ruby-core

Mailing Lists

ruby-list (For Ruby users, JA) ruby-dev (For Ruby developers, JA) ruby-core (For Ruby developers, EN) ruby-talk (For Ruby users, EN)
2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

[#35599] Proc#== behaviour on 1.8.7 and 1.9.2 — Adam Prescott <adam@...>

I've encountered a problem when using Proc#== (with both lambdas and

5 messages 2011/04/01
[#36923] Re: Proc#== behaviour on 1.8.7 and 1.9.2 — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...> 2011/06/10

Hi,
[#37083] Re: Proc#== behaviour on 1.8.7 and 1.9.2 — Adam Prescott <adam@...> 2011/06/13

On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 2:24 PM, SASADA Koichi <[email protected]> wrote:
[#37084] Re: Proc#== behaviour on 1.8.7 and 1.9.2 — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...> 2011/06/13

(2011/06/13 21:32), Adam Prescott wrote:
[#37087] Re: Proc#== behaviour on 1.8.7 and 1.9.2 — Adam Prescott <adam@...> 2011/06/13

On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 1:41 PM, SASADA Koichi <[email protected]> wrote:

[#35605] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4550][Open] Loading an RSA public key during an HTTPS connection corrupts the connection — Eric Hodel <[email protected]>

1 message 2011/04/03

[#35606] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4551][Open] uri.set_scheme should downcase schemes — Eric Hodel <[email protected]>

4 messages 2011/04/03
[#35624] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4551] uri.set_scheme should downcase schemes — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2011/04/06

[#43444] [ruby-trunk - Feature #4551][Assigned] uri.set_scheme should downcase schemes — naruse <naruse@...> 2012/03/18

[#43471] [ruby-trunk - Feature #4551] uri.set_scheme should downcase schemes — "naruse (Yui NARUSE)" <naruse@...> 2012/03/19

[#35612] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4554][Open] test_set_errors in test_x509store.rb fails on CentOS 5.5 — Yutaka HARA <redmine@...>

3 messages 2011/04/05
[#37048] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4554] test_set_errors in test_x509store.rb fails on CentOS 5.5 — Yutaka HARA <redmine@...> 2011/06/12

[#37057] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4554][Closed] test_set_errors in test_x509store.rb fails on CentOS 5.5 — Motohiro KOSAKI <kosaki.motohiro@...> 2011/06/12

[#35613] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4539][Assigned] Array#zip_with — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...>

11 messages 2011/04/05
[#35617] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4539][Assigned] Array#zip_with — Benoit Daloze <eregontp@...> 2011/04/05

> http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/4539
[#35673] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4539][Assigned] Array#zip_with — Kenta Murata <muraken@...> 2011/04/09

Hi,
[#35675] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4539][Assigned] Array#zip_with — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2011/04/09

Hi,
[#35677] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4539][Assigned] Array#zip_with — Benoit Daloze <eregontp@...> 2011/04/09

Hello,
[#35680] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4539][Assigned] Array#zip_with — Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core-mailing-list@...> 2011/04/10

Hi,
[#35689] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4539][Assigned] Array#zip_with — Kenta Murata <muraken@...> 2011/04/10

Hi,
[#35681] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4539][Assigned] Array#zip_with — "Shota Fukumori (sora_h)" <sorah@...> 2011/04/10

HI,
[#35682] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4539][Assigned] Array#zip_with — Yusuke ENDOH <mame@...> 2011/04/10

Hi,
[#35685] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4539][Assigned] Array#zip_with — Adam Prescott <adam@...> 2011/04/10

On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 2:13 PM, Yukihiro Matsumoto <[email protected]> wro=
[#35676] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4539][Assigned] Array#zip_with — Benoit Daloze <eregontp@...> 2011/04/09

Hi,

[#35614] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4530][Rejected] trunk "make check" gives "cannot load such file -- zlib" and "cannot load such file -- openssl" — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...>

1 message 2011/04/05

[#35615] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4541][Assigned] Inconsistent Array.slice() — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...>

1 message 2011/04/05

[#35616] [Ruby 1.8 - Feature #4239] Let's begin a talk for "1.8.8" -- How's needed for surviving 1.8? — Shyouhei Urabe <shyouhei@...>

2 messages 2011/04/05
[#35687] Re: [Ruby 1.8 - Feature #4239] Let's begin a talk for "1.8.8" -- How's needed for surviving 1.8? — Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...> 2011/04/10

Good news, Shyouhei! This will help encourage us to move JRuby to 1.9

[#35618] Redmine issues — Benoit Daloze <eregontp@...>

Hello,

6 messages 2011/04/05
[#35787] Re: Redmine issues — Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core-mailing-list@...> 2011/04/16

Hi.
[#35789] Re: Redmine issues — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2011/04/16

[#35838] Re: Redmine issues — "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...> 2011/04/20

(2011/04/17 2:43), Marc-Andre Lafortune wrote:
[#35839] Re: Redmine issues — Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core-mailing-list@...> 2011/04/20

On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 12:34 PM, NARUSE, Yui <[email protected]> wrote:
[#35840] Re: Redmine issues — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2011/04/21

[#35619] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4289] Timeouts in threads cause SEGV — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>

2 messages 2011/04/05
[#35622] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4289] Timeouts in threads cause SEGV — Eric Wong <normalperson@...> 2011/04/05

Motohiro KOSAKI wrote:

[#35620] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4266] Timeouts in threads cause "ThreadError: deadlock; recursive locking" — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>

1 message 2011/04/05

[#35621] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4555][Open] [PATCH] ext/socket/init.c: rsock_connect retries on interrupt — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>

7 messages 2011/04/05
[#35653] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4555][Assigned] [PATCH] ext/socket/init.c: rsock_connect retries on interrupt — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2011/04/08

[#35706] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4555] [PATCH] ext/socket/init.c: rsock_connect retries on interrupt — redmine@... 2011/04/11

[#35708] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4555] [PATCH] ext/socket/init.c: rsock_connect retries on interrupt — redmine@... 2011/04/11

[#35964] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4555] [PATCH] ext/socket/init.c: rsock_connect retries on interrupt — KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...> 2011/05/01

> Your patch looks reasonable to me, but maybe some platforms break under it...
[#35965] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4555] [PATCH] ext/socket/init.c: rsock_connect retries on interrupt — Eric Wong <normalperson@...> 2011/05/01

KOSAKI Motohiro <[email protected]> wrote:
[#35966] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4555][Closed] [PATCH] ext/socket/init.c: rsock_connect retries on interrupt — Motohiro KOSAKI <kosaki.motohiro@...> 2011/05/01

[#35623] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4289] Timeouts in threads cause SEGV — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>

1 message 2011/04/06

[#35625] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4549][Rejected] Can't start class names with non us-ascii chars — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...>

2 messages 2011/04/06
[#35627] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4549][Rejected] Can't start class names with non us-ascii chars — Nikolai Weibull <now@...> 2011/04/06

On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 09:48, Yui NARUSE <[email protected]> wrote:

[#35626] [Ruby - Feature #2350] Unicode specific functionality on String in 1.9 — Carl Hörberg <carl.hoerberg@...>

1 message 2011/04/06

[#35628] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4549] Can't start class names with non us-ascii chars — Carl Hörberg <carl.hoerberg@...>

1 message 2011/04/06

[#35629] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4473] Calling return within begin still executes else — Mayank Kohaley <redmine@...>

4 messages 2011/04/06
[#36926] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4473] Calling return within begin still executes else — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...> 2011/06/10

Hi,
[#36932] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4473] Calling return within begin still executes else — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2011/06/10

Hi,
[#36934] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4473] Calling return within begin still executes else — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...> 2011/06/10

(2011/06/10 22:56), Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#35630] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4557][Open] Invalid case behaviour when comparing a character read from a file — Steve Robb <redmine@...>

4 messages 2011/04/06
[#35646] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4557] Invalid case behaviour when comparing a character read from a file — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...> 2011/04/07

[#35654] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4557][Assigned] Invalid case behaviour when comparing a character read from a file — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2011/04/08

[#35937] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4557] Invalid case behaviour when comparing a character read from a file — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2011/04/28

[#35631] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4558][Open] TestSocket#test_closed_read fails after r31230 — Tomoyuki Chikanaga <redmine@...>

23 messages 2011/04/06
[#35641] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4558][Open] TestSocket#test_closed_read fails after r31230 — KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...> 2011/04/07

> ----------------------------------------
[#35647] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4558][Open] TestSocket#test_closed_read fails after r31230 — Eric Wong <normalperson@...> 2011/04/07

KOSAKI Motohiro <[email protected]> wrote:
[#35662] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4558][Open] TestSocket#test_closed_read fails after r31230 — KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...> 2011/04/08

2011/4/8 Eric Wong <[email protected]>:
[#35670] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4558][Open] TestSocket#test_closed_read fails after r31230 — Eric Wong <normalperson@...> 2011/04/09

KOSAKI Motohiro <[email protected]> wrote:
[#35665] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4558] TestSocket#test_closed_read fails after r31230 — Tomoyuki Chikanaga <redmine@...> 2011/04/09

[#35669] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4558] TestSocket#test_closed_read fails after r31230 — Eric Wong <normalperson@...> 2011/04/09

Tomoyuki Chikanaga <[email protected]> wrote:
[#35671] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4558] TestSocket#test_closed_read fails after r31230 — Eric Wong <normalperson@...> 2011/04/09

Eric Wong <[email protected]> wrote:
[#35702] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4558] TestSocket#test_closed_read fails after r31230 — KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...> 2011/04/11

> Subject: [PATCH] io.c (rb_io_close): ensure IOError for cross-thread clos=
[#35709] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4558] TestSocket#test_closed_read fails after r31230 — Eric Wong <normalperson@...> 2011/04/11

KOSAKI Motohiro <[email protected]> wrote:
[#35674] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4558] TestSocket#test_closed_read fails after r31230 — Tomoyuki Chikanaga <redmine@...> 2011/04/09

