12.12.2014

Values of 1 100 mm, 1 120 mm, 6 750 mm and 6 250 mm given in the denominator are for contact system without
carrying cable,
11 — 10 — 3 — contour of structure gauge for structures and equipment (except tunnel, bridge, platform, ramp) on
the outside of ‘edge’ tracks;
9 — 4a — contour of structure gauge for tunnel, for railing on the bridge, elevated track (ballast profile), signals,
embankment wall and for railing on the other structures of railway subgrade,
12-12 — contour from which (on track between stations or in stations within usale length of track) any device could
not be above (higher), except level crossing covering, locomotive signaling inductors, switches mechanism and their near
situated signaling and safety equipment
14-14 — contour of building (or foundation), underground cables, steel cables, pipes and other not railway structures
(except signalling and safety equipment)
For nominal track gauge of 1 520 mm a1 = 670 mm and a2 = 760 mm.

For nominal track gauge of 1 524 mm a1 = 672 mm and a2 = 762 mm.

Figure 4

Reference profile of the lower parts on tracks fitted with double slip

Clarification for Figure 4:

The distance of 760 mm is for track gauge 1 520 mm, and 762 mm for track gauge 1 524 mm.

Figure 5

Reference profile of the lower parts on marshalling yards fitted with rail brakes
12.12.2014 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 356/89

Appendix I

Reverse curves with radii in the range from 150 m up to 300 m

The values in Table 43 are based on a reference vehicle (basic passenger coach with a distance between bogie pivots
a = 19 m and distance between the buffer face and the bogie pivot nt = 3,7 m, buffer width Δ = 635 mm and transversal
play of the vehicle w = +/– 60 mm) and an end throw difference of 395 mm for two adjacent basic passenger coaches.

The values in Table 44 are based on a reference vehicle (basic freight wagon with a distance between end axles or bogie
pivots 12 m and distance between the buffer face and the end axle or bogie pivot 3 m) and an end throw difference of
225 mm for two adjacent basic freight wagons.

Due to local settings it can be necessary to require a longer length of the intermediate element or special operational
conditions or a bigger width of the buffer to prevent buffer locking for existing vehicles that do not fulfil these
assumptions.

Table 43

Minimum length of a straight intermediate element between two long circular curves in the opposite
directions [m]

R1
150 155 160 165 170 175 180 185 190 195 200 205 210 215 220
R2

150 10,78 10,53 10,29 10,06 9,83 9,6 9,38 9,16 8,94 8,73 8,52 8,31 8,11 7,91 7,71

160 10,29 9,86 9,48 9,22 8,97 8,73 8,49 8,25 8,02 7,79 7,56 7,34 7,12 6,91 6,69

170 9,83 9,37 8,97 8,62 8,3 8,04 7,78 7,53 7,28 7,04 6,8 6,55 6,31 6,06 5,81

180 9,38 8,91 8,49 8,12 7,78 7,48 7,2 6,93 6,65 6,37 6,08 5,79 5,49 5,18 4,86

190 8,94 8,45 8,02 7,63 7,28 6,96 6,65 6,33 6 5,67 5,33 4,97 4,59 4,19 3,76

200 8,52 8,01 7,56 7,16 6,8 6,44 6,08 5,71 5,33 4,93 4,5 4,04 3,54 2,97 2,28

210 8,11 7,59 7,12 6,7 6,31 5,91 5,49 5,06 4,59 4,09 3,54 2,91 2,11 0,73 0

220 7,71 7,17 6,69 6,25 5,81 5,35 4,86 4,34 3,76 3,1 2,28 0,95 0 0 0

230 7,32 6,77 6,27 5,79 5,29 4,76 4,18 3,52 2,74 1,67 0 0 0 0 0

240 6,95 6,38 5,85 5,32 4,74 4,11 3,38 2,5 1,07 0 0 0 0 0 0

250 6,58 5,99 5,42 4,81 4,14 3,36 2,39 0,51 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

260 6,22 5,6 4,97 4,26 3,46 2,44 0,36 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

270 5,86 5,2 4,48 3,66 2,64 0,86 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

