[#39260] RubySpec vs CRuby's test/... — Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core-mailing-list@...>

Before the release of Ruby 1.9.2 it was decided that Ruby releases

59 messages 2011/09/04
[#39276] Re: RubySpec vs CRuby's test/... — "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...> 2011/09/05

2011/9/5 Marc-Andre Lafortune <[email protected]>:

[#39325] Re: RubySpec vs CRuby's test/... — Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...> 2011/09/07

I'll jump in with some context from the JRuby perspective.

[#39335] Re: RubySpec vs CRuby's test/... — "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...> 2011/09/07

2011/9/7 Charles Oliver Nutter <[email protected]>:

[#39365] Re: RubySpec vs CRuby's test/... — Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...> 2011/09/08

On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 4:17 AM, NARUSE, Yui <[email protected]> wrote:

[#39366] Re: RubySpec vs CRuby's test/... — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2011/09/08

Hi,

[#39370] Re: RubySpec vs CRuby's test/... — Michael Klishin <michael.s.klishin@...> 2011/09/08

Yukihiro Matsumoto:

[#39374] Re: RubySpec vs CRuby's test/... — "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...> 2011/09/08

(2011/09/09 1:29), Michael Klishin wrote:

[#39376] Re: RubySpec vs CRuby's test/... — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2011/09/08

On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 4:19 PM, NARUSE, Yui <[email protected]> wrote:

[#39379] Re: RubySpec vs CRuby's test/... — Masaya TARUI <tarui@...> 2011/09/08

Hello Luis,

[#39382] Re: RubySpec vs CRuby's test/... — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2011/09/08

On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 5:34 PM, Masaya TARUI <[email protected]> wrote:

[#39386] Re: RubySpec vs CRuby's test/... — Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...> 2011/09/08

On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 3:57 PM, Luis Lavena <[email protected]> wrote:

[#39267] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5273][Open] Float#round returns the wrong floats for higher precision — Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core@...>

14 messages 2011/09/04

[#39435] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5306][Open] Application Hangs Due to Recent rb_thread_select Changes — Charlie Savage <cfis@...>

27 messages 2011/09/09

[#39498] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5310][Open] Integral objects — Kenta Murata <muraken@...>

13 messages 2011/09/13

[#39539] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5321][Open] Introducing Numeric#exact? and Numeric#inexact? — Kenta Murata <muraken@...>

26 messages 2011/09/14

[#39629] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5341][Open] Add SSL session reuse to Net::HTTP — Eric Hodel <[email protected]>

18 messages 2011/09/19

[#39634] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5343][Open] Unexpected blocking behavior when interrupt Socket#accept — Tomoyuki Chikanaga <nagachika00@...>

10 messages 2011/09/20

[#39673] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5353][Open] TLS v1.0 and less - Attack on CBC mode — Martin Bosslet <Martin.Bosslet@...>

13 messages 2011/09/22

[#39700] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5364][Open] How about new syntax: "object.\method" returns a Method instance? — Joey Zhou <yimutang@...>

20 messages 2011/09/25

[#39740] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5372][Open] Promote blank? to a core protocol — Alex Young <alex@...>

18 messages 2011/09/27
[#39743] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5372][Open] Promote blank? to a core protocol — Aaron Patterson <aaron@...> 2011/09/27

On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 06:18:19PM +0900, Alex Young wrote:

[#39754] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5372][Open] Promote blank? to a core protocol — Alex Young <alex@...> 2011/09/27

On 27/09/2011 19:46, Aaron Patterson wrote:

[#39807] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5372][Open] Promote blank? to a core protocol — Eric Hodel <[email protected]> 2011/10/01

On Sep 27, 2011, at 6:52 PM, Alex Young wrote:

[#39751] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5375][Open] [mingw32] segfault on WinXP SP3 with 1.9.3dev@33347 — Jon Forums <redmine@...>

26 messages 2011/09/27

[#39772] ObjectSpace.reference_form(obj) #=> references_array — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>

Hi,

13 messages 2011/09/29
[#39774] Re: ObjectSpace.reference_form(obj) #=> references_array — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2011/09/29

Hi,

[#39796] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5384][Open] Ruby 1.9.3-RC1 Fails to Compile on Solaris — Cyrus Lopez <cyrus@...>

11 messages 2011/09/30

[ruby-core:39307] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5285] Ruby 1.9.2 throws exception on sort of array containing true AND false values

From: Michael Edgar <adgar@...>
Date: 2011-09-06 18:08:11 UTC
List: ruby-core #39307
Booleans are not ordered. It doesn't make sense to say "the logical value tr=
ue is less than/greater than the logical value false" - that statement doesn=
't mean anything. I can't help but feel sorting an enumerable of booleans is=
 a nonsensical operation. I'm not even sure what purpose it would serve that=
 wouldn't more reasonably be modeled by another (likely more efficient) oper=
ation.



On Sep 6, 2011, at 1:30 PM, Pedro Medeiros <[email protected]> wrote:

>=20
> Issue #5285 has been updated by Pedro Medeiros.
>=20
>=20
> actually, by doing true <=3D> false on irb returns nil, while doing true <=
=3D> true or false <=3D> false will return 0. not necessarily an exception. W=
ouldn't it be right to return -1 or 1 by comparing true with false or false w=
ith true, even though true came from TrueClass and false came from FalseClas=
s ?
> ----------------------------------------
> Bug #5285: Ruby 1.9.2 throws exception on sort of array containing true AN=
D false values
> http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/5285
>=20
> Author: Martin Corino
> Status: Rejected
> Priority: Normal
> Assignee:=20
> Category: core
> Target version: 1.9.2
> ruby -v: ruby 1.9.2p290 (2011-07-09 revision 32553) [x86_64-linux]
>=20
>=20
> I encountered a very weird bug.
>=20
> Sorting of arrays containing identical boolean values (ALL true or ALL fal=
se) works fine.
> As soon as 1 value differs however #sort throws an exception.
>=20
>=20
> ruby-1.9.2-p290 :001 > [true, true].sort
> =3D> [true, true]=20
>=20
> ruby-1.9.2-p290 :002 > [false, false].sort
> =3D> [false, false]=20
>=20
> ruby-1.9.2-p290 :003 > [false, true].sort
> ArgumentError: comparison of FalseClass with true failed
>        from (irb):3:in `sort'
>        from (irb):3
>        from /home/martin/.rvm/rubies/ruby-1.9.2-p290/bin/irb:16:in `<main>=
'
>=20
> ruby-1.9.2-p290 :004 > [false, true, false].sort
> ArgumentError: comparison of FalseClass with true failed
>        from (irb):4:in `sort'
>        from (irb):4
>        from /home/martin/.rvm/rubies/ruby-1.9.2-p290/bin/irb:16:in `<main>=
'
>=20
> ruby-1.9.2-p290 :011 > [true, true, true, true].sort
> =3D> [true, true, true, true]=20
>=20
> ruby-1.9.2-p290 :012 > [true, true, true, false].sort
> ArgumentError: comparison of TrueClass with false failed
>        from (irb):12:in `sort'
>        from (irb):12
>        from /home/martin/.rvm/rubies/ruby-1.9.2-p290/bin/irb:16:in `<main>=
'
>=20
>=20
>=20
> --=20
> http://redmine.ruby-lang.org
>=20

In This Thread

Prev Next