[#35684] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4558] TestSocket#test_closed_read fails after r31230 — Eric Wong <normalperson@...> 2011/04/10

Tomoyuki Chikanaga <[email protected]> wrote:
[#35703] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4558][Closed] TestSocket#test_closed_read fails after r31230 — redmine@... 2011/04/11

[#35715] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4558][Assigned] TestSocket#test_closed_read fails after r31230 — redmine@... 2011/04/12

[#35725] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4558][Assigned] TestSocket#test_closed_read fails after r31230 — KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...> 2011/04/12

2011/4/12 <[email protected]>:
[#35732] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4558][Assigned] TestSocket#test_closed_read fails after r31230 — "U.Nakamura" <usa@...> 2011/04/13

Hello,
[#35735] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4558][Assigned] TestSocket#test_closed_read fails after r31230 — KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...> 2011/04/13

Hi
[#35716] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4558] TestSocket#test_closed_read fails after r31230 — redmine@... 2011/04/12

[#35726] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4558] TestSocket#test_closed_read fails after r31230 — KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...> 2011/04/12

> Issue #4558 has been updated by Eric Wong.
[#35746] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4558] TestSocket#test_closed_read fails after r31230 — Eric Wong <normalperson@...> 2011/04/13

KOSAKI Motohiro <[email protected]> wrote:
[#35752] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4558] TestSocket#test_closed_read fails after r31230 — KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...> 2011/04/14

Hi
[#35755] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4558] TestSocket#test_closed_read fails after r31230 — Eric Wong <normalperson@...> 2011/04/14

KOSAKI Motohiro <[email protected]> wrote:
[#36999] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4558][Closed] TestSocket#test_closed_read fails after r31230 — Motohiro KOSAKI <kosaki.motohiro@...> 2011/06/11

[#35632] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4559][Open] Proc#== does not match the documented behaviour — Adam Prescott <redmine@...>

13 messages 2011/04/06
[#50156] [ruby-trunk - Bug #4559] Proc#== does not match the documented behaviour — "ko1 (Koichi Sasada)" <redmine@...> 2012/11/26

[#50251] [ruby-trunk - Bug #4559] Proc#== does not match the documented behaviour — "matz (Yukihiro Matsumoto)" <matz@...> 2012/11/28

[#50252] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #4559] Proc#== does not match the documented behaviour — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...> 2012/11/28

(2012/11/28 16:10), matz (Yukihiro Matsumoto) wrote:
[#50505] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #4559] Proc#== does not match the documented behaviour — Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...> 2012/12/03

I believe this will be a spec change, albeit a small one. Can we
[#50509] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #4559] Proc#== does not match the documented behaviour — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...> 2012/12/03

(2012/12/03 15:26), Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
[#50513] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #4559] Proc#== does not match the documented behaviour — Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...> 2012/12/03

On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 1:15 AM, SASADA Koichi <[email protected]> wrote:
[#37017] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4559][Assigned] Proc#== does not match the documented behaviour — Koichi Sasada <redmine@...> 2011/06/11

[#37096] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4559] Proc#== does not match the documented behaviour — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2011/06/13

[#37091] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4559] Proc#== does not match the documented behaviour — Koichi Sasada <redmine@...> 2011/06/13

[#37097] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4559] Proc#== does not match the documented behaviour — Usaku NAKAMURA <redmine@...> 2011/06/13

[#46410] [ruby-trunk - Bug #4559] Proc#== does not match the documented behaviour — "ko1 (Koichi Sasada)" <redmine@...> 2012/07/14

[#47645] [ruby-trunk - Bug #4559] Proc#== does not match the documented behaviour — "ko1 (Koichi Sasada)" <redmine@...> 2012/09/22

[#35633] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4289] Timeouts in threads cause SEGV — Eric Wong <redmine@...>

1 message 2011/04/06

[#35634] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4289] Timeouts in threads cause SEGV — Eric Wong <redmine@...>

1 message 2011/04/07

[#35635] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4289] Timeouts in threads cause SEGV — Eric Wong <redmine@...>

1 message 2011/04/07

[#35636] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4560][Open] [PATCH] lib/net/protocol.rb: avoid exceptions in rbuf_fill — Eric Wong <redmine@...>

6 messages 2011/04/07
[#35690] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4560] [PATCH] lib/net/protocol.rb: avoid exceptions in rbuf_fill — redmine@... 2011/04/10

[#35694] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4560] [PATCH] lib/net/protocol.rb: avoid exceptions in rbuf_fill — Eric Wong <normalperson@...> 2011/04/10

[email protected] wrote:
[#43617] [ruby-trunk - Feature #4560][Assigned] [PATCH] lib/net/protocol.rb: avoid exceptions in rbuf_fill — "mame (Yusuke Endoh)" <mame@...> 2012/03/25

[#48522] [ruby-trunk - Feature #4560] [PATCH] lib/net/protocol.rb: avoid exceptions in rbuf_fill — "akr (Akira Tanaka)" <akr@...> 2012/10/28

[#86039] [Ruby trunk Feature#4560] [PATCH] lib/net/protocol.rb: avoid exceptions in rbuf_fill — mame@... 2018/03/08

Issue #4560 has been updated by mame (Yusuke Endoh).

[#35637] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4561][Open] 1.9.2 requires parentheses around argument of method call in an array, where 1.8.7 did not — Dave Schweisguth <redmine@...>

9 messages 2011/04/07
[#35638] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4561] 1.9.2 requires parentheses around argument of method call in an array, where 1.8.7 did not — Dave Schweisguth <redmine@...> 2011/04/07

[#35640] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4561][Assigned] 1.9.2 requires parentheses around argument of method call in an array, where 1.8.7 did not — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2011/04/07

[#35642] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4561] 1.9.2 requires parentheses around argument of method call in an array, where 1.8.7 did not — Benoit Daloze <redmine@...> 2011/04/07

[#36994] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4561] 1.9.2 requires parentheses around argument of method call in an array, where 1.8.7 did not — Koichi Sasada <redmine@...> 2011/06/11

[#37029] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4561] 1.9.2 requires parentheses around argument of method call in an array, where 1.8.7 did not — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2011/06/11

Hi,
[#37191] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4561] 1.9.2 requires parentheses around argument of method call in an array, where 1.8.7 did not — Julian Raschke <julian@...> 2011/06/17

[#37491] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4561] 1.9.2 requires parentheses around argument of method call in an array, where 1.8.7 did not — Hiroshi NAKAMURA <nakahiro@...> 2011/06/26

[#37516] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4561][Closed] 1.9.2 requires parentheses around argument of method call in an array, where 1.8.7 did not — Koichi Sasada <redmine@...> 2011/06/26

[#35639] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4553][Open] [PATCH] Add Set#pick and Set#pop — Michael Edgar <adgar@...>

I put this on the 1.9 redmine, but for some reason it appears no e-mail =

1 message 2011/04/07

[#35643] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4541] Inconsistent Array.slice() — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...>

1 message 2011/04/07

[#35644] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #4563][Open] Dir#tell broken — Daniel Berger <redmine@...>

6 messages 2011/04/07
[#35655] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #4563][Rejected] Dir#tell broken — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2011/04/08

[#35657] Re: [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #4563][Rejected] Dir#tell broken — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2011/04/08

[#35658] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #4563] Dir#tell broken — Daniel Berger <redmine@...> 2011/04/08

[#35661] Re: [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #4563] Dir#tell broken — Eric Wong <normalperson@...> 2011/04/08

Daniel Berger <[email protected]> wrote:
[#35663] Re: [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #4563] Dir#tell broken — Daniel Berger <djberg96@...> 2011/04/08

On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 12:29 AM, Eric Wong <[email protected]> wrote:

[#35645] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4553] Add Set#pick and Set#pop — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...>

2 messages 2011/04/07
[#35651] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4553] Add Set#pick and Set#pop — Michael Edgar <adgar@...> 2011/04/07

The existence of `Set#first` is an artifact of Set including Enumerable =

[#35648] mvm branch status? — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>

Hello, I noticed the "mvm" branch in SVN hasn't been updated in over a year.

10 messages 2011/04/07
[#35649] Re: mvm branch status? — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2011/04/07

Hi Eric.
[#35650] Re: mvm branch status? — Evan Phoenix <evan@...> 2011/04/07

Has there been any thought on solving the C extension problem in MVM? In the present state, I've stopped working on it in Rubinius because there is no workable solution if there are C extensions in the mix.
[#35652] Re: mvm branch status? — Eric Wong <normalperson@...> 2011/04/07

Evan Phoenix <[email protected]> wrote:
[#35691] Re: mvm branch status? — Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...> 2011/04/10

On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 6:18 PM, Eric Wong <[email protected]> wrote:
[#35698] Re: mvm branch status? — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2011/04/11

Hi,
[#35728] Re: mvm branch status? — Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...> 2011/04/12

On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 11:28 PM, Urabe Shyouhei <[email protected]> w=
[#35730] Re: mvm branch status? — Eric Wong <normalperson@...> 2011/04/12

Charles Oliver Nutter <[email protected]> wrote:
[#35758] Re: mvm branch status? — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2011/04/14

Hi,
[#35749] Re: mvm branch status? — Hiroshi Nakamura <nakahiro@...> 2011/04/14

Hi,

[#35656] [Backport87 - Backport #4552][Rejected] macaddr-1.0.0 does not read mac address in opensolaris — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...>

1 message 2011/04/08

[#35659] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4549] Can't start class names with non us-ascii chars — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...>

1 message 2011/04/08

[#35660] [Ruby - Feature #2350] Unicode specific functionality on String in 1.9 — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...>

1 message 2011/04/08

[#35664] [Backport92 - Backport #4357] Please backport r30629 and r30630 to 1_9_2 — Brendten Eickstaedt <redmine@...>

