[#67346] Future of test suites for Ruby — Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...>
I'll try to be brief so we can discuss all this. tl;dr: RubySpec is
19 messages
2015/01/05
[#67353] Re: Future of test suites for Ruby
— Tanaka Akira <akr@...>
2015/01/05
2015-01-06 7:18 GMT+09:00 Charles Oliver Nutter <[email protected]>:
[#67444] [ruby-trunk - Feature #10718] [Open] IO#close should not raise IOError on closed IO objects. — akr@...
Issue #10718 has been reported by Akira Tanaka.
3 messages
2015/01/09
[#67689] Keyword Arguments — Anthony Crumley <anthony.crumley@...>
Please forgive my ignorance as I am new to MRI development and am still
5 messages
2015/01/20
[#67733] [ruby-trunk - Bug #10761] Marshal.dump 100% slower in 2.2.0 vs 2.1.5 — normalperson@...
Issue #10761 has been updated by Eric Wong.
4 messages
2015/01/21
[#67736] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #10761] Marshal.dump 100% slower in 2.2.0 vs 2.1.5
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2015/01/22
[email protected] wrote:
[#67772] Preventing Redundant Email Messages — Jeremy Evans <code@...>
For a long time, I've wondered why I sometimes receive redundant email
5 messages
2015/01/23
[ruby-core:67317] [ruby-trunk - misc #10307] [Closed] Add doc for Array.reject, it maintains ordering
From:
ayumu.aizawa@...
Date:
2015-01-04 03:46:05 UTC
List:
ruby-core #67317
Issue #10307 has been updated by Ayumu AIZAWA. Status changed from Open to Closed ---------------------------------------- misc #10307: Add doc for Array.reject, it maintains ordering https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/10307#change-50776 * Author: Nebu Pookins * Status: Closed * Priority: Normal * Assignee: Zachary Scott * Category: doc * Target version: ---------------------------------------- Hi, I'm trying to follow the instructions in http://documenting-ruby.org/step-by-step-guide.html for submitting documentation. I sent a pull request to https://github.com/documenting-ruby/ruby/pull/42 for quality review, but didn't get any replies. It seems like the next step is to submit a patch here. The intent of the change is to document that array.reject maintains the ordering of the elements it keeps as part of its contract. ---Files-------------------------------- 55ef50dd551008d513e2adbb39db67dd7b9ffe86.patch (701 Bytes) -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/