[#89430] [Ruby trunk Misc#15229] DevelopersMeeting201801122Japan — mame@...
Issue #15229 has been reported by mame (Yusuke Endoh).
3 messages
2018/10/17
[#89555] [Ruby trunk Feature#15251] Hash aset should deduplicate non tainted string — chopraanmol1@...
Issue #15251 has been updated by chopraanmol1 (Anmol Chopra).
3 messages
2018/10/25
[#89583] [PATCH] vm_trace.c (postponed_job_register): only hit main thread — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
@hsbt: I post here on ruby-core because I hit errors with
5 messages
2018/10/27
[#89584] Re: [PATCH] vm_trace.c (postponed_job_register): only hit main thread
— Koichi Sasada <ko1@...>
2018/10/27
thank you for you patch.
[#89590] Re: [PATCH] vm_trace.c (postponed_job_register): only hit main thread
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2018/10/28
Koichi Sasada <[email protected]> wrote:
[#89621] [Ruby trunk Bug#14867] Process.wait can wait for MJIT compiler process — Greg.mpls@...
Issue #14867 has been updated by MSP-Greg (Greg L).
4 messages
2018/10/29
[#89622] Re: [Ruby trunk Bug#14867] Process.wait can wait for MJIT compiler process
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2018/10/29
[email protected] wrote:
[#89627] [Ruby trunk Bug#14867] Process.wait can wait for MJIT compiler process — takashikkbn@...
Issue #14867 has been updated by k0kubun (Takashi Kokubun).
3 messages
2018/10/30
[#89654] [Ruby trunk Bug#14867] Process.wait can wait for MJIT compiler process — takashikkbn@...
Issue #14867 has been updated by k0kubun (Takashi Kokubun).
4 messages
2018/10/31
[#89655] Re: [Ruby trunk Bug#14867] Process.wait can wait for MJIT compiler process
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2018/10/31
[email protected] wrote:
[ruby-core:89512] Re: [Ruby trunk Bug#15241] net/pop fix to use mutable strings was too eager
From:
Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
Date:
2018-10-22 18:31:31 UTC
List:
ruby-core #89512
``` [email protected] wrote: > https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/15241 > See > [[https://github.com/ruby/ruby/commit/3993fbb5f6bfdae0bce040988d7e2dd632247cdc#commitcomment-30987842|this > thread on Github]]. I believe the changes made in Backport > #14416 for 2.5.2 (on both trunk and 2.5.x) over-eagerly > applied mutability to literal strings. In particular, the > strings returned by `inspect` have no real need to be mutable > as far as I can tell. We cannot make assumptions about how people use strings returned from .inspect. Such code exists and we should not break it: warn(foo.inspect << " #{__FILE__}:#{__LINE__}") Disclaimer: I do not speak for the rest of ruby-core. This worked in 2.2 and earlier, and we should be maintaining compatibility with such code. If we have .inspect method returning frozen strings, I consider it a bug. I hate that we allocate extra objects and lose performance; but losing compatibility and breaking existing code is worse. ``` Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe> <http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>