1 message 2011/04/08

[#35666] caching of the ancestor chain — Xavier Noria <fxn@...>

Why does Ruby cache the ancestors chain? I mean, not why the implementation i=

9 messages 2011/04/09
[#35667] Re: caching of the ancestor chain — Xavier Noria <fxn@...> 2011/04/09

Ah, in case it is not clear, where I find the metaphor broken is in that you=
[#35668] Re: caching of the ancestor chain — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2011/04/09

Hi,
[#35692] Re: caching of the ancestor chain — Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...> 2011/04/10

On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 7:56 PM, Yukihiro Matsumoto <[email protected]> wro=
[#35693] Re: caching of the ancestor chain — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2011/04/10

Hi,
[#35720] Re: caching of the ancestor chain — Xavier Noria <fxn@...> 2011/04/12

On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 1:08 AM, Charles Oliver Nutter
[#35729] Re: caching of the ancestor chain — Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...> 2011/04/12

On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 3:53 AM, Xavier Noria <[email protected]> wrote:
[#35733] Re: caching of the ancestor chain — Xavier Noria <fxn@...> 2011/04/13

What's the downside of the naive implementation?
[#35745] Re: caching of the ancestor chain — Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...> 2011/04/13

On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 2:20 AM, Xavier Noria <[email protected]> wrote:

[#35672] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4289] Timeouts in threads cause SEGV — Eric Wong <redmine@...>

2 messages 2011/04/09
[#35809] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4289] Timeouts in threads cause SEGV — Eric Wong <normalperson@...> 2011/04/19

Eric Wong <[email protected]> wrote:

[#35678] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4564][Open] mingw-w64, truncate, ftruncate and ftello -- properly evalute it's existence — Luis Lavena <redmine@...>

8 messages 2011/04/09
[#35695] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4564][Assigned] mingw-w64, truncate, ftruncate and ftello -- properly evalute it's existence — redmine@... 2011/04/11

[#35710] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4564][Closed] mingw-w64, truncate, ftruncate and ftello -- properly evalute it's existence — redmine@... 2011/04/11

[#35863] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4564][Open] mingw-w64, truncate, ftruncate and ftello -- properly evalute it's existence — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2011/04/24

[#35867] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4564] mingw-w64, truncate, ftruncate and ftello -- properly evalute it's existence — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2011/04/24

[#35893] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4564] mingw-w64, truncate, ftruncate and ftello -- properly evalute it's existence — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2011/04/25

[#36391] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4564] mingw-w64, truncate, ftruncate and ftello -- properly evalute it's existence — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2011/05/22

[#36394] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4564] mingw-w64, truncate, ftruncate and ftello -- properly evalute it's existence — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2011/05/22

Hi,

[#35679] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4565][Open] incompatible change at rev.31169 about autoload — Hidetoshi Nagai <redmine@...>

3 messages 2011/04/09
[#35696] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4565][Assigned] incompatible change at rev.31169 about autoload — redmine@... 2011/04/11

[#35810] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4565][Closed] incompatible change at rev.31169 about autoload — redmine@... 2011/04/19

[#35683] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4566][Open] followup of — jojelino lastname <redmine@...>

5 messages 2011/04/10
[#35697] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4566] followup of — redmine@... 2011/04/11

[#35712] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4566] followup of — redmine@... 2011/04/11

[#35770] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4566][Assigned] followup of — redmine@... 2011/04/15

[#37868] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4566][Third Party's Issue] followup of — Motohiro KOSAKI <kosaki.motohiro@...> 2011/07/08

[#35686] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4567][Open] BigDecimal::ROUND_HALF_DOWN — redmine@...

5 messages 2011/04/10
[#35688] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4567][Assigned] BigDecimal::ROUND_HALF_DOWN — redmine@... 2011/04/10

[#37435] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4567] BigDecimal::ROUND_HALF_DOWN — Hiroshi NAKAMURA <nakahiro@...> 2011/06/26

[#37817] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4567] BigDecimal::ROUND_HALF_DOWN — Shane Emmons <semmons99@...> 2011/07/05

[#37839] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4567][Closed] BigDecimal::ROUND_HALF_DOWN — Kenta Murata <muraken@...> 2011/07/07

[#35699] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4568][Open] [PATCH] file.c (rb_group_member): kill 256K of stack usage — redmine@...

4 messages 2011/04/11
[#35700] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4568][Open] [PATCH] file.c (rb_group_member): kill 256K of stack usage — Eric Wong <normalperson@...> 2011/04/11

Lowering RUBY_STACK_MIN_LIMIT to 64KB across the board in
[#35731] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4568][Open] [PATCH] file.c (rb_group_member): kill 256K of stack usage — Eric Wong <normalperson@...> 2011/04/12

Eric Wong <[email protected]> wrote:
[#35701] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4568][Closed] [PATCH] file.c (rb_group_member): kill 256K of stack usage — redmine@... 2011/04/11

[#35707] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4569][Open] Replace IPAddr with IPAddress — redmine@...

13 messages 2011/04/11
[#36427] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4569] Replace IPAddr with IPAddress — Marco Ceresa <ceresa@...> 2011/05/24

[#35718] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4569][Assigned] Replace IPAddr with IPAddress — redmine@... 2011/04/12

[#35721] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4569] Replace IPAddr with IPAddress — redmine@... 2011/04/12

[#35736] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4569] Replace IPAddr with IPAddress — redmine@... 2011/04/13

[#36260] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4569] Replace IPAddr with IPAddress — Marco Ceresa <ceresa@...> 2011/05/17

[#36312] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4569] Replace IPAddr with IPAddress — Julien A <schmurfy@...> 2011/05/18

[#38874] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4569] Replace IPAddr with IPAddress — Marco Ceresa <ceresa@...> 2011/08/09

[#48233] [ruby-trunk - Feature #4569] Replace IPAddr with IPAddress — "ko1 (Koichi Sasada)" <redmine@...> 2012/10/25

[#48267] [ruby-trunk - Feature #4569] Replace IPAddr with IPAddress — "ceresa@... (Marco Ceresa)" <ceresa@...> 2012/10/25

[#48286] [ruby-trunk - Feature #4569] Replace IPAddr with IPAddress — "knu (Akinori MUSHA)" <knu@...> 2012/10/25

[#48904] [ruby-trunk - Feature #4569] Replace IPAddr with IPAddress — "ceresa@... (Marco Ceresa)" <ceresa@...> 2012/11/05

[#49944] [ruby-trunk - Feature #4569][Closed] Replace IPAddr with IPAddress — "mame (Yusuke Endoh)" <mame@...> 2012/11/24

[#35711] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4570][Open] [PATCH v2] io.c (rb_io_close): release GVL if possible — redmine@...

1 message 2011/04/11

[#35713] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4571][Open] YAML.load given an ISO8601 timestamp creates an incorrect value for usec — redmine@...

5 messages 2011/04/11
[#35719] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4571][Assigned] YAML.load given an ISO8601 timestamp creates an incorrect value for usec — redmine@... 2011/04/12

[#36011] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4571] YAML.load given an ISO8601 timestamp creates an incorrect value for usec — Tinco Andringa <mail@...> 2011/05/05

[#36012] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4571] YAML.load given an ISO8601 timestamp creates an incorrect value for usec — Shyouhei Urabe <shyouhei@...> 2011/05/05

[#36017] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4571] YAML.load given an ISO8601 timestamp creates an incorrect value for usec — Aaron Patterson <aaron@...> 2011/05/05

On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 11:31:14AM +0900, Shyouhei Urabe wrote:

[#35714] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4553] Add Set#pick and Set#pop — redmine@...

1 message 2011/04/12

[#35717] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4572][Open] URI.encode_www_form_component and decode_www_form_component are not threadsafe — redmine@...

1 message 2011/04/12

[#35722] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4573][Open] [BUG] Segmentation fault - Ruby interpreter (CUI) 1.9.2p180 [i386-mingw32] has stopped working — redmine@...

8 messages 2011/04/12
[#35818] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4573][Feedback] [BUG] Segmentation fault - Ruby interpreter (CUI) 1.9.2p180 [i386-mingw32] has stopped working — redmine@... 2011/04/19

[#35811] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4573] [BUG] Segmentation fault - Ruby interpreter (CUI) 1.9.2p180 [i386-mingw32] has stopped working — redmine@... 2011/04/19

[#35812] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4573][Assigned] [BUG] Segmentation fault - Ruby interpreter (CUI) 1.9.2p180 [i386-mingw32] has stopped working — redmine@... 2011/04/19

[#35824] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4573] [BUG] Segmentation fault - Ruby interpreter (CUI) 1.9.2p180 [i386-mingw32] has stopped working — redmine@... 2011/04/20

[#35826] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4573] [BUG] Segmentation fault - Ruby interpreter (CUI) 1.9.2p180 [i386-mingw32] has stopped working — redmine@... 2011/04/20

[#35834] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4573] [BUG] Segmentation fault - Ruby interpreter (CUI) 1.9.2p180 [i386-mingw32] has stopped working — redmine@... 2011/04/20

[#35837] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4573][Closed] [BUG] Segmentation fault - Ruby interpreter (CUI) 1.9.2p180 [i386-mingw32] has stopped working — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2011/04/20

[#35723] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4541] Inconsistent Array.slice() — redmine@...

1 message 2011/04/12

[#35724] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4553] Add Set#pick and Set#pop — redmine@...

2 messages 2011/04/12
[#35727] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4553] Add Set#pick and Set#pop — Michael Edgar <adgar@...> 2011/04/12

My one concern about the name #take was that it may imply removal. I was =

[#35734] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4574][Open] Numeric#within — redmine@...

