[#67346] Future of test suites for Ruby — Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...>
I'll try to be brief so we can discuss all this. tl;dr: RubySpec is
19 messages
2015/01/05
[#67353] Re: Future of test suites for Ruby
— Tanaka Akira <akr@...>
2015/01/05
2015-01-06 7:18 GMT+09:00 Charles Oliver Nutter <[email protected]>:
[#67444] [ruby-trunk - Feature #10718] [Open] IO#close should not raise IOError on closed IO objects. — akr@...
Issue #10718 has been reported by Akira Tanaka.
3 messages
2015/01/09
[#67689] Keyword Arguments — Anthony Crumley <anthony.crumley@...>
Please forgive my ignorance as I am new to MRI development and am still
5 messages
2015/01/20
[#67733] [ruby-trunk - Bug #10761] Marshal.dump 100% slower in 2.2.0 vs 2.1.5 — normalperson@...
Issue #10761 has been updated by Eric Wong.
4 messages
2015/01/21
[#67736] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #10761] Marshal.dump 100% slower in 2.2.0 vs 2.1.5
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2015/01/22
[email protected] wrote:
[#67772] Preventing Redundant Email Messages — Jeremy Evans <code@...>
For a long time, I've wondered why I sometimes receive redundant email
5 messages
2015/01/23
[ruby-core:67319] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9989] Docs give wrong information for sort block return values
From:
ayumu.aizawa@...
Date:
2015-01-04 05:53:50 UTC
List:
ruby-core #67319
Issue #9989 has been updated by Ayumu AIZAWA.
Related to Bug #10125: Array#sort and #sort! documentation issue added
----------------------------------------
Bug #9989: Docs give wrong information for sort block return values
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/9989#change-50779
* Author: Rob Yoder
* Status: Open
* Priority: Normal
* Assignee: Zachary Scott
* Category: doc
* Target version: current: 2.2.0
* ruby -v: 2.1.2
* Backport: 2.0.0: UNKNOWN, 2.1: UNKNOWN
----------------------------------------
Under the Array.sort documentation, this statement is made:
> Comparisons for the sort will be done using the <=> operator or using an optional code block.
>
> The block must implement a comparison between a and b, and return -1, when a follows b, 0 when a and b are equivalent, or +1 if b follows a.
This is incorrect. The default sort block is `{ |a,b| a <=> b }`. That is ascending sort, where `2` would follow `1`. However, `1 <=> 2` returns `-1`, not `+1` as the statement claims. The statement should read:
> The block must implement a comparison between a and b, and return -1 when b follows a, 0 when a and b are equivalent, or +1 if a follows b.
--
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/