[#35599] Proc#== behaviour on 1.8.7 and 1.9.2 — Adam Prescott <adam@...>
I've encountered a problem when using Proc#== (with both lambdas and
5 messages
2011/04/01
[#35613] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4539][Assigned] Array#zip_with — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...>
11 messages
2011/04/05
[#35617] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4539][Assigned] Array#zip_with
— Benoit Daloze <eregontp@...>
2011/04/05
> http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/4539
[#35673] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4539][Assigned] Array#zip_with
— Kenta Murata <muraken@...>
2011/04/09
Hi,
[#35618] Redmine issues — Benoit Daloze <eregontp@...>
Hello,
6 messages
2011/04/05
[#35621] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4555][Open] [PATCH] ext/socket/init.c: rsock_connect retries on interrupt — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
7 messages
2011/04/05
[#35708] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4555] [PATCH] ext/socket/init.c: rsock_connect retries on interrupt
— redmine@...
2011/04/11
[#35629] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4473] Calling return within begin still executes else — Mayank Kohaley <redmine@...>
4 messages
2011/04/06
[#35631] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4558][Open] TestSocket#test_closed_read fails after r31230 — Tomoyuki Chikanaga <redmine@...>
23 messages
2011/04/06
[#35641] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4558][Open] TestSocket#test_closed_read fails after r31230
— KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...>
2011/04/07
> ----------------------------------------
[#35647] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4558][Open] TestSocket#test_closed_read fails after r31230
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2011/04/07
KOSAKI Motohiro <[email protected]> wrote:
[#35665] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4558] TestSocket#test_closed_read fails after r31230
— Tomoyuki Chikanaga <redmine@...>
2011/04/09
[#35669] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4558] TestSocket#test_closed_read fails after r31230
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2011/04/09
Tomoyuki Chikanaga <[email protected]> wrote:
[#35715] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4558][Assigned] TestSocket#test_closed_read fails after r31230
— redmine@...
2011/04/12
[#35716] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4558] TestSocket#test_closed_read fails after r31230
— redmine@...
2011/04/12
[#35726] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4558] TestSocket#test_closed_read fails after r31230
— KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...>
2011/04/12
> Issue #4558 has been updated by Eric Wong.
[#35746] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4558] TestSocket#test_closed_read fails after r31230
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2011/04/13
KOSAKI Motohiro <[email protected]> wrote:
[#35632] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4559][Open] Proc#== does not match the documented behaviour — Adam Prescott <redmine@...>
13 messages
2011/04/06
[#50251] [ruby-trunk - Bug #4559] Proc#== does not match the documented behaviour
— "matz (Yukihiro Matsumoto)" <matz@...>
2012/11/28
[#50252] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #4559] Proc#== does not match the documented behaviour
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2012/11/28
(2012/11/28 16:10), matz (Yukihiro Matsumoto) wrote:
[#50505] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #4559] Proc#== does not match the documented behaviour
— Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...>
2012/12/03
I believe this will be a spec change, albeit a small one. Can we
[#35636] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4560][Open] [PATCH] lib/net/protocol.rb: avoid exceptions in rbuf_fill — Eric Wong <redmine@...>
6 messages
2011/04/07
[#35637] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4561][Open] 1.9.2 requires parentheses around argument of method call in an array, where 1.8.7 did not — Dave Schweisguth <redmine@...>
9 messages
2011/04/07
[#35644] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #4563][Open] Dir#tell broken — Daniel Berger <redmine@...>
6 messages
2011/04/07
[#35648] mvm branch status? — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
Hello, I noticed the "mvm" branch in SVN hasn't been updated in over a year.
10 messages
2011/04/07
[#35649] Re: mvm branch status?
— Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...>
2011/04/07
Hi Eric.
[#35650] Re: mvm branch status?
— Evan Phoenix <evan@...>
2011/04/07
Has there been any thought on solving the C extension problem in MVM? In the present state, I've stopped working on it in Rubinius because there is no workable solution if there are C extensions in the mix.
[#35652] Re: mvm branch status?
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2011/04/07
Evan Phoenix <[email protected]> wrote:
[#35691] Re: mvm branch status?
— Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...>
2011/04/10
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 6:18 PM, Eric Wong <[email protected]> wrote:
[#35666] caching of the ancestor chain — Xavier Noria <fxn@...>
Why does Ruby cache the ancestors chain? I mean, not why the implementation i=
9 messages
2011/04/09
[#35667] Re: caching of the ancestor chain
— Xavier Noria <fxn@...>
2011/04/09
Ah, in case it is not clear, where I find the metaphor broken is in that you=
[#35668] Re: caching of the ancestor chain
— Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
2011/04/09
Hi,
[#35692] Re: caching of the ancestor chain
— Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...>
2011/04/10
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 7:56 PM, Yukihiro Matsumoto <[email protected]> wro=
[#35678] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4564][Open] mingw-w64, truncate, ftruncate and ftello -- properly evalute it's existence — Luis Lavena <redmine@...>
8 messages
2011/04/09
[#35699] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4568][Open] [PATCH] file.c (rb_group_member): kill 256K of stack usage — redmine@...