16 messages 2011/04/13
[#35737] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4574] Numeric#within — redmine@... 2011/04/13

[#35738] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4574] Numeric#within — redmine@... 2011/04/13

[#35740] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4574] Numeric#within — Yusuke ENDOH <mame@...> 2011/04/13

Hello,
[#35742] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4574] Numeric#within — Nikolai Weibull <now@...> 2011/04/13

On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 14:49, <[email protected]> wrote:
[#35739] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4574] Numeric#within — redmine@... 2011/04/13

[#35743] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4574] Numeric#within — redmine@... 2011/04/13

[#35744] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4574] Numeric#within — Yusuke ENDOH <mame@...> 2011/04/13

Hello,
[#35747] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4574] Numeric#within — redmine@... 2011/04/14

[#35748] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4574] Numeric#within — redmine@... 2011/04/14

[#35750] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4574] Numeric#within — redmine@... 2011/04/14

[#35751] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4574] Numeric#within — Nikolai Weibull <now@...> 2011/04/14

On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 12:49, <[email protected]> wrote:
[#35757] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4574] Numeric#within — Clifford Heath <clifford.heath@...> 2011/04/14

On 14/04/2011, at 9:40 PM, Nikolai Weibull wrote:
[#37956] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4574][Assigned] Numeric#within — Motohiro KOSAKI <kosaki.motohiro@...> 2011/07/10

[#44259] [ruby-trunk - Feature #4574][Rejected] Numeric#within — "matz (Yukihiro Matsumoto)" <matz@...> 2012/04/10

[#66837] [ruby-trunk - Feature #4574] Numeric#within — findchris@... 2014/12/15

Issue #4574 has been updated by Chris Johnson.

[#35753] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576][Open] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number — redmine@...

61 messages 2011/04/14
[#35802] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576][Closed] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number — redmine@... 2011/04/18

[#35804] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number — redmine@... 2011/04/18

[#35805] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number — "U.Nakamura" <usa@...> 2011/04/18

Hello,
[#39198] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number — Vit Ondruch <v.ondruch@...> 2011/08/30

[#39508] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number — V咜 Ondruch <v.ondruch@...> 2011/09/13

Can somebody please reopen this issue? Since the test suite fix is
[#39509] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2011/09/13

(09/13/2011 06:56 PM), V咜 Ondruch wrote:
[#39513] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number — Michal Suchanek <hramrach@...> 2011/09/13

On 13 September 2011 12:28, Urabe Shyouhei <[email protected]> wrote:
[#39510] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number — Vit Ondruch <v.ondruch@...> 2011/09/13

[#39524] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number — Yusuke ENDOH <mame@...> 2011/09/13

Hello,
[#39549] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number — Michal Suchanek <hramrach@...> 2011/09/14

On 13 September 2011 17:19, Yusuke ENDOH <[email protected]> wrote:
[#39511] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number — Vit Ondruch <v.ondruch@...> 2011/09/13

[#39525] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number — Ales Marecek <amarecek@...> 2011/09/13

[#39515] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number — Shyouhei Urabe <shyouhei@...> 2011/09/13

[#39516] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number — Vit Ondruch <v.ondruch@...> 2011/09/13

[#39517] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number — Vit Ondruch <v.ondruch@...> 2011/09/13

[#39518] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number — Shyouhei Urabe <shyouhei@...> 2011/09/13

[#39519] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number — Vit Ondruch <v.ondruch@...> 2011/09/13

[#39520] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number — Shyouhei Urabe <shyouhei@...> 2011/09/13

[#39521] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number — Ales Marecek <amarecek@...> 2011/09/13

[#39522] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number — Kenta Murata <muraken@...> 2011/09/13

[#39523] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number — Kenta Murata <muraken@...> 2011/09/13

[#39526] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number — Kenta Murata <muraken@...> 2011/09/13

[#39566] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number — Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core@...> 2011/09/15

[#39582] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2011/09/16

2011/9/16 Marc-Andre Lafortune <[email protected]>:
[#39584] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number — Michal Suchanek <hramrach@...> 2011/09/16

On 16 September 2011 15:49, Tanaka Akira <[email protected]> wrote:
[#39586] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number — Yusuke ENDOH <mame@...> 2011/09/16

Hello,
[#39587] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number — Michal Suchanek <hramrach@...> 2011/09/16

On 16 September 2011 16:18, Yusuke ENDOH <[email protected]> wrote:
[#39585] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2011/09/16

2011/9/16 Michal Suchanek <[email protected]>:
[#39567] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number — Kenta Murata <muraken@...> 2011/09/16

Hi,
[#39569] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number — "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...> 2011/09/16

2011/9/16 Kenta Murata <[email protected]>:
[#39577] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number — Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core-mailing-list@...> 2011/09/16

I re-committed as r33285 because
[#39578] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number — Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core-mailing-list@...> 2011/09/16

PS: I should have modified the commit message to say that this fixes
[#39576] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number — Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core-mailing-list@...> 2011/09/16

Hi,
[#39579] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number — Yui NARUSE <naruse@...> 2011/09/16

[#39580] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number — Yui NARUSE <naruse@...> 2011/09/16

[#39581] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number — "U.Nakamura" <usa@...> 2011/09/16

Hello,
[#39588] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576][Open] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number — Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core@...> 2011/09/16

[#39589] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number — Shyouhei Urabe <shyouhei@...> 2011/09/16

[#39590] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number — Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core@...> 2011/09/16

[#39593] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2011/09/16

2011/9/17 Marc-Andre Lafortune <[email protected]>:
[#39595] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2011/09/17

2011/9/17 Tanaka Akira <[email protected]>:
[#39602] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number — Yusuke ENDOH <mame@...> 2011/09/17

Hello,
[#39605] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2011/09/17

2011/9/17 Yusuke ENDOH <[email protected]>:
[#39612] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2011/09/17

2011/9/17 Yusuke ENDOH <[email protected]>:
[#39613] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number — Michal Suchanek <hramrach@...> 2011/09/18

On 17 September 2011 07:05, Yusuke ENDOH <[email protected]> wrote:
[#39604] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number — "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...> 2011/09/17

(2011/09/17 9:07), Tanaka Akira wrote:
[#39606] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number — Yusuke ENDOH <mame@...> 2011/09/17

Hello,
[#39607] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number — "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...> 2011/09/17

(2011/09/17 16:14), Yusuke ENDOH wrote:
[#39608] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number — Masahiro TANAKA <masa16.tanaka@...> 2011/09/17

I have not been watching ruby-core, but let me give a comment for this issu=
[#39637] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2011/09/20

2011/9/17 Masahiro TANAKA <[email protected]>:
[#39655] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number — Masahiro TANAKA <masa16.tanaka@...> 2011/09/21

2011/9/20 Tanaka Akira <[email protected]>:
[#39656] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number — masa <masa16.tanaka@...> 2011/09/21

I haven't explained the reason of the error estimation in
[#39657] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number — Michal Suchanek <hramrach@...> 2011/09/21

On 21 September 2011 14:25, masa <[email protected]> wrote:
[#39668] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number — Kurt Stephens <ks@...> 2011/09/22

A basis that sums to unity reduces error, due to convex hull property:
[#39720] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number — "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...> 2011/09/26

2011/9/22 Kurt Stephens <[email protected]>:
[#39828] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number — Masahiro TANAKA <masa16.tanaka@...> 2011/10/02

2011/9/17 Masahiro TANAKA <[email protected]>:
[#39649] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number — Yui NARUSE <naruse@...> 2011/09/21

[#39741] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number — Yui NARUSE <naruse@...> 2011/09/27

[#40002] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576][Open] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number — Yui NARUSE <naruse@...> 2011/10/06

[#40110] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number — Yui NARUSE <naruse@...> 2011/10/11

[#35754] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4577][Open] (int...float).max should not raise an error — redmine@...

8 messages 2011/04/14
[#35756] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4577][Open] (int...float).max should not raise an error — Masaya TARUI <tarui@...> 2011/04/14

Hi,
[#35760] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4577][Open] (int...float).max should not raise an error — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2011/04/15

Hi,
[#35763] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4577] (int...float).max should not raise an error — redmine@... 2011/04/15

[#35766] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4577] (int...float).max should not raise an error — redmine@... 2011/04/15

[#37015] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4577][Assigned] (int...float).max should not raise an error — Koichi Sasada <redmine@...> 2011/06/11

[#46416] [ruby-trunk - Bug #4577][Rejected] (int...float).max should not raise an error — "matz (Yukihiro Matsumoto)" <matz@...> 2012/07/14

[#48110] [ruby-trunk - Bug #4577] (int...float).max should not raise an error — "elninorian (menuju sukses sukses)" <rian_barkah88@...> 2012/10/19

[#35759] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #4578][Open] Fixnum.freeze not frozen? — redmine@...

6 messages 2011/04/14
[#35761] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #4578] Fixnum.freeze not frozen? — redmine@... 2011/04/15

[#35767] Re: [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #4578] Fixnum.freeze not frozen? — Magnus Holm <judofyr@...> 2011/04/15

Isn't technically all Fixnums "frozen" (because you can't modify the state)?
[#35768] Re: [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #4578] Fixnum.freeze not frozen? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2011/04/15

Hi,
[#35819] Re: [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #4578] Fixnum.freeze not frozen? — Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...> 2011/04/19

On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 12:37 AM, Yukihiro Matsumoto <[email protected]> w=
[#35906] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #4578] Fixnum.freeze not frozen? — Russell Bevers <rbevers@...> 2011/04/26

[#35762] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #4338] random number generator not reseeded after fork in 1.8 — redmine@...

1 message 2011/04/15

[#35764] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #4338][Assigned] random number generator not reseeded after fork in 1.8 — redmine@...

1 message 2011/04/15

[#35765] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4579][Open] SecureRandom + OpenSSL may repeat with fork — redmine@...