280 5,51 4,78 3,96 2,96 1,45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

290 5,15 4,33 3,37 2,06 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

300 4,77 3,85 2,68 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

L 356/90 EN Official Journal of the European Union 12.12.2014

R1
150 155 160 165 170 175 180 185 190 195 200 205 210 215 220
R2

310 4,37 3,31 1,75 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

320 3,95 2,67 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

330 3,47 1,85 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

340 2,94 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

350 2,3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

360 1,41 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

370 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

380 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Table 44

Limits, for dedicated freight lines, for the length of a straight intermediate element between two long circular
curves in the opposite directions [m]

R1
150 155 160 165 170 175 180 185 190 195 200
R2

150 6,79 6,61 6,43 6,25 6,09 5,92 5,76 5,60 5,44 5,28 5,13

160 6,43 6,20 6,01 5,82 5,63 5,45 5,26 5,07 4,89 4,70 4,51

170 6,09 5,85 5,63 5,42 5,20 4,98 4,76 4,54 4,31 4,08 3,84

180 5,76 5,51 5,26 5,01 4,76 4,51 4,25 3,98 3,70 3,40 3,09

190 5,44 5,16 4,89 4,60 4,31 4,01 3,70 3,36 3,01 2,61 2,15

200 5,13 4,82 4,51 4,18 3,84 3,48 3,09 2,65 2,15 1,51 0

210 4,82 4,47 4,11 3,73 3,32 2,88 2,37 1,73 0,68 0 0

220 4,50 4,11 3,69 3,25 2,75 2,15 1,35 0 0 0 0

230 4,17 3,73 3,24 2,70 2,04 1,07 0 0 0 0 0

240 3,83 3,32 2,74 2,04 0,96 0 0 0 0 0 0

250 3,47 2,87 2,15 1,07 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

260 3,08 2,36 1,35 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

270 2,65 1,73 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

280 2,16 0,68 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

290 1,51 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

300 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
12.12.2014 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 356/91

Appendix J

Safety assurance over fixed obtuse crossings

(J.1) The fixed obtuse crossings should be designed in order not to have a too long unguided length. In obtuse crossing
check rails cannot be constructed to assure guidance over the whole length. This unguided length can be accepted
up to a certain limit, defined by a reference situation defining:

(a) Minimum crossing angle: tangent 1 in 9 (tgα = 0,11, α = 6°20′)

(b) Minimum radius through obtuse crossing: 450 m

(c) Minimum height of check rail: 45 mm

(d) Nose shape as defined in the figure below

Figure 6
Obtuse crossing
L 356/92 EN Official Journal of the European Union 12.12.2014

Figure 7

Point retraction X on check face

X = 3 mm (over a length of 150 mm).

Y = 8 mm (over a length of 200 to 500 mm approximately)

(J.2) If one or more of the above requirements is not respected, the design shall be checked, verifying either the equiva­
lence of the unguided length or acceptance of the interference between wheel and nose when they get in contact.

(J.3) The design shall be checked for wheels with diameter between 630 mm and 840 mm. For wheel diameters
between 330 mm and 630 mm specific demonstrations are required.

(J.4) The following graphs allow simple verification of unguided length for specific situation with different crossing
angles, height of check rail and different crossing curvature.

The graphs consider the following maximum track tolerances:

(a) Track gauge between 1 433 mm and 1 439 mm inclusive

(b) Nose protection between 1 393 mm and 1 398 mm inclusive

(c) Free wheel passage ≤ 1 356 mm

Figure 8 allows to specify the minimum wheel diameter that can run on curved obtuse crossings with a radius of
450 m, Figure 9 allows it for straight obtuse crossings.

For other situations specific calculations can be performed.