4 messages
2011/04/11
[#35707] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4569][Open] Replace IPAddr with IPAddress — redmine@...
13 messages
2011/04/11
[#35713] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4571][Open] YAML.load given an ISO8601 timestamp creates an incorrect value for usec — redmine@...
5 messages
2011/04/11
[#35734] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4574][Open] Numeric#within — redmine@...
16 messages
2011/04/13
[#35753] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576][Open] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number — redmine@...
61 messages
2011/04/14
[#39198] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number
— Vit Ondruch <v.ondruch@...>
2011/08/30
[#39508] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number
— V咜 Ondruch <v.ondruch@...>
2011/09/13
Can somebody please reopen this issue? Since the test suite fix is
[#39510] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number
— Vit Ondruch <v.ondruch@...>
2011/09/13
[#39566] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number
— Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core@...>
2011/09/15
[#39582] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number
— Tanaka Akira <akr@...>
2011/09/16
2011/9/16 Marc-Andre Lafortune <[email protected]>:
[#39584] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number
— Michal Suchanek <hramrach@...>
2011/09/16
On 16 September 2011 15:49, Tanaka Akira <[email protected]> wrote:
[#39567] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number
— Kenta Murata <muraken@...>
2011/09/16
Hi,
[#39569] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number
— "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...>
2011/09/16
2011/9/16 Kenta Murata <[email protected]>:
[#39590] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number
— Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core@...>
2011/09/16
[#39593] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number
— Tanaka Akira <akr@...>
2011/09/16
2011/9/17 Marc-Andre Lafortune <[email protected]>:
[#39595] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number
— Tanaka Akira <akr@...>
2011/09/17
2011/9/17 Tanaka Akira <[email protected]>:
[#39604] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number
— "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...>
2011/09/17
(2011/09/17 9:07), Tanaka Akira wrote:
[#39608] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number
— Masahiro TANAKA <masa16.tanaka@...>
2011/09/17
I have not been watching ruby-core, but let me give a comment for this issu=
[#39637] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number
— Tanaka Akira <akr@...>
2011/09/20
2011/9/17 Masahiro TANAKA <[email protected]>:
[#39655] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number
— Masahiro TANAKA <masa16.tanaka@...>
2011/09/21
2011/9/20 Tanaka Akira <[email protected]>:
[#39656] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number
— masa <masa16.tanaka@...>
2011/09/21
I haven't explained the reason of the error estimation in
[#39657] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number
— Michal Suchanek <hramrach@...>
2011/09/21
On 21 September 2011 14:25, masa <[email protected]> wrote:
[#35754] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4577][Open] (int...float).max should not raise an error — redmine@...
8 messages
2011/04/14
[#35759] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #4578][Open] Fixnum.freeze not frozen? — redmine@...
6 messages
2011/04/14
[#35765] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4579][Open] SecureRandom + OpenSSL may repeat with fork — redmine@...
27 messages
2011/04/15
[#35769] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4579] SecureRandom + OpenSSL may repeat with fork
— redmine@...
2011/04/15
[#35771] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4579] SecureRandom + OpenSSL may repeat with fork
— redmine@...
2011/04/15
[#35773] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4579] SecureRandom + OpenSSL may repeat with fork
— redmine@...
2011/04/15
[#35774] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4579] SecureRandom + OpenSSL may repeat with fork
— redmine@...
2011/04/15
[#35779] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4579] SecureRandom + OpenSSL may repeat with fork
— redmine@...
2011/04/15
[#35780] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4579] SecureRandom + OpenSSL may repeat with fork
— redmine@...
2011/04/15
[#35822] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4579] SecureRandom + OpenSSL may repeat with fork
— redmine@...
2011/04/20
[#35777] hashes are not consistent across ruby processes? — Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@...>
Hello all.
5 messages
2011/04/15
[#35813] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4320] Bus Error in digest/sha2 on sparc — redmine@...
1 message
2011/04/19
[#35814] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4320] Bus Error in digest/sha2 on sparc — redmine@...
1 message
2011/04/19
[#35825] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #4587][Open] RMATCH_REGS definition is wrong — redmine@...
4 messages
2011/04/20
[#35828] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4589][Open] add Queue#each() method and include Enumerable — redmine@...
10 messages
2011/04/20
[#35830] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #3436] Spawn the timer thread lazily — redmine@...
