[#39227] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5264][Open] Commit 33157 — Charlie Savage <cfis@...>
3 messages
2011/09/01
[#39241] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #3422][Closed] Object.const_get(:A, false) can access BasicObject::A — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>
5 messages
2011/09/03
[#39251] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #3422][Closed] Object.const_get(:A, false) can access BasicObject::A
— Magnus Holm <judofyr@...>
2011/09/03
On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 04:57, Nobuyoshi Nakada <[email protected]> wrote:
[#39258] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #3422][Closed] Object.const_get(:A, false) can access BasicObject::A
— KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...>
2011/09/04
> Why is this issue closed? Is the current behaviour acceptable?
[#39260] RubySpec vs CRuby's test/... — Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core-mailing-list@...>
Before the release of Ruby 1.9.2 it was decided that Ruby releases
59 messages
2011/09/04
[#39263] Re: RubySpec vs CRuby's test/...
— Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
2011/09/04
Hi,
[#39269] Re: RubySpec vs CRuby's test/...
— Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...>
2011/09/05
(09/05/2011 03:54 AM), Marc-Andre Lafortune wrote:
[#39270] Re: RubySpec vs CRuby's test/...
— Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core-mailing-list@...>
2011/09/05
Hi,
[#39275] Re: RubySpec vs CRuby's test/...
— "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...>
2011/09/05
2011/9/5 Marc-Andre Lafortune <[email protected]>:
[#39328] Re: RubySpec vs CRuby's test/...
— Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core-mailing-list@...>
2011/09/07
On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 3:08 AM, NARUSE, Yui <[email protected]> wrote:
[#39276] Re: RubySpec vs CRuby's test/...
— "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...>
2011/09/05
2011/9/5 Marc-Andre Lafortune <[email protected]>:
[#39325] Re: RubySpec vs CRuby's test/...
— Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...>
2011/09/07
I'll jump in with some context from the JRuby perspective.
[#39335] Re: RubySpec vs CRuby's test/...
— "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...>
2011/09/07
2011/9/7 Charles Oliver Nutter <[email protected]>:
[#39365] Re: RubySpec vs CRuby's test/...
— Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...>
2011/09/08
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 4:17 AM, NARUSE, Yui <[email protected]> wrote:
[#39366] Re: RubySpec vs CRuby's test/...
— Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
2011/09/08
Hi,
[#39370] Re: RubySpec vs CRuby's test/...
— Michael Klishin <michael.s.klishin@...>
2011/09/08
Yukihiro Matsumoto:
[#39374] Re: RubySpec vs CRuby's test/...
— "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...>
2011/09/08
(2011/09/09 1:29), Michael Klishin wrote:
[#39376] Re: RubySpec vs CRuby's test/...
— Luis Lavena <luislavena@...>
2011/09/08
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 4:19 PM, NARUSE, Yui <[email protected]> wrote:
[#39379] Re: RubySpec vs CRuby's test/...
— Masaya TARUI <tarui@...>
2011/09/08
Hello Luis,
[#39382] Re: RubySpec vs CRuby's test/...
— Luis Lavena <luislavena@...>
2011/09/08
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 5:34 PM, Masaya TARUI <[email protected]> wrote:
[#39386] Re: RubySpec vs CRuby's test/...
— Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...>
2011/09/08
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 3:57 PM, Luis Lavena <[email protected]> wrote:
[#39387] Re: RubySpec vs CRuby's test/...
— Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...>
2011/09/08
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 5:07 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter
[#39388] Re: RubySpec vs CRuby's test/...
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2011/09/08
(2011/09/08 15:28), Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
[#39394] Re: RubySpec vs CRuby's test/...
— "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...>
2011/09/09
2011/9/9 Charles Oliver Nutter <[email protected]>:
[#39396] Re: RubySpec vs CRuby's test/...
— Luis Lavena <luislavena@...>
2011/09/09
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 9:47 PM, NARUSE, Yui <[email protected]> wrote:
[#39414] Re: RubySpec vs CRuby's test/...
— Kirk Haines <wyhaines@...>
2011/09/09
I realize that I'm a small fish in this ocean, but for every release
[#39418] Re: RubySpec vs CRuby's test/...
— Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...>
2011/09/09
(09/09/2011 03:51 PM), Kirk Haines wrote:
[#39267] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5273][Open] Float#round returns the wrong floats for higher precision — Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core@...>
14 messages
2011/09/04
[#39279] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5276][Assigned] 4294967295.8.round is 4294967295 on 32bit — Yui NARUSE <naruse@...>
8 messages
2011/09/05
[#39318] [Backport93 - Backport #5276] 4294967295.8.round is 4294967295 on 32bit
— Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core@...>
2011/09/07
[#39304] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5285][Open] Ruby 1.9.2 throws exception on sort of array containing true AND false values — Martin Corino <mcorino@...>
4 messages
2011/09/06
[#39309] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5287][Open] 1.9.3 - Interpolation in a string causes the string's encoding to be set to ASCII-8BIT — Jon Leighton <j@...>
7 messages
2011/09/06
[#39311] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5287] 1.9.3 - Interpolation in a string causes the string's encoding to be set to ASCII-8BIT
— Jon Leighton <j@...>
2011/09/06
[#39326] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5291][Open] Enabling GC Profiler GC_PROFILE_MORE_DETAIL and CALC_EXACT_MALLOC_SIZE — Charlie Savage <cfis@...>
6 messages
2011/09/07
[#39360] What is the role of rb_objspace_t in gc.c? — Kurt Stephens <ks@...>
What is the role of rb_objectspace_t and the pointers to it inside gc.c?
4 messages
2011/09/08
[#39380] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5299][Open] Segmentation fault when using TweetStream gem in ruby 1.9.3 — Dushyanth Maguluru <dushyanth.maguluru@...>
6 messages
2011/09/08
[#39435] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5306][Open] Application Hangs Due to Recent rb_thread_select Changes — Charlie Savage <cfis@...>
27 messages
2011/09/09
[#39475] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5306] Application Hangs Due to Recent rb_thread_select Changes
— Motohiro KOSAKI <kosaki.motohiro@...>
2011/09/11
[#39450] Comments on HowToReportEnglish — Andrew Grimm <andrew.j.grimm@...>
I've done some proofreading for HowToReportEnglish, and I'd like to
8 messages
2011/09/10
[#39452] Re: Comments on HowToReportEnglish
— Yusuke ENDOH <mame@...>
2011/09/10
Hello,
[#39453] Re: Comments on HowToReportEnglish
— Michal Suchanek <hramrach@...>
2011/09/10
Hello
[#39451] File.realpath behavior questions — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...>
Hello,
10 messages
2011/09/10
[#39466] Re: File.realpath behavior questions
— Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>
2011/09/11
Hi,
[#39472] Re: File.realpath behavior questions
— Luis Lavena <luislavena@...>
2011/09/11
On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 4:48 AM, Nobuyoshi Nakada <[email protected]> wrot=
[#39480] Modifications to libraries like Rake should be done upstream first — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...>
Hello,
3 messages
2011/09/12
[#39484] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5309][Open] 0.6.to_r != "0.6".to_r — Brian Ford <brixen@...>
5 messages
2011/09/12
[#39487] File::BINARY does not behave as advertised — Cameron Pope <camerooni@...>
Hello -
4 messages
2011/09/12
[#39489] Re: File::BINARY does not behave as advertised
— mathew <meta@...>
2011/09/12
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 16:00, Cameron Pope <[email protected]> wrote:
[#39498] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5310][Open] Integral objects — Kenta Murata <muraken@...>
13 messages
2011/09/13
[#39500] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5310][Open] Integral objects
— brian ford <brixen@...>
2011/09/13
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 6:15 PM, Kenta Murata <[email protected]> wrote:
[#39539] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5321][Open] Introducing Numeric#exact? and Numeric#inexact? — Kenta Murata <muraken@...>
26 messages
2011/09/14
[#39597] File.expand_path ~username always trigger ArgumentError on Windows — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...>
Hello,
3 messages
2011/09/17
[#39618] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5335][Open] [RFC/PATCH] test_old_thread_select: timing tweaks — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
5 messages
2011/09/19
[#39627] Re: [ruby-cvs:40472] drbrain:r33294 (trunk): * test/openssl/test_ssl.rb (class OpenSSL): Test — "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...>
(2011/09/19 9:28), [email protected] wrote:
5 messages
2011/09/19
[#39628] Re: [ruby-cvs:40472] drbrain:r33294 (trunk): * test/openssl/test_ssl.rb (class OpenSSL): Test