(J.5) For track gauge systems other than 1 435 mm, specific calculations shall be performed.
12.12.2014 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 356/93

Figure 8

Minimum wheel diameter against crossing angle for 450 m radius of obtuse crossing

1 Minimum wheel diameter [mm]

2 N for crossing angle tangent 1 in N

3 Height of check rail [mm] (Z3)

L 356/94 EN Official Journal of the European Union 12.12.2014

Figure 9

Minimum wheel diameter against crossing angle for straight obtuse crossing

1 Minimum wheel diameter [mm]

2 N for crossing angle tangent 1 in N

3 Height of check rail [mm] (Z3)

12.12.2014 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 356/95

Appendix K

Basis of minimum requirements for structures for passenger coaches and multiple units

The following mass definitions for passenger carriages and multiple units form the basis of the minimum requirements
for structures and checking the compatibility of structures with passenger coaches and multiple units.
The EN line categories in Appendix E are based upon the design mass under exceptional payload according to section 2.1
of EN 15663:2009+AC:2010 taking the values for passenger payload in standing areas given in Table 45 into account.
Where checks on the dynamic response of rail bridges are required to specify the load carrying capacity of the bridge,
the load capacity of the bridge should be specified and expressed in terms of the design mass under normal payload
according to section 2.1 of EN 15663:2009+AC:2010 taking the values for passenger payload in standing areas given in
Table 45 into account.
It is anticipated that the next revision of EN15528+A1:2012 will specify that these mass definitions shall be used when
checking the compatibility of infrastructure and rolling stock.

Table 45
Passenger payload in standing areas in kg/m2

Exceptional payload
Normal payload
to specify
Type of trains to specify
Line Category
Dynamic Compatibility
(Static Compatibility)

High speed and long distance trains

160 (1) 320
Table 3 in EN 15663:2009+AC:2010

High speed and long distance trains

Reservation Obligatory 0 320
Table 3 in EN 15663:2009+AC:2010

Others
(regional, commuter, suburban trains) 280 500 (2)
Table 4 in EN 15663:2009+AC:2010
Notes:
(1) Normal payload of Table 3 of EN 15663:2009+AC:2010 plus an additional 160 kg/m2 for standing areas
(2) For certain types of commuter services (e.g. RATP Paris) the passenger payload in standing areas is 700 kg/m2
L 356/96 EN Official Journal of the European Union 12.12.2014

Appendix L

Definition of EN line category a12 for traffic code P6

Traffic code P6 is defined by EN line category a12.

EN line category a12 is defined by a load model comprising of an unlimited number of the reference wagon a12 as
defined in Figure 11. The reference wagon a12 is defined by axle load, the geometrical characteristics of the spacing of
axles and the mass per unit length as defined in Figure 10.

Figure 10
Reference wagon of EN line category a12

Mass per unit

Reference Axle load P
length p Geometrical characteristics
wagon (t)
(t/m)

a12 12,0 2,4

Figure 11
Load model of EN line category a12

Line Arrangement of reference wagons

category n … unlimited number

a12

For the classification of infrastructure, EN line category a12 shall be used in accordance with chapter 5 of EN
15528:2008+A1:2012.
General information concerning the use of EN line category a12 for the categorisation of vehicles into EN line categories
is given in chapter 6.1 of EN 15528:2008+A1:2012 and shall be read in conjunction with Appendix K of this TSI.
It is anticipated that the next revision of EN 15528+A1:2012 will include line category a12.
12.12.2014 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 356/97

Appendix M

Specific case on the Estonian network

(1) Locomotive

(2) Distributed load: 140 kN/m

(3) Wagon

Appendix N

Specific cases of the Hellenic network

Deleted

Appendix O

Specific case on the Ireland and United Kingdom of Northern Ireland networks

Rules and drawings related to gauges IRL1, IRL2 and IRL3 are an open point.
L 356/98 EN Official Journal of the European Union 12.12.2014

Appendix P

Structure gauge for the lower parts for the 1 668 mm track gauge on the Spanish network

Structures gauges shall be obtained on the basis of the kinematic reference profiles and associated rules.

Calculations of structure gauge shall be done using the kinematic method in accordance with the requirements of chap­
ters 5, 7 and 10 of EN 15273-3:2013 with the kinematic reference profiles and associated rules defined in this
Appendix.

P.1. REFERENCE PROFILES

P.1.1. Kinematic reference profile GEI1

Figure 12 shows the reference profile for kinematic gauge GEI1 for vehicles which can pass over rail brakes in an
active position.