27 messages 2011/04/15
[#35769] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4579] SecureRandom + OpenSSL may repeat with fork — redmine@... 2011/04/15

[#35771] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4579] SecureRandom + OpenSSL may repeat with fork — redmine@... 2011/04/15

[#35773] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4579] SecureRandom + OpenSSL may repeat with fork — redmine@... 2011/04/15

[#35774] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4579] SecureRandom + OpenSSL may repeat with fork — redmine@... 2011/04/15

[#35779] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4579] SecureRandom + OpenSSL may repeat with fork — redmine@... 2011/04/15

[#35780] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4579] SecureRandom + OpenSSL may repeat with fork — redmine@... 2011/04/15

[#35782] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4579] SecureRandom + OpenSSL may repeat with fork — KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...> 2011/04/16

Hi
[#35822] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4579] SecureRandom + OpenSSL may repeat with fork — redmine@... 2011/04/20

[#35823] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4579] SecureRandom + OpenSSL may repeat with fork — Eric Wong <normalperson@...> 2011/04/20

Hiroshi NAKAMURA wrote:
[#37016] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4579][Assigned] SecureRandom + OpenSSL may repeat with fork — Koichi Sasada <redmine@...> 2011/06/11

[#37024] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4579] SecureRandom + OpenSSL may repeat with fork — Hiroshi NAKAMURA <nakahiro@...> 2011/06/11

[#37030] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4579] SecureRandom + OpenSSL may repeat with fork — Motohiro KOSAKI <kosaki.motohiro@...> 2011/06/11

[#37073] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4579] SecureRandom + OpenSSL may repeat with fork — Eric Wong <normalperson@...> 2011/06/13

Motohiro KOSAKI <[email protected]> wrote:
[#37053] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4579] SecureRandom + OpenSSL may repeat with fork — Akira Tanaka <akr@...> 2011/06/12

[#37058] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4579] SecureRandom + OpenSSL may repeat with fork — Motohiro KOSAKI <kosaki.motohiro@...> 2011/06/12

[#37064] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4579] SecureRandom + OpenSSL may repeat with fork — Akira Tanaka <akr@...> 2011/06/12

[#37072] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4579] SecureRandom + OpenSSL may repeat with fork — Motohiro KOSAKI <kosaki.motohiro@...> 2011/06/13

[#37077] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4579] SecureRandom + OpenSSL may repeat with fork — Akira Tanaka <akr@...> 2011/06/13

[#37166] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4579] SecureRandom + OpenSSL may repeat with fork — Hiroshi Nakamura <nakahiro@...> 2011/06/16

On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 17:07, Akira Tanaka <[email protected]> wrote:
[#37119] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4579][Closed] SecureRandom + OpenSSL may repeat with fork — Akira Tanaka <akr@...> 2011/06/13

[#37165] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4579] SecureRandom + OpenSSL may repeat with fork — Hiroshi NAKAMURA <nakahiro@...> 2011/06/16

[#37168] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4579] SecureRandom + OpenSSL may repeat with fork — Shyouhei Urabe <shyouhei@...> 2011/06/16

[#37169] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4579] SecureRandom + OpenSSL may repeat with fork — Hiroshi Nakamura <nakahiro@...> 2011/06/16

> Hmm, OK. =A0Go ahead.
[#37302] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4579] SecureRandom + OpenSSL may repeat with fork — Akira Tanaka <akr@...> 2011/06/22

[#37309] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4579] SecureRandom + OpenSSL may repeat with fork — Hiroshi Nakamura <nakahiro@...> 2011/06/23

Hi,
[#37318] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4579] SecureRandom + OpenSSL may repeat with fork — Akira Tanaka <akr@...> 2011/06/23

[#35775] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4580][Open] actionpack-3.0.6/lib/action_controller/metal/renderers.rb: 74 SEGFAULT — redmine@...

2 messages 2011/04/15
[#35776] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4580][Third Party's Issue] actionpack-3.0.6/lib/action_controller/metal/renderers.rb: 74 SEGFAULT — redmine@... 2011/04/15

[#35777] hashes are not consistent across ruby processes? — Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@...>

Hello all.

5 messages 2011/04/15
[#35778] Re: hashes are not consistent across ruby processes? — Magnus Holm <judofyr@...> 2011/04/15

Just use a proper hash function (MD5, SHA1)?
[#35784] Re: hashes are not consistent across ruby processes? — Yusuke ENDOH <mame@...> 2011/04/16

Hello,
[#35803] Re: hashes are not consistent across ruby processes? — Kenta Murata <muraken@...> 2011/04/18

Hi,
[#35835] Re: hashes are not consistent across ruby processes? — Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@...> 2011/04/20

> I think it is described in the following page.

[#35781] Patch to Net::HTTP to allow overriding SSL certificate hostname verification — Patrick Higgins <patrick133t@...>

I have a need to connect to an https server using Net::HTTP which=0A(incorr=

3 messages 2011/04/16
[#35783] Re: Patch to Net::HTTP to allow overriding SSL certificate hostname verification — "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...> 2011/04/16

(2011/04/16 9:21), Patrick Higgins wrote:
[#35820] Re: Patch to Net::HTTP to allow overriding SSL certificate hostname verification — Hiroshi Nakamura <nakahiro@...> 2011/04/20

On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 09:21, Patrick Higgins <[email protected]> wrote:

[#35785] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4581][Open] Documentation for Process.times is outdated — redmine@...

2 messages 2011/04/16
[#36106] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4581] Documentation for Process.times is outdated — Tomoyuki Chikanaga <nagachika00@...> 2011/05/11

[#35788] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4582][Open] date_tmx.h file missing — redmine@...

3 messages 2011/04/16
[#35795] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4582] date_tmx.h file missing — redmine@... 2011/04/17

[#35801] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4582][Closed] date_tmx.h file missing — redmine@... 2011/04/18

[#35790] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4583][Open] trace doesn't work for methods set up by attr_* — redmine@...

11 messages 2011/04/17
[#35792] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4583] trace doesn't work for methods set up by attr_* — redmine@... 2011/04/17

[#35794] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4583][Assigned] trace doesn't work for methods set up by attr_* — redmine@... 2011/04/17

[#35796] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4583] trace doesn't work for methods set up by attr_* — redmine@... 2011/04/17

[#35797] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4583] trace doesn't work for methods set up by attr_* — redmine@... 2011/04/17

[#35798] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4583] trace doesn't work for methods set up by attr_* — redmine@... 2011/04/17

[#35799] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4583] trace doesn't work for methods set up by attr_* — redmine@... 2011/04/17

[#35800] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4583] trace doesn't work for methods set up by attr_* — redmine@... 2011/04/17

[#36928] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4583][Open] trace doesn't work for methods set up by attr_* — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...> 2011/06/10

Hi,
[#36998] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4583][Feedback] trace doesn't work for methods set up by attr_* — Koichi Sasada <redmine@...> 2011/06/11

[#48570] [ruby-trunk - Bug #4583][Rejected] trace doesn't work for methods set up by attr_* — "ko1 (Koichi Sasada)" <redmine@...> 2012/10/30

[#35791] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #4584][Open] trace doesn't work for methods set up by attr_* — redmine@...

2 messages 2011/04/17
[#35793] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #4584][Rejected] trace doesn't work for methods set up by attr_* — redmine@... 2011/04/17

[#35806] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4585][Open] DLEXT in win32/Makefile.sub is not correct for building with VisualStudio 2008 — redmine@...

4 messages 2011/04/18
[#35807] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4585] DLEXT in win32/Makefile.sub is not correct for building with VisualStudio 2008 — redmine@... 2011/04/18

[#35816] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4585] DLEXT in win32/Makefile.sub is not correct for building with VisualStudio 2008 — redmine@... 2011/04/19

[#35817] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4585][Closed] DLEXT in win32/Makefile.sub is not correct for building with VisualStudio 2008 — redmine@... 2011/04/19

[#35808] Re: Welcome to our (ruby-core ML) You are added automatically — program uni <msgintest@...>

On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 11:39 PM, <[email protected]> wrote:

1 message 2011/04/18

[#35813] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4320] Bus Error in digest/sha2 on sparc — redmine@...

1 message 2011/04/19

[#35814] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4320] Bus Error in digest/sha2 on sparc — redmine@...

1 message 2011/04/19

[#35815] Missing length check in rb_str_each_line? — Nikolai Weibull <now@...>

In rb_str_each line, the following test is performed:

1 message 2011/04/19

[#35821] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #435] open-uri.rb 407 Proxy Authentication Required (OpenURI::HTTPError) — redmine@...

1 message 2011/04/20

[#35825] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #4587][Open] RMATCH_REGS definition is wrong — redmine@...

4 messages 2011/04/20
[#36016] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #4587] RMATCH_REGS definition is wrong — Nikolai Weibull <now@...> 2011/05/05

[#36018] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #4587][Closed] RMATCH_REGS definition is wrong — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2011/05/05

[#36022] Re: [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #4587][Closed] RMATCH_REGS definition is wrong — Nikolai Weibull <now@...> 2011/05/06

On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 01:04, Yukihiro Matsumoto <[email protected]> wrote:

[#35827] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #4588][Open] exec(env, cmd) fails in Ruby 1.8; works in 1.9 — redmine@...

3 messages 2011/04/20
[#35836] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #4588] exec(env, cmd) fails in Ruby 1.8; works in 1.9 — Suraj Kurapati <sunaku@...> 2011/04/20

[#38129] [Ruby 1.8 - Feature #4588][Rejected] exec(env, cmd) fails in Ruby 1.8; works in 1.9 — Akinori MUSHA <knu@...> 2011/07/17

[#35828] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4589][Open] add Queue#each() method and include Enumerable — redmine@...