— Eric Hodel <[email protected]>
2011/09/19
On Sep 19, 2011, at 11:33 AM, NARUSE, Yui wrote:
[#39667] Re: [ruby-cvs:40472] drbrain:r33294 (trunk): * test/openssl/test_ssl.rb (class OpenSSL): Test
— Martin Bo煬et <martin.bosslet@...>
2011/09/22
2011/9/19 Eric Hodel <[email protected]>:
[#39629] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5341][Open] Add SSL session reuse to Net::HTTP — Eric Hodel <[email protected]>
18 messages
2011/09/19
[#40396] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5341] Add SSL session reuse to Net::HTTP
— Eric Hodel <[email protected]>
2011/10/26
[#40413] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #5341] Add SSL session reuse to Net::HTTP
— Hiroshi Nakamura <nahi@...>
2011/10/26
On 10/26/2011 11:39 AM, Eric Hodel wrote:
[#39632] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5342][Open] ConditionVariable can wake a Thread that is no longer waiting on it — Mike Perham <mperham@...>
3 messages
2011/09/20
[#39634] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5343][Open] Unexpected blocking behavior when interrupt Socket#accept — Tomoyuki Chikanaga <nagachika00@...>
10 messages
2011/09/20
[#39639] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5343] Unexpected blocking behavior when interrupt Socket#accept
— Tomoyuki Chikanaga <nagachika00@...>
2011/09/20
[#39672] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5352][Open] How about using <> to represent Here Document? — Joey Zhou <yimutang@...>
7 messages
2011/09/22
[#39673] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5353][Open] TLS v1.0 and less - Attack on CBC mode — Martin Bosslet <Martin.Bosslet@...>
13 messages
2011/09/22
[#39684] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5357][Open] Indentation of nested operators should nest — Nikolai Weibull <now@...>
7 messages
2011/09/23
[#39690] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5360][Open] BasicObject#binding — Thomas Sawyer <transfire@...>
6 messages
2011/09/24
[#39696] Time spent on expanding load path — Juan Wajnerman <jwajnerman@...>
I've been following the performance of Ruby 1.9.x since the beginning. I =
4 messages
2011/09/24
[#39700] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5364][Open] How about new syntax: "object.\method" returns a Method instance? — Joey Zhou <yimutang@...>
20 messages
2011/09/25
[#39704] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5365][Open] WEBrick lacks the application/javascript and image/svg+xml MIME types. — Hal Brodigan <postmodern.mod3@...>
4 messages
2011/09/25
[#39740] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5372][Open] Promote blank? to a core protocol — Alex Young <alex@...>
18 messages
2011/09/27
[#39743] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5372][Open] Promote blank? to a core protocol
— Aaron Patterson <aaron@...>
2011/09/27
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 06:18:19PM +0900, Alex Young wrote:
[#39754] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5372][Open] Promote blank? to a core protocol
— Alex Young <alex@...>
2011/09/27
On 27/09/2011 19:46, Aaron Patterson wrote:
[#39807] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5372][Open] Promote blank? to a core protocol
— Eric Hodel <[email protected]>
2011/10/01
On Sep 27, 2011, at 6:52 PM, Alex Young wrote:
[#39843] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5372][Open] Promote blank? to a core protocol
— Alex Young <alex@...>
2011/10/02
Eric Hodel wrote in post #1024462:
[#39936] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5372][Open] Promote blank? to a core protocol
— Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>
2011/10/04
Hi,
[#39943] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5372][Open] Promote blank? to a core protocol
— Alex Young <alex@...>
2011/10/04
On 04/10/11 16:52, Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:
[#39772] ObjectSpace.reference_form(obj) #=> references_array — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
Hi,
13 messages
2011/09/29
[#39774] Re: ObjectSpace.reference_form(obj) #=> references_array
— Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>
2011/09/29
Hi,
[#39785] Re: ObjectSpace.reference_form(obj) #=> references_array
— hemant <gethemant@...>
2011/09/30
Hi,
[#39789] Re: ObjectSpace.reference_form(obj) #=> references_array
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2011/09/30
(2011/09/30 5:37), hemant wrote:
[#39812] Re: ObjectSpace.reference_form(obj) #=> references_array
— Tim Felgentreff <[email protected]>
2011/10/01
On 09/30/2011 07:08 AM, SASADA Koichi wrote:
[#47627] Re: ObjectSpace.reference_form(obj) #=> references_array
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2012/09/21
Revisit.