Figure 12
Reference profile of lower parts of kinematic gauge GEI1 for vehicles which can pass over rail brakes in
an active position (l = track gauge)
(Dimensions in millimeters)

(1) Running surface.

P.1.2. Kinematic reference profile GEI2

Figure 13 shows the reference profile for kinematic gauge GEI2 for vehicles which may pass over rail brakes in a
non-active position.

Figure 13
Reference profile of lower parts of kinematic gauge GEI2 for vehicles which may pass over rail brakes in
a non-active position (l = track gauge)
(Dimensions in millimeters)

(1) Running surface.

12.12.2014 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 356/99

P.2. ASSOCIATED RULES

Table 46 shows the additional overthrows for gauges GEI1 and GEI2.

Table 46
Rules for additional overthrows S for gauges GEI1 and GEI2

Additional overthrows for track gauge ‘l’ and height ‘h’ compared to the running surface

Radius h ≤ 0,4 m

250 ≤ R < ∞ 2,5 l − 1,668

Sicin ¼ Sacin ¼ þ
R 2
150 ≤ R < 250 50 l − 1,668
Sicin ¼ − 0,19 þ
R 2
60 l − 1,668
Sacin ¼ − 0,23 þ
R 2

P.3. VERTICAL LOWERING

The heights of the lower part must be reduced by the value 50/Rv (m), the radius being in metres.

The vertical curve radius Rv is limited to 500 m. Heights not exceeding 80 mm shall be considered as
zero within a radius Rv between 500 m and 625 m
L 356/100 EN Official Journal of the European Union 12.12.2014

Appendix Q

National technical rules for UK-GB Specific Cases

The National Technical Rules for UK-GB specific cases referred to in point 7.7.17 of this TSI are contained in the docu­
ments listed in Table 47. All documents are available on [Link].

Table 47
Notified national technical rules for UK-GB Specific Cases

Specific Case TSI Point Requirement NTR Ref NTR Title

Requirements for Defining and Maintaining

GC/RT5212
Clearances

4.2.1: Table 2 Categories of line: Requirements for the Application of Standard

[Link] GE/RT8073
& Table 3 Gauge Vehicle Gauges

Interface between Station Platforms, Track

GI/RT7016
and Trains

Requirements for Defining and Maintaining

GC/RT5212
Clearances

[Link] & [Link] & Requirements for the Application of Standard

Structure gauge GE/RT8073
[Link] [Link] Vehicle Gauges

Interface between Station Platforms, Track

GI/RT7016
and Trains

[Link] & [Link]: Table Distance between Requirements for Defining and Maintaining
GC/RT5212
[Link] 4 & [Link] track centres Clearances

Maximum unguided GC/RT5021 Track System Requirements

[Link] &
[Link] length of fixed
Annex J GM/RT2466 Railway Wheelsets
obtuse crossings

Interface between Station Platforms, Track

7.7. 17.6 [Link] Platform height GI/RT7016
and Trains

Interface between Station Platforms, Track

GI/RT7016
7.7. 17.7 & [Link] & and Trains
Platform offset
7.7. 17.10 [Link] Requirements for Defining and Maintaining
GC/RT5212
Clearances
12.12.2014 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 356/101

Appendix R

List of open points

(1) Requirements for the design of track, including switches and crossings, which are compatible with the use of eddy
current braking systems ([Link].2)
(2) Minimum factor alpha (a) for Traffic codes P1520 and F1520 ([Link].1)
(3) Immediate action limits for isolated defects in alignment for speeds of more than 300 km/h ([Link])
(4) Immediate action limits for isolated defects in longitudinal level for speeds of more than 300 km/h ([Link])
(5) The minimum allowed value of distance between track centres for the uniform structure gauge IRL3 is an open
point ([Link])
(6) EN Line Category –Associated Speed [km/h] for Traffic codes P1, P2, P3a, P4a, P1520, P1600, F1520 and F1600
(Appendix E, Tables 38 and 39)
(7) EN Line Category –Associated Speed [km/h] for Traffic codes P1, P2, P1600 and F1600 (Appendix F, Tables 40
and 41)
(8) Rules and drawings related to gauges IRL1, IRL2 and IRL3 are an open point (Appendix O)
(9) Requirements for mitigating the risk related to the ‘ballast pick up’ phenomenon (point [Link]) (open point also in
the LOC&PAS TSI)
L 356/102 EN Official Journal of the European Union 12.12.2014