10 messages 2011/04/20
[#35920] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4589] add Queue#each() method and include Enumerable — Charles Nutter <headius@...> 2011/04/27

[#35941] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4589] add Queue#each() method and include Enumerable — Eric Hodel <[email protected]> 2011/04/28

[#38528] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4589] add Queue#each() method and include Enumerable — Suraj Kurapati <sunaku@...> 2011/07/26

[#38536] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4589] add Queue#each() method and include Enumerable — Eric Hodel <[email protected]> 2011/07/26

[#38559] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4589] add Queue#each() method and include Enumerable — Alex Young <alex@...> 2011/07/27

On 27/07/11 00:34, Eric Hodel wrote:
[#43618] [ruby-trunk - Feature #4589][Assigned] add Queue#each() method and include Enumerable — "mame (Yusuke Endoh)" <mame@...> 2012/03/25

[#48561] [ruby-trunk - Feature #4589][Feedback] add Queue#each() method and include Enumerable — "ko1 (Koichi Sasada)" <redmine@...> 2012/10/29

[#48584] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #4589][Feedback] add Queue#each() method and include Enumerable — Aaron Patterson <tenderlove@...> 2012/10/30

On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 08:44:21AM +0900, ko1 (Koichi Sasada) wrote:
[#79348] [Ruby trunk Feature#4589][Closed] add Queue#each() method and include Enumerable — ko1@... 2017/01/31

Issue #4589 has been updated by Koichi Sasada.

[#35830] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #3436] Spawn the timer thread lazily — redmine@...

1 message 2011/04/20

[#35832] How should one use rb_reg_regsub in a library that is ment to be used both from 1.8 and 1.9? — Nikolai Weibull <now@...>

How should one use rb_reg_regsub in a library that is ment to be used

1 message 2011/04/20

[#35833] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4590][Open] documentation is wrong for srand — redmine@...

1 message 2011/04/20

[#35841] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #3840] Ruby 1.9.2p0 crashes using Rails 3.0 on repeated browser refresh — Hiroshi Shirosaki <h.shirosaki@...>

1 message 2011/04/21

[#35842] [Ruby 1.8 - Feature #4593][Open] xmlrpc does not support bigdecimal — Alex Tambellini <atambellini@...>

4 messages 2011/04/21
[#35846] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4593][Rejected] xmlrpc does not support bigdecimal — Kenta Murata <muraken@...> 2011/04/22

[#35843] [Ruby 1.8 - Feature #4593] xmlrpc does not support bigdecimal — Alex Tambellini <atambellini@...> 2011/04/21

[#35845] Re: [Ruby 1.8 - Feature #4593] xmlrpc does not support bigdecimal — Kenta Murata <muraken@...> 2011/04/22

Hi,

[#35844] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #3840] Ruby 1.9.2p0 crashes using Rails 3.0 on repeated browser refresh — Stephen Bannasch <stephen.bannasch@...>

1 message 2011/04/21

[#35847] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4594][Open] Don't depend on extension automagic — Nathan McSween <nwmcsween@...>

3 messages 2011/04/22
[#36021] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4594] Don't depend on extension automagic — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2011/05/06

[#37483] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4594][Rejected] Don't depend on extension automagic — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2011/06/26

[#35848] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4189][Assigned] FileUtils#ln_r — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...>

1 message 2011/04/22

[#35849] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4189] FileUtils#ln_r — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>

1 message 2011/04/22

[#35850] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4189] FileUtils#ln_r — Sakuro OZAWA <redmine@...>

1 message 2011/04/22

[#35851] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4421] [ext/openssl] Fix RSA public key encoding — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...>

1 message 2011/04/22

[#35852] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #3840] Ruby 1.9.2p0 crashes using Rails 3.0 on repeated browser refresh — Ian Viney <ian@...>

1 message 2011/04/22

[#35853] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4597][Open] YAML doesn't consider tab stops as whitespace in mappings — Dominik Honnef <dominikh@...>

3 messages 2011/04/22
[#35855] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4597] YAML doesn't consider tab stops as whitespace in mappings — Dominik Honnef <dominikh@...> 2011/04/22

[#35858] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4597][Rejected] YAML doesn't consider tab stops as whitespace in mappings — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2011/04/23

[#35854] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4598][Open] Net::SMTP should raise more helpfully when mail can't send — Tyler Kieft <tyler.kieft@...>

3 messages 2011/04/22
[#43619] [ruby-trunk - Feature #4598][Assigned] Net::SMTP should raise more helpfully when mail can't send — "mame (Yusuke Endoh)" <mame@...> 2012/03/25

[#44551] [ruby-trunk - Feature #4598] Net::SMTP should raise more helpfully when mail can't send — "mame (Yusuke Endoh)" <mame@...> 2012/04/23

[#35856] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4421] [ext/openssl] Fix RSA public key encoding — Martin Bosslet <Martin.Bosslet@...>

1 message 2011/04/22

[#35857] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #3131] add Kernel#Hash() method like Kernel#Array() — Suraj Kurapati <sunaku@...>

2 messages 2011/04/22
[#35859] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #3131] add Kernel#Hash() method like Kernel#Array() — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2011/04/23

Hi,

[#35860] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4600][Open] date/date_parse.c errors are breaking MinGW build — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...>

4 messages 2011/04/23
[#35872] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4600][Assigned] date/date_parse.c errors are breaking MinGW build — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2011/04/25

[#36055] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4600][Closed] date/date_parse.c errors are breaking MinGW build — tadayoshi funaba <redmine@...> 2011/05/09

[#36057] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4600] date/date_parse.c errors are breaking MinGW build — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2011/05/09

[#35861] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4601][Open] Re-ordering method parameters. — Nicos Gollan <gtdev@...>

6 messages 2011/04/23
[#43691] [ruby-trunk - Feature #4601][Closed] Re-ordering method parameters. — "mame (Yusuke Endoh)" <mame@...> 2012/03/26

[#35880] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4601] Re-ordering method parameters. — Joshua Ballanco <jballanc@...> 2011/04/25

[#35888] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4601] Re-ordering method parameters. — Yusuke Endoh <mame@...> 2011/04/25

[#35905] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4601] Re-ordering method parameters. — Nicos Gollan <gtdev@...> 2011/04/26

[#43620] [ruby-trunk - Feature #4601][Assigned] Re-ordering method parameters. — "mame (Yusuke Endoh)" <mame@...> 2012/03/25

[#35862] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #3840] Ruby 1.9.2p0 crashes using Rails 3.0 on repeated browser refresh — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...>

1 message 2011/04/23

[#35864] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4539] Array#zip_with — Jeremy Voorhis <jvoorhis@...>

1 message 2011/04/24

[#35865] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4102] Proposal for 'let'. A new approach using block-defaults in 1.9 — Tom Wardrop <tom@...>

2 messages 2011/04/24
[#35868] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4102] Proposal for 'let'. A new approach using block-defaults in 1.9 — Magnus Holm <judofyr@...> 2011/04/24

You can use begin/end-blocks or #tap:

[#35866] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4603][Open] lib/csv.rb: when the :encoding parameter is not provided, the encoding of CSV data is treated as ASCII-8BIT — yu nobuoka <nobuoka@...>

13 messages 2011/04/24
[#35871] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4603][Assigned] lib/csv.rb: when the :encoding parameter is not provided, the encoding of CSV data is treated as ASCII-8BIT — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2011/04/25

[#35873] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4603][Open] lib/csv.rb: when the :encoding parameter is not provided, the encoding of CSV data is treated as ASCII-8BIT — James Gray <james@...> 2011/04/25

On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 1:33 AM, yu nobuoka <[email protected]>wrote:
[#35875] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4603][Open] lib/csv.rb: when the :encoding parameter is not provided, the encoding of CSV data is treated as ASCII-8BIT — "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...> 2011/04/25

2011/4/25 James Gray <[email protected]>:
[#35878] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4603][Open] lib/csv.rb: when the :encoding parameter is not provided, the encoding of CSV data is treated as ASCII-8BIT — James Gray <james@...> 2011/04/25

On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 11:29 PM, NARUSE, Yui <[email protected]> wrote:
[#35907] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4603][Open] lib/csv.rb: when the :encoding parameter is not provided, the encoding of CSV data is treated as ASCII-8BIT — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2011/04/26

Hi,
[#35908] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4603][Open] lib/csv.rb: when the :encoding parameter is not provided, the encoding of CSV data is treated as ASCII-8BIT — James Gray <james@...> 2011/04/26

On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 11:27 AM, Nobuyoshi Nakada <[email protected]>wrote:
[#35876] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4603] lib/csv.rb: when the :encoding parameter is not provided, the encoding of CSV data is treated as ASCII-8BIT — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2011/04/25

[#35911] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4603] lib/csv.rb: when the :encoding parameter is not provided, the encoding of CSV data is treated as ASCII-8BIT — yu nobuoka <nobuoka@...> 2011/04/26

[#35912] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4603] lib/csv.rb: when the :encoding parameter is not provided, the encoding of CSV data is treated as ASCII-8BIT — James Gray <james@...> 2011/04/26

On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 3:13 PM, yu nobuoka <[email protected]>wrote:
[#44981] [ruby-trunk - Bug #4603] lib/csv.rb: when the :encoding parameter is not provided, the encoding of CSV data is treated as ASCII-8BIT — "theirishpenguin (Declan McGrath)" <declanmg@...> 2012/05/10

[#44984] [ruby-trunk - Bug #4603] lib/csv.rb: when the :encoding parameter is not provided, the encoding of CSV data is treated as ASCII-8BIT — "naruse (Yui NARUSE)" <naruse@...> 2012/05/10

[#44995] [ruby-trunk - Bug #4603] lib/csv.rb: when the :encoding parameter is not provided, the encoding of CSV data is treated as ASCII-8BIT — "theirishpenguin (Declan McGrath)" <declanmg@...> 2012/05/11

[#35869] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4608][Open] Ctrl-c to interrupt script causes hang and 100% cpu's core load — Roman Ralovets <roman@...>

5 messages 2011/04/24
[#35882] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4608] Ctrl-c to interrupt script causes hang and 100% cpu's core load — Roman Ralovets <roman@...> 2011/04/25

[#35903] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4608] Ctrl-c to interrupt script causes hang and 100% cpu's core load — Mr Corn <kontakt+ruby-lang@...> 2011/04/26

