[#35599] Proc#== behaviour on 1.8.7 and 1.9.2 — Adam Prescott <adam@...>
I've encountered a problem when using Proc#== (with both lambdas and
5 messages
2011/04/01
[#35613] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4539][Assigned] Array#zip_with — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...>
11 messages
2011/04/05
[#35617] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4539][Assigned] Array#zip_with
— Benoit Daloze <eregontp@...>
2011/04/05
> http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/4539
[#35673] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4539][Assigned] Array#zip_with
— Kenta Murata <muraken@...>
2011/04/09
Hi,
[#35618] Redmine issues — Benoit Daloze <eregontp@...>
Hello,
6 messages
2011/04/05
[#35621] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4555][Open] [PATCH] ext/socket/init.c: rsock_connect retries on interrupt — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
7 messages
2011/04/05
[#35708] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4555] [PATCH] ext/socket/init.c: rsock_connect retries on interrupt
— redmine@...
2011/04/11
[#35629] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4473] Calling return within begin still executes else — Mayank Kohaley <redmine@...>
4 messages
2011/04/06
[#35631] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4558][Open] TestSocket#test_closed_read fails after r31230 — Tomoyuki Chikanaga <redmine@...>
23 messages
2011/04/06
[#35641] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4558][Open] TestSocket#test_closed_read fails after r31230
— KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...>
2011/04/07
> ----------------------------------------
[#35647] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4558][Open] TestSocket#test_closed_read fails after r31230
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2011/04/07
KOSAKI Motohiro <[email protected]> wrote:
[#35665] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4558] TestSocket#test_closed_read fails after r31230
— Tomoyuki Chikanaga <redmine@...>
2011/04/09
[#35669] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4558] TestSocket#test_closed_read fails after r31230
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2011/04/09
Tomoyuki Chikanaga <[email protected]> wrote:
[#35715] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4558][Assigned] TestSocket#test_closed_read fails after r31230
— redmine@...
2011/04/12
[#35716] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4558] TestSocket#test_closed_read fails after r31230
— redmine@...
2011/04/12
[#35726] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4558] TestSocket#test_closed_read fails after r31230
— KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...>
2011/04/12
> Issue #4558 has been updated by Eric Wong.
[#35746] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4558] TestSocket#test_closed_read fails after r31230
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2011/04/13
KOSAKI Motohiro <[email protected]> wrote:
[#35632] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4559][Open] Proc#== does not match the documented behaviour — Adam Prescott <redmine@...>
13 messages
2011/04/06
[#50251] [ruby-trunk - Bug #4559] Proc#== does not match the documented behaviour
— "matz (Yukihiro Matsumoto)" <matz@...>
2012/11/28
[#50252] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #4559] Proc#== does not match the documented behaviour
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2012/11/28
(2012/11/28 16:10), matz (Yukihiro Matsumoto) wrote:
[#50505] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #4559] Proc#== does not match the documented behaviour
— Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...>
2012/12/03
I believe this will be a spec change, albeit a small one. Can we
[#35636] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4560][Open] [PATCH] lib/net/protocol.rb: avoid exceptions in rbuf_fill — Eric Wong <redmine@...>
6 messages
2011/04/07
[#35637] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4561][Open] 1.9.2 requires parentheses around argument of method call in an array, where 1.8.7 did not — Dave Schweisguth <redmine@...>
9 messages
2011/04/07
[#35644] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #4563][Open] Dir#tell broken — Daniel Berger <redmine@...>
6 messages
2011/04/07
[#35648] mvm branch status? — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
Hello, I noticed the "mvm" branch in SVN hasn't been updated in over a year.
10 messages
2011/04/07
[#35649] Re: mvm branch status?
— Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...>
2011/04/07
Hi Eric.
[#35650] Re: mvm branch status?
— Evan Phoenix <evan@...>
2011/04/07
Has there been any thought on solving the C extension problem in MVM? In the present state, I've stopped working on it in Rubinius because there is no workable solution if there are C extensions in the mix.