Appendix S

Glossary

Table 48

Terms

Defined term TSI point Definition

Actual point (RP)/ [Link] Physical end of a crossing vee. See Figure 2, which shows the relation­
Praktischer Herzpunkt/ ship between the actual point (RP) and the intersection point (IP).
Pointe de coeur

Alert limit/ 4.5.2 Refers to the value which, if exceeded, requires that the track geometry
Auslösewert/ condition is analysed and considered in the regularly planned mainten­
Limite d'alerte ance operations.

Axle load/ 4.2.1, Sum of the static vertical wheel forces exerted on the track through a
Achsfahrmasse/ [Link] wheelset or a pair of independent wheels divided by acceleration of
Charge à l'essieu gravity.

Braking systems independent of [Link].2

wheel-rail adhesion conditions'

Cant/ [Link] Difference in height, relative to the horizontal, of the two rails of one
Überhöhung/ [Link] track at a particular location, measured at the centrelines of the heads
Dévers de la voie of the rails.

Cant deficiency/Überhöhungs­ [Link] Difference between the applied cant and a higher equilibrium cant.
fehlbetrag/Insuffisance de devers

Common crossing/ [Link] Arrangement ensuring intersection of two opposite running edges of
Starres Herzstück/ turnouts or diamond crossings and having one crossing vee and two
Coeur de croisement wing rails.

Crosswind/ [Link] Strong wind blowing laterally to a line which may adversely affect the
Seitenwind/ safety of trains running.
Vents traversiers

Design value/ [Link], Theoretical value without manufacturing, construction or maintenance

Planungswert/ [Link], tolerances.
Valeur de conception [Link],
[Link],
[Link]

Design track gauge/ 5.3.3 A single value which is obtained when all the components of the track
Konstruktionsspurweite/ conform precisely to their design dimensions or their median design
Ecartement de conception de la dimension when there is a range.
voie

Distance between track centres/ [Link] The distance between points of the centre lines of the two tracks
Gleisabstand/ under consideration, measured parallel to the running surface of the
Entraxe de voies reference track namely the less canted track.
12.12.2014 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 356/103

Defined term TSI point Definition

Dynamic lateral force/Dyna­ [Link] The sum of dynamic forces exerted by a wheelset on the track in
mische Querkraft/ lateral direction.
Effort dynamique transversal

Earthworks/ [Link], Soil structures and soil-retaining structures that are subject to railway
Erdbauwerke/ [Link] traffic loading.
Ouvrages en terre

EN Line Category/ [Link], The result of the classification process set out in EN 15528:2008
EN Streckenklasse/ Appendix E +A1:2012 Annex A and referred to in that standard as ‘Line Category’.
EN Catégorie de ligne It represents the ability of the infrastructure to withstand the vertical
loads imposed by vehicles on the line or section of line for regular
service.

Equivalent conicity/ [Link], The tangent of the cone angle of a wheelset with coned wheels whose
Äquivalente Konizität/ [Link] lateral movement has the same kinematic wavelength as the given
Conicité équivalente wheelset on straight track and large-radius curves.

Fixed nose protection/ [Link], Dimension between the crossing nose and check rail (see dimension
Leitweite/ Appendix J No 2 on Figure 14 below).
Cote de protection de pointe

Flangeway depth/ [Link]. Dimension between the running surface and the bottom of flangeway
Rillentiefe/ (see dimension No 6 on Figure 14 below).
Profondeur d'ornière

Flangeway width/ [Link]. Dimension between a running rail and an adjacent check or wing rail
Rillenweite/ (see dimension No 5 on Figure 14 below).
Largeur d'ornière

Free wheel passage at check rail/ [Link]. Dimension between the working face of the crossing check rail or
wing rail entry/ wing rail and the gauge face of the running rail opposite across the
Freier Raddurchlauf im gauge measured at entry to check rail or wing rail respectively.
Radlenker-Einlauf/ (see dimensions No 4 on Figure 14 below). The entry to the check rail
Flügelschienen-Einlauf/Côte or wing rail is the point at which the wheel is allowed to contact the
d'équilibrage du contre-rail check rail or wing rail.