[#36002] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4608] Ctrl-c to interrupt script causes hang and 100% cpu's core load — Jason Earl <jason@...> 2011/05/04

[#36760] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4608][Third Party's Issue] Ctrl-c to interrupt script causes hang and 100% cpu's core load — Motohiro KOSAKI <kosaki.motohiro@...> 2011/06/05

[#35870] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4189] FileUtils#ln_r — Johan Holmberg <johan556@...>

1 message 2011/04/24

[#35874] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4609][Open] String#rpartition(regexp) has bug, when regexp contains quantifier — Joey Zhou <yimutang@...>

3 messages 2011/04/25
[#35927] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4609] String#rpartition(regexp) has bug, when regexp contains quantifier — Joey Zhou <yimutang@...> 2011/04/27

[#35928] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4609][Rejected] String#rpartition(regexp) has bug, when regexp contains quantifier — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2011/04/27

[#35877] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #3719] open-uri should allow redirects from http to https — Joseph Holsten <joseph@...>

1 message 2011/04/25

[#35879] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4610][Open] Proc#curry behavior is inconsistent with lambdas containing default argument values — Joshua Ballanco <jballanc@...>

11 messages 2011/04/25
[#35881] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4610] Proc#curry behavior is inconsistent with lambdas containing default argument values — Joshua Ballanco <jballanc@...> 2011/04/25

[#35885] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4610] Proc#curry behavior is inconsistent with lambdas containing default argument values — Yusuke Endoh <mame@...> 2011/04/25

[#35892] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4610] Proc#curry behavior is inconsistent with lambdas containing default argument values — Joshua Ballanco <jballanc@...> 2011/04/25

[#35904] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4610] Proc#curry behavior is inconsistent with lambdas containing default argument values — Yusuke ENDOH <mame@...> 2011/04/26

Hello,
[#35914] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4610] Proc#curry behavior is inconsistent with lambdas containing default argument values — Joshua Ballanco <jballanc@...> 2011/04/26

On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 7:57 AM, Yusuke ENDOH <[email protected]> wrote:
[#43621] [ruby-trunk - Feature #4610][Assigned] Proc#curry behavior is inconsistent with lambdas containing default argument values — "mame (Yusuke Endoh)" <mame@...> 2012/03/25

[#43622] [ruby-trunk - Feature #4610] Proc#curry behavior is inconsistent with lambdas containing default argument values — "mrkn (Kenta Murata)" <muraken@...> 2012/03/25

[#44072] [ruby-trunk - Feature #4610][Rejected] Proc#curry behavior is inconsistent with lambdas containing default argument values — "mame (Yusuke Endoh)" <mame@...> 2012/04/02

[#44099] [ruby-trunk - Feature #4610] Proc#curry behavior is inconsistent with lambdas containing default argument values — "jballanc (Joshua Ballanco)" <jballanc@...> 2012/04/03

[#44104] [ruby-trunk - Feature #4610] Proc#curry behavior is inconsistent with lambdas containing default argument values — "mame (Yusuke Endoh)" <mame@...> 2012/04/03

[#35883] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4611][Open] [BUG] Segementation fault reported — Deryl Doucette <me@...>

15 messages 2011/04/25
[#38047] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4611][Feedback] [BUG] Segementation fault reported — Hiroshi Nakamura <nakahiro@...> 2011/07/13

[#35884] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4611] [BUG] Segementation fault reported — Deryl Doucette <redmine@...> 2011/04/25

[#35886] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4611][Feedback] [BUG] Segementation fault reported — Shota Fukumori <sorah@...> 2011/04/25

[#37555] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4611][Feedback] [BUG] Segementation fault reported — Hiroshi Nakamura <nakahiro@...> 2011/06/27

Hi,
[#37566] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4611][Feedback] [BUG] Segementation fault reported — Hiroshi Nakamura <nakahiro@...> 2011/06/27

On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 11:32, Hiroshi Nakamura <[email protected]> wrote:
[#35887] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4611][Open] [BUG] Segementation fault reported — Shota Fukumori <sorah@...> 2011/04/25

[#35889] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4611] [BUG] Segementation fault reported — Deryl Doucette <redmine@...> 2011/04/25

[#35890] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4611] [BUG] Segementation fault reported — Deryl Doucette <redmine@...> 2011/04/25

[#36632] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4611] [BUG] Segementation fault reported — Peter Bell <peter@...> 2011/05/31

[#37140] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4611] [BUG] Segementation fault reported — Ruan Carlos <ruanltbg@...> 2011/06/14

[#37484] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4611][Assigned] [BUG] Segementation fault reported — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2011/06/26

[#37494] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4611] [BUG] Segementation fault reported — Hiroshi NAKAMURA <nakahiro@...> 2011/06/26

[#38065] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4611] [BUG] Segementation fault reported — Piotr Panasewicz <piotr.panasewicz@...> 2011/07/14

[#38074] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4611] [BUG] Segementation fault reported — Hiroshi Nakamura <nakahiro@...> 2011/07/15

[#35891] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4612][Open] Segmentation fault in fiber GC mark cycle — Serge Balyuk <serge@...>

4 messages 2011/04/25
[#36136] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4612] Segmentation fault in fiber GC mark cycle — Serge Balyuk <serge@...> 2011/05/12

[#36104] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4612] Segmentation fault in fiber GC mark cycle — Serge Balyuk <serge@...> 2011/05/11

[#36105] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4612] Segmentation fault in fiber GC mark cycle — Tomoyuki Chikanaga <nagachika00@...> 2011/05/11

[#35894] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4613][Open] define_method lacks trace events — Roger Pack <rogerpack2005@...>

5 messages 2011/04/25
[#36929] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4613][Open] define_method lacks trace events — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...> 2011/06/10

Hi,
[#36930] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4613] define_method lacks trace events — Koichi Sasada <redmine@...> 2011/06/10

[#37495] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4613][Assigned] define_method lacks trace events — Hiroshi NAKAMURA <nakahiro@...> 2011/06/26

[#37689] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4613][Closed] define_method lacks trace events — Koichi Sasada <redmine@...> 2011/06/30

[#35895] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4614][Open] [RFC/PATCH] thread_pthread.c: lower RUBY_STACK_MIN_LIMIT to 64K — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>

10 messages 2011/04/25
[#50124] [ruby-trunk - Feature #4614] [RFC/PATCH] thread_pthread.c: lower RUBY_STACK_MIN_LIMIT to 64K — "ko1 (Koichi Sasada)" <redmine@...> 2012/11/26

[#36931] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4614] [RFC/PATCH] thread_pthread.c: lower RUBY_STACK_MIN_LIMIT to 64K — Koichi Sasada <redmine@...> 2011/06/10

[#36997] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4614] [RFC/PATCH] thread_pthread.c: lower RUBY_STACK_MIN_LIMIT to 64K — Eric Wong <normalperson@...> 2011/06/11

Koichi Sasada <[email protected]> wrote:
[#48352] [ruby-trunk - Feature #4614][Feedback] [RFC/PATCH] thread_pthread.c: lower RUBY_STACK_MIN_LIMIT to 64K — "ko1 (Koichi Sasada)" <redmine@...> 2012/10/26

[#48419] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #4614][Feedback] [RFC/PATCH] thread_pthread.c: lower RUBY_STACK_MIN_LIMIT to 64K — Eric Wong <normalperson@...> 2012/10/27

"ko1 (Koichi Sasada)" <[email protected]> wrote:
[#49936] [ruby-trunk - Feature #4614] [RFC/PATCH] thread_pthread.c: lower RUBY_STACK_MIN_LIMIT to 64K — "mame (Yusuke Endoh)" <mame@...> 2012/11/24

[#50990] [ruby-trunk - Feature #4614] [RFC/PATCH] thread_pthread.c: lower RUBY_STACK_MIN_LIMIT to 64K — "ko1 (Koichi Sasada)" <redmine@...> 2012/12/19

[#51169] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #4614] [RFC/PATCH] thread_pthread.c: lower RUBY_STACK_MIN_LIMIT to 64K — Eric Wong <normalperson@...> 2012/12/28

"ko1 (Koichi Sasada)" <[email protected]> wrote:
[#52187] [ruby-trunk - Feature #4614][Closed] [RFC/PATCH] thread_pthread.c: lower RUBY_STACK_MIN_LIMIT to 64K — "ko1 (Koichi Sasada)" <redmine@...> 2013/02/13

[#35896] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4615][Open] Add IO#split and iterative form of String#split — Joey Zhou <yimutang@...>

8 messages 2011/04/26
[#35898] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4615][Assigned] Add IO#split and iterative form of String#split — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2011/04/26

[#35901] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4615] Add IO#split and iterative form of String#split — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2011/04/26

[#35918] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4615] Add IO#split and iterative form of String#split — Joey Zhou <yimutang@...> 2011/04/27

[#35919] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4615] Add IO#split and iterative form of String#split — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2011/04/27

[#35929] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4615][Rejected] Add IO#split and iterative form of String#split — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2011/04/27

[#35930] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4615] Add IO#split and iterative form of String#split — Joey Zhou <yimutang@...> 2011/04/27

[#35931] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4615] Add IO#split and iterative form of String#split — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2011/04/27

[#35897] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4491] Some methods of Dir/File do not encode dirname/filename transparently — Joey Zhou <yimutang@...>

1 message 2011/04/26

[#35899] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4368] MiniTest::Assertions#assert_block ignores the given message. — Deryl Doucette <redmine@...>

1 message 2011/04/26

[#35900] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4368] MiniTest::Assertions#assert_block ignores the given message. — Deryl Doucette <redmine@...>

1 message 2011/04/26

[#35902] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4491][Assigned] Some methods of Dir/File do not encode dirname/filename transparently — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...>

1 message 2011/04/26

[#35909] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4617][Open] incorrect RbConfig::CONFIG["STRIP"] values — Jon Forums <redmine@...>

2 messages 2011/04/26
[#35932] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4617] incorrect RbConfig::CONFIG["STRIP"] values — Jon Forums <redmine@...> 2011/04/27

[#35910] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4266] Timeouts in threads cause "ThreadError: deadlock; recursive locking" — Brian Gugliemetti <briangug@...>

1 message 2011/04/26

[#35913] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4618][Open] Encoding::ConverterNotFoundErrors on trunk (Windows mingw) — Jon Forums <redmine@...>

3 messages 2011/04/26
[#35939] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4618][Assigned] Encoding::ConverterNotFoundErrors on trunk (Windows mingw) — Usaku NAKAMURA <redmine@...> 2011/04/28

[#35973] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4618] Encoding::ConverterNotFoundErrors on trunk (Windows mingw) — Jon Forums <redmine@...> 2011/05/02

[#35915] license change? — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>

We changed to BSD + ruby for 1.9.2, or was it for 1.9.3?

