[#99856] [Ruby master Feature#17143] Improve support for warning categories — merch-redmine@...

Issue #17143 has been reported by jeremyevans0 (Jeremy Evans).

16 messages 2020/09/03

[#99868] [Ruby master Bug#17144] Tempfile.open { ... } does not unlink the file — eregontp@...

Issue #17144 has been reported by Eregon (Benoit Daloze).

15 messages 2020/09/03

[#99885] [Ruby master Feature#17145] Ractor-aware `Object#deep_freeze` — marcandre-ruby-core@...

Issue #17145 has been reported by marcandre (Marc-Andre Lafortune).

32 messages 2020/09/03

[#99903] [Ruby master Bug#17146] Queue operations are allowed after it is frozen — eregontp@...

Issue #17146 has been reported by Eregon (Benoit Daloze).

16 messages 2020/09/03

[#100016] [Ruby master Feature#17171] Why is the visibility of constants not affected by `private`? — marcandre-ruby-core@...

Issue #17171 has been reported by marcandre (Marc-Andre Lafortune).

10 messages 2020/09/15

[#100024] [Ruby master Bug#17175] Ruby 2.5: OpenSSL related test failures — jaruga@...

Issue #17175 has been reported by jaruga (Jun Aruga).

10 messages 2020/09/16

[#100025] [Ruby master Feature#17176] GC.enable_autocompact / GC.disable_autocompact — tenderlove@...

Issue #17176 has been reported by tenderlovemaking (Aaron Patterson).

11 messages 2020/09/16

[#100099] [Ruby master Bug#17184] No stdlib function to perform simple string replacement — sheerun@...

Issue #17184 has been reported by sheerun (Adam Stankiewicz).

18 messages 2020/09/24

[#100192] [Ruby master Bug#17197] Some Hash methods still have arity 2 instead of 1 — marcandre-ruby-core@...

Issue #17197 has been reported by marcandre (Marc-Andre Lafortune).

14 messages 2020/09/28

[#100200] [Ruby master Misc#17199] id outputed by inspect and to_s output does not allow to find actual object_id and vice-versa — baptiste.courtois@...

Issue #17199 has been reported by Annih (Baptiste Courtois).

7 messages 2020/09/28

[#100206] [Ruby master Misc#17200] DevelopersMeeting20201026Japan — mame@...

Issue #17200 has been reported by mame (Yusuke Endoh).

18 messages 2020/09/28

[#100239] [Ruby master Feature#17206] Introduce new Regexp option to avoid MatchData allocation — fatkodima123@...

Issue #17206 has been reported by fatkodima (Dima Fatko).

8 messages 2020/09/30

[ruby-core:99996] [Ruby master Bug#17167] Nested numbered parameters are not allowed

From: sawadatsuyoshi@...
Date: 2020-09-12 15:20:29 UTC
List: ruby-core #99996
Issue #17167 has been reported by sawa (Tsuyoshi Sawada).

----------------------------------------
Bug #17167: Nested numbered parameters are not allowed
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/17167

* Author: sawa (Tsuyoshi Sawada)
* Status: Open
* Priority: Normal
* Backport: 2.5: UNKNOWN, 2.6: UNKNOWN, 2.7: UNKNOWN
----------------------------------------
Numbered parameter is allowed in an ordinary block:

```ruby
[[1, 2], [3, 4]].each{p _1}
# >> [1, 2]
# >> [3, 4]
```

as well as in a nested block:

```ruby
[[1, 2], [3, 4]].each{|a| a.each{p _1}}
# >> 1
# >> 2
# >> 3
# >> 4
```

but not in both at the same time:

```ruby
[[1, 2], [3, 4]].each{_1.each{p _1}}
# >> SyntaxError ((irb):2: numbered parameter is already used in) outer block here
# >> [[1, 2], [3, 4]].each{_1.each{p _1}}
                      ^~
```

I feel that this should be a bug. 


Note that an error is not raised when an ordinary block parameter with the same name is used in the outer and the inner blocks:

```ruby
[[1, 2], [3, 4]].each{|v| v.each{|v| p v}}
# >> 1
# >> 2
# >> 3
# >> 4
```

If this is not a bug, the specification of numbered parameters is too complex. How am I supposed to use numbered parameters in such use case as above?



-- 
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
<http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>

In This Thread

Prev Next