Free wheel passage at crossing [Link]. Dimension between the working face of the crossing wing rail and
nose/ check rail opposite across the gauge (see dimension No 3 on Figure 14
Freier Raddurchlauf im Bereich below).
der Herzspitze/
Cote de libre passage dans le
croisement

Free wheel passage in switches/ [Link]. Dimension from the gauge face of one switch rail to the back edge of
Freier Raddurchlauf im Bereich the opposite switch rail (see dimension No 1 on Figure 14 below).
der Zungen-vorrichtung/Côte de
libre passage de l'aiguillage
L 356/104 EN Official Journal of the European Union 12.12.2014

Defined term TSI point Definition

Gauge/ 4.2.1, Set of rules including a reference contour and its associated calculation
Begrenzungslinie/ [Link] rules allowing definition of the outer dimensions of the vehicle and
Gabarit the space to be cleared by the infrastructure.

HBW/HBW/HBW [Link] The non SI unit for steel hardness defined in EN ISO 6506-1:2005
Metallic materials — Brinell hardness test. Test method.

Height of check rail/ [Link], Height of the check rail above the running surface (see dimension 7
Radlenkerüberhöhung/ Appendix J on Figure 14 below).
Surélévation du contre rail

Immediate Action Limit/Sofort­ 4.2.8, 4.5 The value which, if exceeded, requires taking measures to reduce the
eingriffsschwelle/ risk of derailment to an acceptable level.
Limite d'intervention immédiate

Infrastructure Manager/ [Link], As defined in Article 2h) of Directive 2001/14/EC of 26 February

Betreiber der Infrastruktur/ [Link], 2001 on the allocation of railway infrastructure capacity and the
Gestionnaire de l'Infrastructure [Link], levying of charges for the use of railway infrastructure and safety certi­
[Link] fication (OJ L 75, 15.3.2001, p. 29).
4.4, 4.5.2,
4.6, 4.7,
[Link],
6.2.4, 6.4

In service value/ [Link], Value measured at any time after the infrastructure has been placed
Wert im Betriebszustand/ [Link] into service.
Valeur en exploitation

Intersection point (IP)/ [Link] Theoretical intersection point of the running edges at the centre of the
Theoretischer Herzpunkt/ crossing (see Figure 2).
Point d'intersection théorique

Intervention Limit/Eingriffs­ 4.5.2 The value, which, if exceeded, requires corrective maintenance in order
schwelle/ that the immediate action limit shall not be reached before the next
Valeur d'intervention inspection;

Isolated defect/ 4.2.8 A discrete track geometry fault.

Einzelfehler/
Défaut isolé

Line speed/ 4.2.1 Maximum speed for which a line has been designed.
Streckengeschwindigkeit/
Vitesse de la ligne

Maintenance file/ 4.5.1 Elements of the technical file relating to conditions and limits of use
Instandhaltungsdossier/ and instructions for maintenance.
Dossier de maintenance

Maintenance plan/ 4.5.2 A series of documents setting out the infrastructure maintenance pro­
Instandhaltungsplan/ cedures adopted by an Infrastructure Manager.
Plan de maintenance
12.12.2014 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 356/105

Defined term TSI point Definition

Multi-rail track/ [Link] Track with more than two rails, where at least two pairs of respective
Mehrschienengleis/ rails are designed to be operated as separate single tracks, with or
Voie à multi écartement without different track gauges.

Nominal track gauge/ [Link] A single value which identifies the track gauge but may differ from the
Nennspurweite/ design track gauge.
Ecartement nominal de la voie

Normal service/ [Link] The railway operating to a planned timetable service.

