[#39227] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5264][Open] Commit 33157 — Charlie Savage <cfis@...>
3 messages
2011/09/01
[#39241] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #3422][Closed] Object.const_get(:A, false) can access BasicObject::A — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>
5 messages
2011/09/03
[#39251] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #3422][Closed] Object.const_get(:A, false) can access BasicObject::A
— Magnus Holm <judofyr@...>
2011/09/03
On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 04:57, Nobuyoshi Nakada <[email protected]> wrote:
[#39258] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #3422][Closed] Object.const_get(:A, false) can access BasicObject::A
— KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...>
2011/09/04
> Why is this issue closed? Is the current behaviour acceptable?
[#39260] RubySpec vs CRuby's test/... — Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core-mailing-list@...>
Before the release of Ruby 1.9.2 it was decided that Ruby releases
59 messages
2011/09/04
[#39263] Re: RubySpec vs CRuby's test/...
— Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
2011/09/04
Hi,
[#39269] Re: RubySpec vs CRuby's test/...
— Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...>
2011/09/05
(09/05/2011 03:54 AM), Marc-Andre Lafortune wrote:
[#39270] Re: RubySpec vs CRuby's test/...
— Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core-mailing-list@...>
2011/09/05
Hi,
[#39275] Re: RubySpec vs CRuby's test/...
— "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...>
2011/09/05
2011/9/5 Marc-Andre Lafortune <[email protected]>:
[#39328] Re: RubySpec vs CRuby's test/...
— Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core-mailing-list@...>
2011/09/07
On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 3:08 AM, NARUSE, Yui <[email protected]> wrote:
[#39276] Re: RubySpec vs CRuby's test/...
— "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...>
2011/09/05
2011/9/5 Marc-Andre Lafortune <[email protected]>:
[#39325] Re: RubySpec vs CRuby's test/...
— Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...>
2011/09/07
I'll jump in with some context from the JRuby perspective.
[#39335] Re: RubySpec vs CRuby's test/...
— "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...>
2011/09/07
2011/9/7 Charles Oliver Nutter <[email protected]>:
[#39365] Re: RubySpec vs CRuby's test/...
— Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...>
2011/09/08
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 4:17 AM, NARUSE, Yui <[email protected]> wrote:
[#39366] Re: RubySpec vs CRuby's test/...
— Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
2011/09/08
Hi,
[#39370] Re: RubySpec vs CRuby's test/...
— Michael Klishin <michael.s.klishin@...>
2011/09/08
Yukihiro Matsumoto:
[#39374] Re: RubySpec vs CRuby's test/...
— "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...>
2011/09/08
(2011/09/09 1:29), Michael Klishin wrote:
[#39376] Re: RubySpec vs CRuby's test/...
— Luis Lavena <luislavena@...>
2011/09/08
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 4:19 PM, NARUSE, Yui <[email protected]> wrote:
[#39379] Re: RubySpec vs CRuby's test/...
— Masaya TARUI <tarui@...>
2011/09/08
Hello Luis,
[#39382] Re: RubySpec vs CRuby's test/...
— Luis Lavena <luislavena@...>
2011/09/08
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 5:34 PM, Masaya TARUI <[email protected]> wrote:
[#39386] Re: RubySpec vs CRuby's test/...
— Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...>
2011/09/08
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 3:57 PM, Luis Lavena <[email protected]> wrote:
[#39387] Re: RubySpec vs CRuby's test/...
— Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...>
2011/09/08
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 5:07 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter
[#39388] Re: RubySpec vs CRuby's test/...
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2011/09/08
(2011/09/08 15:28), Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
[#39394] Re: RubySpec vs CRuby's test/...
— "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...>
2011/09/09
2011/9/9 Charles Oliver Nutter <[email protected]>:
[#39396] Re: RubySpec vs CRuby's test/...
— Luis Lavena <luislavena@...>
2011/09/09
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 9:47 PM, NARUSE, Yui <[email protected]> wrote:
[#39414] Re: RubySpec vs CRuby's test/...
— Kirk Haines <wyhaines@...>
2011/09/09
I realize that I'm a small fish in this ocean, but for every release
[#39418] Re: RubySpec vs CRuby's test/...
— Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...>
2011/09/09
(09/09/2011 03:51 PM), Kirk Haines wrote:
[#39267] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5273][Open] Float#round returns the wrong floats for higher precision — Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core@...>
14 messages
2011/09/04
[#39279] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5276][Assigned] 4294967295.8.round is 4294967295 on 32bit — Yui NARUSE <naruse@...>
8 messages
2011/09/05
[#39318] [Backport93 - Backport #5276] 4294967295.8.round is 4294967295 on 32bit
— Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core@...>
2011/09/07
[#39304] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5285][Open] Ruby 1.9.2 throws exception on sort of array containing true AND false values — Martin Corino <mcorino@...>
4 messages
2011/09/06
[#39309] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5287][Open] 1.9.3 - Interpolation in a string causes the string's encoding to be set to ASCII-8BIT — Jon Leighton <j@...>
7 messages
2011/09/06
[#39311] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5287] 1.9.3 - Interpolation in a string causes the string's encoding to be set to ASCII-8BIT
— Jon Leighton <j@...>
2011/09/06
[#39326] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5291][Open] Enabling GC Profiler GC_PROFILE_MORE_DETAIL and CALC_EXACT_MALLOC_SIZE — Charlie Savage <cfis@...>
6 messages
2011/09/07
[#39360] What is the role of rb_objspace_t in gc.c? — Kurt Stephens <ks@...>
What is the role of rb_objectspace_t and the pointers to it inside gc.c?
4 messages
2011/09/08
[#39380] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5299][Open] Segmentation fault when using TweetStream gem in ruby 1.9.3 — Dushyanth Maguluru <dushyanth.maguluru@...>
6 messages
2011/09/08
[#39435] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5306][Open] Application Hangs Due to Recent rb_thread_select Changes — Charlie Savage <cfis@...>
27 messages
2011/09/09
[#39475] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5306] Application Hangs Due to Recent rb_thread_select Changes
— Motohiro KOSAKI <kosaki.motohiro@...>
2011/09/11
[#39450] Comments on HowToReportEnglish — Andrew Grimm <andrew.j.grimm@...>
I've done some proofreading for HowToReportEnglish, and I'd like to
8 messages
2011/09/10
[#39452] Re: Comments on HowToReportEnglish
— Yusuke ENDOH <mame@...>
2011/09/10
Hello,
[#39453] Re: Comments on HowToReportEnglish
— Michal Suchanek <hramrach@...>
2011/09/10
Hello
[#39451] File.realpath behavior questions — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...>
Hello,
10 messages
2011/09/10
[#39466] Re: File.realpath behavior questions
— Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>
2011/09/11
Hi,
[#39472] Re: File.realpath behavior questions
— Luis Lavena <luislavena@...>
2011/09/11
On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 4:48 AM, Nobuyoshi Nakada <[email protected]> wrot=
[#39480] Modifications to libraries like Rake should be done upstream first — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...>
Hello,
3 messages
2011/09/12
[#39484] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5309][Open] 0.6.to_r != "0.6".to_r — Brian Ford <brixen@...>
5 messages
2011/09/12
[#39487] File::BINARY does not behave as advertised — Cameron Pope <camerooni@...>
Hello -
4 messages
2011/09/12
[#39489] Re: File::BINARY does not behave as advertised
— mathew <meta@...>
2011/09/12
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 16:00, Cameron Pope <[email protected]> wrote:
[#39498] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5310][Open] Integral objects — Kenta Murata <muraken@...>
13 messages
2011/09/13
[#39500] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5310][Open] Integral objects
— brian ford <brixen@...>
2011/09/13
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 6:15 PM, Kenta Murata <[email protected]> wrote:
[#39539] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5321][Open] Introducing Numeric#exact? and Numeric#inexact? — Kenta Murata <muraken@...>
26 messages
2011/09/14
[#39597] File.expand_path ~username always trigger ArgumentError on Windows — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...>
Hello,
3 messages
2011/09/17
[#39618] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5335][Open] [RFC/PATCH] test_old_thread_select: timing tweaks — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
5 messages
2011/09/19
[#39627] Re: [ruby-cvs:40472] drbrain:r33294 (trunk): * test/openssl/test_ssl.rb (class OpenSSL): Test — "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...>
(2011/09/19 9:28), [email protected] wrote:
5 messages
2011/09/19
[#39628] Re: [ruby-cvs:40472] drbrain:r33294 (trunk): * test/openssl/test_ssl.rb (class OpenSSL): Test