[#47682] Re: ObjectSpace.reference_form(obj) #=> references_array
— Eric Hodel <[email protected]>
2012/09/24
On Sep 20, 2012, at 6:14 PM, SASADA Koichi <[email protected]> wrote:
[#47686] Re: ObjectSpace.reference_form(obj) #=> references_array
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2012/09/25
(2012/09/25 7:38), Eric Hodel wrote:
[#47687] Re: ObjectSpace.reference_form(obj) #=> references_array
— Narihiro Nakamura <authornari@...>
2012/09/25
I'm sorry for late reply.
[#47688] Re: ObjectSpace.reference_form(obj) #=> references_array
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2012/09/25
(2012/09/25 15:18), Narihiro Nakamura wrote:
[#39787] Running the YARV parser/compiler without GC? — Magnus Holm <judofyr@...>
Hey smart folks,
3 messages
2011/09/30
[ruby-core:39726] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5364] How about new syntax: "object.\method" returns a Method instance?
From:
Joey Zhou <yimutang@...>
Date:
2011-09-26 06:37:43 UTC
List:
ruby-core #39726
Issue #5364 has been updated by Joey Zhou.
Well, Proc instances and Method instances are both closures. To obtain a closure, the Ruby idiom is almost from a block, not very often from a method. But in some situation, creating a closure from a method is more natural.
For example, if I want this:
['file1', 'file2', 'file3'].map {|f| open(f) }
how about:
['file1', 'file2', 'file3'].map &\open
and:
str = "abcdabcdabcd"
%w(a b c d).map {|sep| str.split(sep)}
how about:
%w(a b c d).map &str.\split
Of course, every Method instance can be converted to a Proc object with Method#to_proc.
str.method(:split)
is somewhat like:
lambda {|*args| str.send(:split, *args) }
but I'm afraid it's verbose to write and read.
I've just begun to learn Python recently, and find some interesting differences between the two languages.
Python's lambda is trivial, only one line code is allowed to create a lambda. However, its functions are first class objects, so that can be assigned to another variable easily.
Python seems mainly using objects from function to do some functional programming thing, while Ruby seems mainly using objects from blocks.
>>> a = lambda n: n + 1
>>> a
<function <lambda> at 0x011F6170>
>>> def foo(n):
return n + 1
>>> b = foo
>>> b
<function foo at 0x011F2670>
whether from a lambda, or from a function, the returnning objects are both functions.
But in Ruby, if we do the similar thing, a will be a Proc instance, and b will be a Method instance.
Ruby distinguishes Proc and Method, but seems not paying much attention to Method? You can obtain a closure from a method, but it seems not Ruby idiom?
Joshua Ballanco and Yusuke Endoh san remind me the deeper subject: what's the future plan about the relationship between Proc and Method?
----------------------------------------
Feature #5364: How about new syntax: "object.\method" returns a Method instance?
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/5364
Author: Joey Zhou
Status: Open
Priority: Normal
Assignee:
Category: core
Target version:
I'm afraid the normal way of creating a Method instance is circuitous and a bit hard to write:
a_method = object.method(:method_name)
I find the way of obtaining a function/method object in Python is so easy, for example, "str.split()" returns a list, while "str.split" (without parentheses) returns a method object. However, parenthesis in Ruby is always optional, so this road is blocked.
Well, how about "object.\method" style? You can type "str.\split" to get "str.method(:split)".
The reasons are:
1. It makes people happy, writing less code, and no harm to readability.
2. "\" is not a frequently used token. It can only be used in strings, regexps (or any else?). I think using this token leads to no ambiguity.
3. "\" is like Perl's referrence symbol. In Perl, you can use "$f = \&func;" to make a referrence to the function. In Ruby, "&" seems unnecessary.
4. It enhances the consistency of the language syntax. There are two correlative methods "Object#send" and "Object#method", but...
str.send(:split) == str.split
str.method(:split) == ???????
If adding this new syntax, it looks more pretty:
str.method(:split) == str.\split
--
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org