Regelbetrieb/ 4.2.9
Service régulier

Passive provision/ 4.2.9 Provision for the future construction of a physical extension to a struc­
Vorsorge für künftige Erwei­ ture (for example: increased platform length).
terungen/Réservation pour
extension future

Performance Parameter/ 4.2.1 Parameter describing a TSI Category of Line used as the basis for the
Leistungskennwert/ design of infrastructure subsystem elements and as the indication of
Paramètre de performance the performance level of a line.

Plain line/ [Link] Section of track without switches and crossings.

Freie Strecke/ [Link]
Voie courante [Link]

Point retraction/ [Link] The reference line in a fixed common crossing can deviate from the
Spitzenbeihobelung/ theoretical reference line. From a certain distance to the crossing point,
Dénivelation de la pointe de the reference line of the vee can, depending on the design, be retracted
cœur from this theoretical line away from the wheel flange in order to avoid
contact between both elements. This situation is described in Figure 2.

Rail inclination/ [Link] An angle defining the inclination of the head of a rail when installed
Schienenneigung/ [Link] in the track relative to the plane of the rails (running surface), equal to
Inclinaison du rail the angle between the axis of symmetry of the rail (or of an equivalent
symmetrical rail having the same rail head profile) and the perpendi­
cular to the plane of the rails.

Rail pad/ 5.3.2 A resilient layer fitted between a rail and the supporting sleeper or
Schienenzwischenlage/ baseplate.
Semelle sous rail

Reverse curve/ [Link] Two abutting curves of opposite flexure or hand

Gegenbogen/
Courbes et contre-courbes

Structure gauge/ [Link] Defines the space in relation to the reference track that shall be cleared
Lichtraum/ of all objects or structures and of the traffic on the adjacent tracks, in
Gabarit des obstacles order to allow safe operation on the reference track. It is defined on
the basis of the reference contour by application of the associated
rules.

Swing nose [Link]

L 356/106 EN Official Journal of the European Union 12.12.2014

Defined term TSI point Definition

Switch/ [Link] A unit of track comprising two fixed rails (stock rails) and two
Zungenvorrichtung/ movable rails (switch rails) used to direct vehicles from one track to
aiguillage another track.

Switches and crossings/ [Link], Track constructed from sets of switches and individual crossings and
Weichen und Kreuzungen/ [Link], the rails connecting them.
Appareil de voie 4.2.5, 4.2.6,
[Link], 5.2,
[Link],
[Link],
[Link],
7.3.3,
Appendix C
and D,

Through route/ Appendix D In the context of switches and crossings a route which perpetuate the
Stammgleis/ general alignment of the track.
Voie directe

Track design 4.2.6, 6.2.5, The track design consists of cross-section defining basic dimensions
Appendix C and track components (for example rail, rail fastenings, sleepers,
and D ballast) used together with operating conditions with an impact on
forces related to 4.2.6., such as axle load, speed and radius of hori­
zontal curvature.

Track gauge/ [Link], The smallest distance between lines perpendicular to the running
Spurweite/ [Link], surface intersecting each rail head profile in a range from 0 to 14 mm
Ecartement de la voie [Link], below the running surface.
5.3.3,
[Link],
[Link],
Appendix H

Track twist/ [Link].6 Track twist is defined as the algebraic difference between two cross
Gleisverwindung/ [Link], levels taken at a defined distance apart, usually expressed as a gradient
Gauche [Link], between the two points at which the cross level is measured.

Train length/ 4.2.1 The length of a train, which can run on a certain line in normal opera­
Zuglänge/ tion.
Longueur du train

Unguided length of an obtuse [Link], Portion of obtuse crossing where there is no guidance of the wheel
crossing/ Appendix J described as ‘unguided distance’ in EN 13232-3:2003.
Führungslose Stelle/
Lacune dans la traversée

Usable length of a platform/ 4.2.1, The maximum continuous length of that part of platform in front of
Bahnsteignutzlänge/ [Link] which a train is intended to remain stationary in normal operating
Longueur utile de quai conditions for passengers to board and alight from the train, making
appropriate allowance for stopping tolerances.
Normal operating conditions means that railway is operating in a non-
degraded mode (e.g. rail adhesion is normal, signals are working,
everything is working as planned).
12.12.2014 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 356/107