2 messages 2011/04/27
[#35917] Re: license change? — "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...> 2011/04/27

2011/4/27 Ryan Davis <[email protected]>:

[#35916] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #2032] Change the license to "GPLv2+ or Ruby's original". — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...>

1 message 2011/04/27

[#35921] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #2032] Change the license to "GPLv2+ or Ruby's original". — Charles Nutter <headius@...>

1 message 2011/04/27

[#35922] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #2032] Change the license to "GPLv2+ or Ruby's original". — Charles Nutter <headius@...>

1 message 2011/04/27

[#35923] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4621][Open] NilClass#to_hash — Tsuyoshi Sawada <sawadatsuyoshi@...>

4 messages 2011/04/27
[#35924] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4621][Assigned] NilClass#to_hash — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2011/04/27

[#35925] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4621][Assigned] NilClass#to_hash — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2011/04/27

Hi,
[#35926] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4621][Rejected] NilClass#to_hash — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2011/04/27

[#35933] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4623][Open] Consistent crash related to action_mailer — Alex Neth <alex@...>

7 messages 2011/04/27
[#35945] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4623] Consistent crash related to action_mailer — Alex Neth <alex@...> 2011/04/29

[#37002] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4623] Consistent crash related to action_mailer — Koichi Sasada <redmine@...> 2011/06/11

[#37037] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4623] Consistent crash related to action_mailer — Aaron Patterson <aaron@...> 2011/06/11

On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 04:30:37PM +0900, Koichi Sasada wrote:
[#37485] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4623][Assigned] Consistent crash related to action_mailer — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2011/06/26

[#37496] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4623][Feedback] Consistent crash related to action_mailer — Hiroshi NAKAMURA <nakahiro@...> 2011/06/26

[#51679] [ruby-trunk - Bug #4623][Rejected] Consistent crash related to action_mailer — "drbrain (Eric Hodel)" <[email protected]> 2013/01/25

[#35934] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #3840] Ruby 1.9.2p0 crashes using Rails 3.0 on repeated browser refresh — Hiroshi Shirosaki <h.shirosaki@...>

1 message 2011/04/28

[#35935] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #3840] Ruby 1.9.2p0 crashes using Rails 3.0 on repeated browser refresh — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...>

1 message 2011/04/28

[#35936] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4491] Some methods of Dir/File do not encode dirname/filename transparently — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...>

1 message 2011/04/28

[#35938] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4491] Some methods of Dir/File do not encode dirname/filename transparently — Usaku NAKAMURA <redmine@...>

1 message 2011/04/28

[#35940] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4630][Open] PROCDEBUG to non-zero values causes segmentation faults in check_env in trunk — Elise Huard <ruby@...>

6 messages 2011/04/28
[#50125] [ruby-trunk - Bug #4630] PROCDEBUG to non-zero values causes segmentation faults in check_env in trunk — "ko1 (Koichi Sasada)" <redmine@...> 2012/11/26

[#36933] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4630][Open] PROCDEBUG to non-zero values causes segmentation faults in check_env in trunk — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...> 2011/06/10

Hi,
[#37006] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4630][Assigned] PROCDEBUG to non-zero values causes segmentation faults in check_env in trunk — Koichi Sasada <redmine@...> 2011/06/11

[#37497] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4630] PROCDEBUG to non-zero values causes segmentation faults in check_env in trunk — Hiroshi NAKAMURA <nakahiro@...> 2011/06/26

[#79349] [Ruby trunk Bug#4630][Closed] PROCDEBUG to non-zero values causes segmentation faults in check_env in trunk — ko1@... 2017/01/31

Issue #4630 has been updated by Koichi Sasada.

[#35942] change in timeout error — Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@...>

Hello. Sorry if this is a repeat...

4 messages 2011/04/29
[#35957] Re: change in timeout error — Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...> 2011/04/30

On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 7:05 PM, Roger Pack <[email protected]> wrote:
[#36944] Re: change in timeout error — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...> 2011/06/10

Hi,
[#36954] Re: change in timeout error — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2011/06/11

Hi,

[#35943] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #3905] rb_clear_cache_by_class() called often during GC for non-blocking I/O — Motohiro KOSAKI <kosaki.motohiro@...>

3 messages 2011/04/29
[#35952] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #3905] rb_clear_cache_by_class() called often during GC for non-blocking I/O — Eric Wong <normalperson@...> 2011/04/29

Motohiro KOSAKI <[email protected]> wrote:
[#36091] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #3905] rb_clear_cache_by_class() called often during GC for non-blocking I/O — Eric Wong <normalperson@...> 2011/05/10

Eric Wong <[email protected]> wrote:

[#35944] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4289] Timeouts in threads cause SEGV — Motohiro KOSAKI <kosaki.motohiro@...>

1 message 2011/04/29

[#35946] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4632][Open] Regexp instance method | for creating Regexp.unions — Jan Lelis <mail@...>

4 messages 2011/04/29
[#35950] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4632][Rejected] Regexp instance method | for creating Regexp.unions — Shyouhei Urabe <shyouhei@...> 2011/04/29

[#35951] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4632] Regexp instance method | for creating Regexp.unions — Jan Lelis <mail@...> 2011/04/29

[#35948] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4632][Open] Regexp instance method | for creating Regexp.unions — "Haase, Konstantin" <Konstantin.Haase@...> 2011/04/29

I like it for Regexp, but a string method would violate the POLS, imho.

[#35947] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4633][Open] iterate method / extended version of for — Jan Lelis <mail@...>

3 messages 2011/04/29
[#43623] [ruby-trunk - Feature #4633][Assigned] iterate method / extended version of for — "mame (Yusuke Endoh)" <mame@...> 2012/03/25

[#46191] [ruby-trunk - Feature #4633][Rejected] iterate method / extended version of for — "tarui (Masaya Tarui)" <tarui@...> 2012/07/05

[#35949] [Backport92 - Backport #4634][Open] Segmentation fault on marshal_dump — Anton Sozontov <a.sozontov@...>

3 messages 2011/04/29
[#35967] [Backport92 - Backport #4634] Segmentation fault on marshal_dump — Tomoyuki Chikanaga <nagachika00@...> 2011/05/01

[#36605] [Backport92 - Backport #4634][Rejected] Segmentation fault on marshal_dump — Yuki Sonoda <yugui@...> 2011/05/31

[#35953] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #2190]FileUtils::chmod - allow symbolic mode — ted cooper <anthezium@...>

1 message 2011/04/29

[#35955] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #2190][Assigned]FileUtils::chmod - allow symbolic mode — Motohiro KOSAKI <kosaki.motohiro@...>

1 message 2011/04/29

[ruby-core:35714] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4553] Add Set#pick and Set#pop

From: redmine@...
Date: 2011-04-12 00:05:37 UTC
List: ruby-core #35714 
Issue #4553 has been updated by Michael Edgar.


The ruby-core e-mail I sent appeared to not attach to the issue on Redmine. I apologize for the noise.

-----------------------------------------------------------

The existence of `Set#first` is an artifact of Set including Enumerable and the very idea of "first" on a Set is an odd notion. A set by itself does not have ordering. I have implemented it to pick the first element because it is simplest, but someone calling "pick" on a set does not care which element it is. If one would prefer implementing it as an alias to first, I'd be fine with that.

On a personal note to emphasize why I find this issue compelling: one reason I enjoy using Ruby because often my code reads just as I would describe it to a colleague - reading "element = set.first" is not something many would agree is a sensible way to describe the act of picking an arbitrary element from a mathematical set.

Yes, one could implement #pop with #delete and #first, which again relies on a notion of ordering in a set. One can implement #proper_subset with #subset and a comparison, as can one implement #proper_superset with #superset and a comparison. Yet they are in the Set class because they are fundamental operations. #add? and #delete? can also be implemented with #add and #include?/#delete and #include? respectively, yet they are included in the Set class because they are useful and common operations on a set.

If `pop` is too close the Array method of the same name, I understand the confusion, but I don't get why picking first/last makes a difference. Anyone asking to remove an arbitrary element from a Set surely doesn't care where it lies in an underlying hash table. I am surprised one would argue that the Set class rarely needs the notion of selecting an element from it. Rarely am I presented with an algorithm using sets that does not require simply getting an element or picking one out of a set.

----------------------------------------
Feature #4553: Add Set#pick and Set#pop
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/4553

Author: Michael Edgar
Status: Open
Priority: Low
Assignee: 
Category: 
Target version: 


A very common operation on sets is to take an arbitrary element from them at O(1) cost. I know typically
it's suggested that library additions go out as a gem to see community review. However, to me it seems
to be a glaring omission to lack such an operation on a built-in, fundamental data structure, so I've
gone straight to the bug tracker.

I wasn't too sure which method names to use as I've often heard "take" in lieu of "pop," so I just used the
names Wikipedia uses. Consider them flexible. "Pick" selects an arbitrary element, and "pop" selects and
deletes it.

I've provided a very simple patch that implements the necessary behavior. Thoughts?


-- 
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org

In This Thread

Prev Next