[#35652] Re: mvm branch status?
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2011/04/07
Evan Phoenix <[email protected]> wrote:
[#35691] Re: mvm branch status?
— Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...>
2011/04/10
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 6:18 PM, Eric Wong <[email protected]> wrote:
[#35666] caching of the ancestor chain — Xavier Noria <fxn@...>
Why does Ruby cache the ancestors chain? I mean, not why the implementation i=
9 messages
2011/04/09
[#35667] Re: caching of the ancestor chain
— Xavier Noria <fxn@...>
2011/04/09
Ah, in case it is not clear, where I find the metaphor broken is in that you=
[#35668] Re: caching of the ancestor chain
— Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
2011/04/09
Hi,
[#35692] Re: caching of the ancestor chain
— Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...>
2011/04/10
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 7:56 PM, Yukihiro Matsumoto <[email protected]> wro=
[#35678] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4564][Open] mingw-w64, truncate, ftruncate and ftello -- properly evalute it's existence — Luis Lavena <redmine@...>
8 messages
2011/04/09
[#35699] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4568][Open] [PATCH] file.c (rb_group_member): kill 256K of stack usage — redmine@...
4 messages
2011/04/11
[#35707] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4569][Open] Replace IPAddr with IPAddress — redmine@...
13 messages
2011/04/11
[#35713] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4571][Open] YAML.load given an ISO8601 timestamp creates an incorrect value for usec — redmine@...
5 messages
2011/04/11
[#35734] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4574][Open] Numeric#within — redmine@...
16 messages
2011/04/13
[#35753] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576][Open] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number — redmine@...
61 messages
2011/04/14
[#39198] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number
— Vit Ondruch <v.ondruch@...>
2011/08/30
[#39508] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number
— V咜 Ondruch <v.ondruch@...>
2011/09/13
Can somebody please reopen this issue? Since the test suite fix is
[#39510] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number
— Vit Ondruch <v.ondruch@...>
2011/09/13
[#39566] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number
— Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core@...>
2011/09/15
[#39582] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number
— Tanaka Akira <akr@...>
2011/09/16
2011/9/16 Marc-Andre Lafortune <[email protected]>:
[#39584] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number
— Michal Suchanek <hramrach@...>
2011/09/16
On 16 September 2011 15:49, Tanaka Akira <[email protected]> wrote:
[#39567] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number
— Kenta Murata <muraken@...>
2011/09/16
Hi,
[#39569] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number
— "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...>
2011/09/16
2011/9/16 Kenta Murata <[email protected]>:
[#39590] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number
— Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core@...>
2011/09/16
[#39593] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number
— Tanaka Akira <akr@...>
2011/09/16
2011/9/17 Marc-Andre Lafortune <[email protected]>:
[#39595] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number
— Tanaka Akira <akr@...>
2011/09/17
2011/9/17 Tanaka Akira <[email protected]>:
[#39604] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number
— "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...>
2011/09/17
(2011/09/17 9:07), Tanaka Akira wrote:
[#39608] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number
— Masahiro TANAKA <masa16.tanaka@...>
2011/09/17
I have not been watching ruby-core, but let me give a comment for this issu=
[#39637] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number
— Tanaka Akira <akr@...>
2011/09/20
2011/9/17 Masahiro TANAKA <[email protected]>:
[#39655] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number
— Masahiro TANAKA <masa16.tanaka@...>
2011/09/21
2011/9/20 Tanaka Akira <[email protected]>:
[#39656] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number
— masa <masa16.tanaka@...>
2011/09/21
I haven't explained the reason of the error estimation in
[#39657] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number
— Michal Suchanek <hramrach@...>
2011/09/21
On 21 September 2011 14:25, masa <[email protected]> wrote:
[#35754] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4577][Open] (int...float).max should not raise an error — redmine@...
8 messages
2011/04/14
[#35759] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #4578][Open] Fixnum.freeze not frozen? — redmine@...