— Eric Hodel <[email protected]>
2011/09/19
On Sep 19, 2011, at 11:33 AM, NARUSE, Yui wrote:
[#39667] Re: [ruby-cvs:40472] drbrain:r33294 (trunk): * test/openssl/test_ssl.rb (class OpenSSL): Test
— Martin Bo煬et <martin.bosslet@...>
2011/09/22
2011/9/19 Eric Hodel <[email protected]>:
[#39629] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5341][Open] Add SSL session reuse to Net::HTTP — Eric Hodel <[email protected]>
18 messages
2011/09/19
[#40396] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5341] Add SSL session reuse to Net::HTTP
— Eric Hodel <[email protected]>
2011/10/26
[#40413] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #5341] Add SSL session reuse to Net::HTTP
— Hiroshi Nakamura <nahi@...>
2011/10/26
On 10/26/2011 11:39 AM, Eric Hodel wrote:
[#39632] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5342][Open] ConditionVariable can wake a Thread that is no longer waiting on it — Mike Perham <mperham@...>
3 messages
2011/09/20
[#39634] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5343][Open] Unexpected blocking behavior when interrupt Socket#accept — Tomoyuki Chikanaga <nagachika00@...>
10 messages
2011/09/20
[#39639] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5343] Unexpected blocking behavior when interrupt Socket#accept
— Tomoyuki Chikanaga <nagachika00@...>
2011/09/20
[#39672] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5352][Open] How about using <> to represent Here Document? — Joey Zhou <yimutang@...>
7 messages
2011/09/22
[#39673] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5353][Open] TLS v1.0 and less - Attack on CBC mode — Martin Bosslet <Martin.Bosslet@...>
13 messages
2011/09/22
[#39684] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5357][Open] Indentation of nested operators should nest — Nikolai Weibull <now@...>
7 messages
2011/09/23
[#39690] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5360][Open] BasicObject#binding — Thomas Sawyer <transfire@...>
6 messages
2011/09/24
[#39696] Time spent on expanding load path — Juan Wajnerman <jwajnerman@...>
I've been following the performance of Ruby 1.9.x since the beginning. I =
4 messages
2011/09/24
[#39700] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5364][Open] How about new syntax: "object.\method" returns a Method instance? — Joey Zhou <yimutang@...>
20 messages
2011/09/25
[#39704] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5365][Open] WEBrick lacks the application/javascript and image/svg+xml MIME types. — Hal Brodigan <postmodern.mod3@...>
4 messages
2011/09/25
[#39740] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5372][Open] Promote blank? to a core protocol — Alex Young <alex@...>
18 messages
2011/09/27
[#39743] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5372][Open] Promote blank? to a core protocol
— Aaron Patterson <aaron@...>
2011/09/27
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 06:18:19PM +0900, Alex Young wrote:
[#39754] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5372][Open] Promote blank? to a core protocol
— Alex Young <alex@...>
2011/09/27
On 27/09/2011 19:46, Aaron Patterson wrote:
[#39807] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5372][Open] Promote blank? to a core protocol
— Eric Hodel <[email protected]>
2011/10/01
On Sep 27, 2011, at 6:52 PM, Alex Young wrote:
[#39843] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5372][Open] Promote blank? to a core protocol
— Alex Young <alex@...>
2011/10/02
Eric Hodel wrote in post #1024462:
[#39936] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5372][Open] Promote blank? to a core protocol
— Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>
2011/10/04
Hi,
[#39943] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5372][Open] Promote blank? to a core protocol
— Alex Young <alex@...>
2011/10/04
On 04/10/11 16:52, Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:
[#39772] ObjectSpace.reference_form(obj) #=> references_array — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
Hi,
13 messages
2011/09/29
[#39774] Re: ObjectSpace.reference_form(obj) #=> references_array
— Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>
2011/09/29
Hi,
[#39785] Re: ObjectSpace.reference_form(obj) #=> references_array
— hemant <gethemant@...>
2011/09/30
Hi,
[#39789] Re: ObjectSpace.reference_form(obj) #=> references_array
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2011/09/30
(2011/09/30 5:37), hemant wrote:
[#39812] Re: ObjectSpace.reference_form(obj) #=> references_array
— Tim Felgentreff <[email protected]>
2011/10/01
On 09/30/2011 07:08 AM, SASADA Koichi wrote:
[#47627] Re: ObjectSpace.reference_form(obj) #=> references_array
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2012/09/21
Revisit.