1 message
2011/04/20
[#35850] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4189] FileUtils#ln_r — Sakuro OZAWA <redmine@...>
1 message
2011/04/22
[#35866] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4603][Open] lib/csv.rb: when the :encoding parameter is not provided, the encoding of CSV data is treated as ASCII-8BIT — yu nobuoka <nobuoka@...>
13 messages
2011/04/24
[#35873] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4603][Open] lib/csv.rb: when the :encoding parameter is not provided, the encoding of CSV data is treated as ASCII-8BIT
— James Gray <james@...>
2011/04/25
On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 1:33 AM, yu nobuoka <[email protected]>wrote:
[#35875] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4603][Open] lib/csv.rb: when the :encoding parameter is not provided, the encoding of CSV data is treated as ASCII-8BIT
— "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...>
2011/04/25
2011/4/25 James Gray <[email protected]>:
[#35878] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4603][Open] lib/csv.rb: when the :encoding parameter is not provided, the encoding of CSV data is treated as ASCII-8BIT
— James Gray <james@...>
2011/04/25
On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 11:29 PM, NARUSE, Yui <[email protected]> wrote:
[#35879] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4610][Open] Proc#curry behavior is inconsistent with lambdas containing default argument values — Joshua Ballanco <jballanc@...>
11 messages
2011/04/25
[#35892] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4610] Proc#curry behavior is inconsistent with lambdas containing default argument values
— Joshua Ballanco <jballanc@...>
2011/04/25
[#35883] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4611][Open] [BUG] Segementation fault reported — Deryl Doucette <me@...>
15 messages
2011/04/25
[#35895] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4614][Open] [RFC/PATCH] thread_pthread.c: lower RUBY_STACK_MIN_LIMIT to 64K — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
10 messages
2011/04/25
[#35923] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4621][Open] NilClass#to_hash — Tsuyoshi Sawada <sawadatsuyoshi@...>
4 messages
2011/04/27
[#35933] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4623][Open] Consistent crash related to action_mailer — Alex Neth <alex@...>
7 messages
2011/04/27
[#35943] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #3905] rb_clear_cache_by_class() called often during GC for non-blocking I/O — Motohiro KOSAKI <kosaki.motohiro@...>
3 messages
2011/04/29
[ruby-core:35857] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #3131] add Kernel#Hash() method like Kernel#Array()
From:
Suraj Kurapati <sunaku@...>
Date:
2011-04-22 23:52:12 UTC
List:
ruby-core #35857
Issue #3131 has been updated by Suraj Kurapati.
Integer() and Float() in Ruby 1.9.2 raise TypeError and ArgumentError:
$ irb
## ruby 1.9.2p180 (2011-02-18 revision 30909) [x86_64-linux]
>> Float(nil)
TypeError: can't convert nil into Float
from (irb):6:in `Float'
from (irb):6
from /usr/bin/irb:12:in `<main>'
>> Float('meow')
ArgumentError: invalid value for Float(): "meow"
from (irb):8:in `Float'
from (irb):8
from /usr/bin/irb:12:in `<main>'
I don't know which error type we should raise in Kernel#Hash().
----------------------------------------
Feature #3131: add Kernel#Hash() method like Kernel#Array()
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/3131
Author: Suraj Kurapati
Status: Assigned
Priority: Normal
Assignee: Yukihiro Matsumoto
Category: core
Target version: 1.9.x
Hello,
There is an imbalance of power in the Ruby core API (when it comes
to arrays and hashes) because it is easier to convert nil values
into empty arrays, thanks to Kernel#Array(), than it is to convert
nil values into empty hashes, due to lack of Kernel#Hash().
To correct this asymmetry and restore a balance of power, please
add a Kernel#Hash() method for converting nil, Array, and Hash
values into hashes:
module Kernel
def Hash(value)
if value.respond_to? :to_hash
value.to_hash
elsif value.respond_to? :to_ary
Hash[*value.to_ary]
elsif value.nil?
{}
else
raise ArgumentError, "invalid value for Hash: #{value}"
end
end
end
For example, here is how I would use the above API:
#-------------------------------------------------------------------------
# CASE 1: to_hash
#-------------------------------------------------------------------------
real_hash = {:real => true}
Hash(real_hash) # => {:real=>true}
fake_hash = Object.new
def fake_hash.to_hash
{:fake => true}
end
Hash(fake_hash) # => {:fake=>true}
#-------------------------------------------------------------------------
# CASE 2: to_ary
#-------------------------------------------------------------------------
real_array = [:real, true]
Hash(real_array) # => {:real=>true}
fake_array = Object.new
def fake_array.to_ary
[:fake, true]
end
Hash(fake_array) # => {:fake=>true}
#-------------------------------------------------------------------------
# CASE 3: nil
#-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hash(nil) # => {}
#-------------------------------------------------------------------------
# CASE 4: unsupported arguments
#-------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Hash(true)
ArgumentError: invalid value for Hash: true
from (irb):74:in `Hash'
from (irb):80
from /usr/bin/irb:12:in `<main>'
>> Hash(false)
ArgumentError: invalid value for Hash: false
from (irb):74:in `Hash'
from (irb):81
from /usr/bin/irb:12:in `<main>'
>> Hash(123)
ArgumentError: invalid value for Hash: 123
from (irb):74:in `Hash'
from (irb):82
from /usr/bin/irb:12:in `<main>'
Thanks for your consideration.
--
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org