6 messages
2011/04/14
[#35765] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4579][Open] SecureRandom + OpenSSL may repeat with fork — redmine@...
27 messages
2011/04/15
[#35769] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4579] SecureRandom + OpenSSL may repeat with fork
— redmine@...
2011/04/15
[#35771] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4579] SecureRandom + OpenSSL may repeat with fork
— redmine@...
2011/04/15
[#35773] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4579] SecureRandom + OpenSSL may repeat with fork
— redmine@...
2011/04/15
[#35774] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4579] SecureRandom + OpenSSL may repeat with fork
— redmine@...
2011/04/15
[#35779] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4579] SecureRandom + OpenSSL may repeat with fork
— redmine@...
2011/04/15
[#35780] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4579] SecureRandom + OpenSSL may repeat with fork
— redmine@...
2011/04/15
[#35822] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4579] SecureRandom + OpenSSL may repeat with fork
— redmine@...
2011/04/20
[#35777] hashes are not consistent across ruby processes? — Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@...>
Hello all.
5 messages
2011/04/15
[#35813] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4320] Bus Error in digest/sha2 on sparc — redmine@...
1 message
2011/04/19
[#35814] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4320] Bus Error in digest/sha2 on sparc — redmine@...
1 message
2011/04/19
[#35825] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #4587][Open] RMATCH_REGS definition is wrong — redmine@...
4 messages
2011/04/20
[#35828] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4589][Open] add Queue#each() method and include Enumerable — redmine@...
10 messages
2011/04/20
[#35830] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #3436] Spawn the timer thread lazily — redmine@...
1 message
2011/04/20
[#35850] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4189] FileUtils#ln_r — Sakuro OZAWA <redmine@...>
1 message
2011/04/22
[#35866] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4603][Open] lib/csv.rb: when the :encoding parameter is not provided, the encoding of CSV data is treated as ASCII-8BIT — yu nobuoka <nobuoka@...>
13 messages
2011/04/24
[#35873] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4603][Open] lib/csv.rb: when the :encoding parameter is not provided, the encoding of CSV data is treated as ASCII-8BIT
— James Gray <james@...>
2011/04/25
On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 1:33 AM, yu nobuoka <[email protected]>wrote:
[#35875] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4603][Open] lib/csv.rb: when the :encoding parameter is not provided, the encoding of CSV data is treated as ASCII-8BIT
— "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...>
2011/04/25
2011/4/25 James Gray <[email protected]>:
[#35878] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4603][Open] lib/csv.rb: when the :encoding parameter is not provided, the encoding of CSV data is treated as ASCII-8BIT
— James Gray <james@...>
2011/04/25
On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 11:29 PM, NARUSE, Yui <[email protected]> wrote:
[#35879] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4610][Open] Proc#curry behavior is inconsistent with lambdas containing default argument values — Joshua Ballanco <jballanc@...>
11 messages
2011/04/25
[#35892] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4610] Proc#curry behavior is inconsistent with lambdas containing default argument values
— Joshua Ballanco <jballanc@...>
2011/04/25
[#35883] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4611][Open] [BUG] Segementation fault reported — Deryl Doucette <me@...>
15 messages
2011/04/25
[#35895] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4614][Open] [RFC/PATCH] thread_pthread.c: lower RUBY_STACK_MIN_LIMIT to 64K — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
10 messages
2011/04/25
[#35923] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4621][Open] NilClass#to_hash — Tsuyoshi Sawada <sawadatsuyoshi@...>
4 messages
2011/04/27
[#35933] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4623][Open] Consistent crash related to action_mailer — Alex Neth <alex@...>
7 messages
2011/04/27
[#35943] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #3905] rb_clear_cache_by_class() called often during GC for non-blocking I/O — Motohiro KOSAKI <kosaki.motohiro@...>
3 messages
2011/04/29
[ruby-core:35934] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #3840] Ruby 1.9.2p0 crashes using Rails 3.0 on repeated browser refresh
From:
Hiroshi Shirosaki <h.shirosaki@...>
Date:
2011-04-28 01:55:41 UTC
List:
ruby-core #35934
Issue #3840 has been updated by Hiroshi Shirosaki.