[#47682] Re: ObjectSpace.reference_form(obj) #=> references_array
— Eric Hodel <[email protected]>
2012/09/24
On Sep 20, 2012, at 6:14 PM, SASADA Koichi <[email protected]> wrote:
[#47686] Re: ObjectSpace.reference_form(obj) #=> references_array
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2012/09/25
(2012/09/25 7:38), Eric Hodel wrote:
[#47687] Re: ObjectSpace.reference_form(obj) #=> references_array
— Narihiro Nakamura <authornari@...>
2012/09/25
I'm sorry for late reply.
[#47688] Re: ObjectSpace.reference_form(obj) #=> references_array
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2012/09/25
(2012/09/25 15:18), Narihiro Nakamura wrote:
[#39787] Running the YARV parser/compiler without GC? — Magnus Holm <judofyr@...>
Hey smart folks,
3 messages
2011/09/30
[ruby-core:39434] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5304][Open] Array#pack handles objects for eg format 'E' differently than 1.8
From:
Brian Ford <brixen@...>
Date:
2011-09-09 20:32:37 UTC
List:
ruby-core #39434
Issue #5304 has been reported by Brian Ford.
----------------------------------------
Bug #5304: Array#pack handles objects for eg format 'E' differently than 1.8
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/5304
Author: Brian Ford
Status: Open
Priority: Normal
Assignee:
Category:
Target version:
ruby -v: ruby 1.9.2p290 (2011-07-09 revision 32553) [x86_64-darwin10.8.0]
In 1.9, Array#pack when passed an object that defines #to_f and one of the Float formats raises a TypeError. This is a change from 1.8. The code in 1.9 calls rb_to_float()
# 1.9
VALUE
rb_to_float(VALUE val)
{
if (TYPE(val) == T_FLOAT) return val;
if (!rb_obj_is_kind_of(val, rb_cNumeric)) {
rb_raise(rb_eTypeError, "can't convert %s into Float",
NIL_P(val) ? "nil" :
val == Qtrue ? "true" :
val == Qfalse ? "false" :
rb_obj_classname(val));
}
return rb_convert_type(val, T_FLOAT, "Float", "to_f");
}
The rb_to_float() imposes the (arbitrary) restriction that the object be kind of Numeric. The 1.8 pack code used rb_Float(), which merely requires the object respond to #to_f and return a Float.
The treatment of objects in 1.9 for the float formats is thus different than for eg the integer formats, where the object simply must respond to #to_int. The requirement that the object be a kind of Numeric breaks the uniform ducktyping and imposes an arbitrary and unnecessary type/class requirement.
Was this change intended, and if so, why? Apologies if this was discussed on ruby-core prior to the change; I could not find any discussion through searching.
The following code illustrates the issue:
o = Object.new
def o.to_int
puts "to_int called"
1
end
def o.to_f
puts "to_f called"
1.1
end
p [o].pack("I") # => "\001..." (depends on endianness)
p [o].pack("E") # => 1.8 - "<numbers>"; 1.9 - TypeError
$ ruby1.8.7 -v pack_test.rb
ruby 1.8.7 (2011-02-18 patchlevel 334) [i686-darwin10.8.0]
to_int called
"\001\000\000\000"
to_f called
"\232\231\231\231\231\231\361?"
$ ruby1.9.2 -v pack_test.rb
ruby 1.9.2p290 (2011-07-09 revision 32553) [x86_64-darwin10.8.0]
to_int called
"\x01\x00\x00\x00"
pack_test.rb:14:in `pack': can't convert Object into Float (TypeError)
from pack_test.rb:14:in `<main>'
--
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org