[#99115] [Ruby master Bug#17023] How to prevent String memory to be relocated in ruby-ffi — larskanis@...
Issue #17023 has been reported by larskanis (Lars Kanis).
22 messages
2020/07/10
[#99375] [Ruby master Feature#17055] Allow suppressing uninitialized instance variable and method redefined verbose mode warnings — merch-redmine@...
Issue #17055 has been reported by jeremyevans0 (Jeremy Evans).
29 messages
2020/07/28
[#101207] [Ruby master Feature#17055] Allow suppressing uninitialized instance variable and method redefined verbose mode warnings
— merch-redmine@...
2020/12/02
Issue #17055 has been updated by jeremyevans0 (Jeremy Evans).
[#101231] Re: [Ruby master Feature#17055] Allow suppressing uninitialized instance variable and method redefined verbose mode warnings
— Austin Ziegler <halostatue@...>
2020/12/03
What does this mean?
[ruby-core:99402] [Ruby master Feature#9112] Make module lookup more dynamic (Including modules into a module after it has already been included)
From:
merch-redmine@...
Date:
2020-07-30 18:52:29 UTC
List:
ruby-core #99402
Issue #9112 has been updated by jeremyevans0 (Jeremy Evans). Status changed from Assigned to Closed Support for this was implemented in commit:3556a834a2847e52162d1d3302d4c64390df1694 and commit:41582d5866ae34c57094f70f95c3d31f4a1fa4ff. ---------------------------------------- Feature #9112: Make module lookup more dynamic (Including modules into a module after it has already been included) https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/9112#change-86848 * Author: PragTob (Tobias Pfeiffer) * Status: Closed * Priority: Normal * Assignee: matz (Yukihiro Matsumoto) ---------------------------------------- If a module (M) is included into a class (C) and afterwards another module (M2) is included into the first module (M) then C does not include M2 and instances do not respond to methods defined in M2. I think instances of C should respond to methods defined in M2 and C should include M2. I created a gist detailing the problem I have: https://gist.github.com/PragTob/7472643 I think this behavior is confusing, because if I'd reopen module M and just add methods there then instances of C can call those methods. However if I include another module in M then instances of C can not call those methods. Any opinions on if this would be a better behavior or why it isn't? (was unsure to file it as a bug or feature) -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/ Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe> <http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>