Simpler version tests look good.
I tried, but Ruby didn't crash.
I am using Windows XP with Ruby 1.9.2-p180.
Modifying threads join, Ruby crashes with my environment.
path = "test.txt"
file = File.open(path, "w")
read_file = File.open(path, "r")
threads = []
1000.times do |i|
threads << Thread.new { file.print(i) }
threads << Thread.new { read_file.read }
end
threads.each { |t| t.join }
file.close
read_file.close
----------------------------------------
Bug #3840: Ruby 1.9.2p0 crashes using Rails 3.0 on repeated browser refresh
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/3840
Author: Sean O'Neil
Status: Open
Priority: Normal
Assignee:
Category:
Target version:
ruby -v: ruby 1.9.2p0 (2010-08-18 revision 29036) [i386-mswin32_90]
I'm not certain whether this is a Ruby issue or a Rails issue (or a bit of both). The problem is intermittent, and it appears to be a threading issue surrounding the reading of the Rails log file. It is fairly easy for me to reproduce the problem:
1) Install a clean 1.9.2p0 and run "gem install rails" to get Rails 3.0.
2) Use the Rails 3.0 generator script to create an empty project.
3) Launch the web app using default options.
4) Point a browser to the home page for the new Rails app, and keep pressing F5 (or Refresh) at varying speeds until Ruby crashes. It seems to happen most often if I hold F5 for a few seconds and then release for a few seconds, varying how long I hold and release it.
It crashes eventually no matter how I run it, but it seems to crash more often in production mode (which logs a bunch of errors using the default generated app). The crash appears to be dependent on timing, but I can usually make it crash in less than 60 seconds.
I'm currently using Windows 7 (x64) and compiling Ruby with Visual Studio 2008. However, the crash also occurs with the pre-packaged RubyInstaller for Windows. Given the debug information I've provided below, it does not appear to be platform-specific, but a different OS can have different IO and thread timing issues, so it may be harder to reproduce on other platforms.
I rebuilt Ruby with debugging options and got this call stack when it crashed:
rb_econv_convert() in transcode.c line 1449 (the ec parameter was set to NULL)
fill_cbuf() in io.c line 1691
read_all() in io.c line 1755
io_read() in io.c line 2163
I added some additional checks to the code to find out how fptr->readconv was getting cleared inside fill_cbuf(), and I traced it to io_fillbuf() and then rb_read_internal(). Now, rb_read_internal() does not have a pointer to fptr or any of its members. It could be a buffer overrun, but the buffer is much larger than the file, and the changes seem much too clean for that. In addition to readconv being cleared, other struct members are being reset to an earlier state (not necessarily back to 0), which seems to imply that another thread is accessing the same IO object while the current thread is inside rb_read_internal(). I can't "catch it in the act" because setting breakpoints affects the timing, and it typically requires hundreds of passes through this code to break. However, I can copy the struct fptr is pointing to and have it break as soon as those members change. The info being read right before the IO object is reset is:
rbuf 0x05700408 "
Started GET "/javascripts/dragdrop.js?1283353508" for 127.0.0.1 at 2010-09-08 16:22:14 -0400
ActionController::RoutingError (No route matches "/javascripts/dragdrop.js"):
Rendered d:/Projects/NetAuditor/v3.00/Code/Build/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/actionpack-3.0.0/lib/action_dispatch/middleware/templates/rescues/routing_error.erb within rescues/layout (2.0ms)
"
I can eliminate this crash by changing the Ruby source to check for NULL before referencing the pointer. However, it may only hide the issue, which may come back to bite me later. So, does this sound like a problem that needs to be fixed in the Ruby code, or a thread-safety issue in Rails?
Thank you,
Sean O'Neil
--
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org