Figure 14

Geometry of switches and crossings

(1) 1 Free wheel passage in switches

(2) Fixed nose protection

(3) Free wheel passage at crossing nose

(4) Free wheel passage at check rail/wing rail entry

(5) Flangeway width

(6) Flangeway depth

(7) Height of check rail

L 356/108 EN Official Journal of the European Union 12.12.2014

Appendix T

List of referenced standards

Table 49

List of referenced standards

Index Version
Reference Document name BP(s) concerned
No. (year)

1 EN 13674-1 Railway applications — Track — Rail 2011 Railhead profile for plain line ([Link]),
Part 1: Vignole railway rails 46 kg/m Assessment of rails ([Link])
and above

2 EN 13674-4 Railway applications — Track — Rail 2006 Railhead profile for plain line ([Link])
— Part 4: Vignole railway rails from
27 kg/m to, but excluding 46 kg/m
(with Amendment A1:2009)

3 EN 13715 Railway applications — Wheelsets and 2006 Equivalent conicity ([Link])

boogies — Wheels — Wheels tread A1:2010
(with Amendment A1:2010)

4 EN 13848-1 Track geometry quality — Part 1: Char­ 2003 The immediate action limit for track
acterisation of track geometry (with twist ([Link]), Assessment of minimum
Amendment A1:2008) value of mean track gauge ([Link])

5 EN 13848-5 Railway applications — Track — Track 2008 The immediate action limit for align­
geometry quality — Part 5: Geometric ment ([Link]), The immediate action
quality levels — Plain line (with limit for longitudinal level ([Link]), The
Amendment A1:2010) immediate action limit for track twist
([Link])

6 EN 14067-5 Railway applications — Aerodynamics 2006 Assessment of maximum pressure varia­

— Part 5: Requirements and test pro­ tions in tunnels ([Link])
cedures for aerodynamics in tunnels
(with Amendment A1:2010)

7 EN 15273-3 Railway applications — Gauges — Part 2013 Structure gauge ([Link]), Distance
3: Structure gauges between track centres ([Link]), Platform
offset ([Link]), Assessment of structure
gauge ([Link]), Assessment of distance
between track centres ([Link]), Assess­
ment of platform offset ([Link])

8 EN 15302 Railway applications — Method for 2008 Equivalent conicity ([Link]), Assessment
specifying the equivalent conicity (with of design values for equivalent conicity
Amendment A1:2010) ([Link])

9 EN 15528 Railway applications — Line categories 2008 Ascertain compatibility of infrastructure

for managing the interface between and rolling stock after authorisation of
load limits of vehicles and infrastruc­ rolling stock (7.6), Capability require­
ture (with Amendment A1:2012) ments for structures according to traffic
code (Appendix E), Basis of minimum
requirements for structures for passenger
coaches and multiple units (Appendix
K), Definition of line category a12 for
traffic code p6 (Appendix L)
12.12.2014 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 356/109

Index Version
Reference Document name BP(s) concerned
No. (year)

10 EN 15663 Railway applications — Definition of 2009 TSI categories of line (4.2.1), Basis of
vehicle reference masses (with Correc­ minimum requirements for structures
tions AC:2010) for passenger coaches and multiple units
(Appendix K)

11 EN 1990 Eurocode — Basis of structural design 2002 Structures resistance to traffic loads
(with Amendment A1:2005 and (4.2.7), Resistance of new bridges to
Correction AC:2010) traffic loads ([Link])

12 EN 1991-2 Eurocode 1 — Actions on structures 2003 Structures resistance to traffic loads

— Part 2: Traffic load on bridges (with (4.2.7), Resistance of new bridges to
Correction AC:2010) traffic loads ([Link]), Equivalent vertical
loading for new earthworks and earth
pressure effects ([Link]), Resistance of
new structures over or adjacent to tracks
([Link])

13 EN Railway applications — Testing for the 2005 Track resistance to vertical load
14363:2005 acceptance of running characteristics of ([Link]), Lateral track resistance
railway vehicles — Testing of running ([Link]),
behaviour and stationary tests