[#39227] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5264][Open] Commit 33157 — Charlie Savage <cfis@...>
[#39241] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #3422][Closed] Object.const_get(:A, false) can access BasicObject::A — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>
On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 04:57, Nobuyoshi Nakada <[email protected]> wrote:
> Why is this issue closed? Is the current behaviour acceptable?
[#39260] RubySpec vs CRuby's test/... — Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core-mailing-list@...>
Before the release of Ruby 1.9.2 it was decided that Ruby releases
Hi,
(09/05/2011 03:54 AM), Marc-Andre Lafortune wrote:
Hi,
2011/9/5 Marc-Andre Lafortune <[email protected]>:
On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 3:08 AM, NARUSE, Yui <[email protected]> wrote:
2011/9/5 Marc-Andre Lafortune <[email protected]>:
I'll jump in with some context from the JRuby perspective.
2011/9/7 Charles Oliver Nutter <[email protected]>:
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 4:17 AM, NARUSE, Yui <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi,
Yukihiro Matsumoto:
(2011/09/09 1:29), Michael Klishin wrote:
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 4:19 PM, NARUSE, Yui <[email protected]> wrote:
Hello Luis,
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 5:34 PM, Masaya TARUI <[email protected]> wrote:
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 3:57 PM, Luis Lavena <[email protected]> wrote:
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 5:07 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter
(2011/09/08 15:28), Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
2011/9/9 Charles Oliver Nutter <[email protected]>:
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 9:47 PM, NARUSE, Yui <[email protected]> wrote:
I realize that I'm a small fish in this ocean, but for every release
(09/09/2011 03:51 PM), Kirk Haines wrote:
[#39267] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5273][Open] Float#round returns the wrong floats for higher precision — Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core@...>
[#39279] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5276][Assigned] 4294967295.8.round is 4294967295 on 32bit — Yui NARUSE <naruse@...>
[#39304] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5285][Open] Ruby 1.9.2 throws exception on sort of array containing true AND false values — Martin Corino <mcorino@...>
[#39309] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5287][Open] 1.9.3 - Interpolation in a string causes the string's encoding to be set to ASCII-8BIT — Jon Leighton <j@...>
[#39326] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5291][Open] Enabling GC Profiler GC_PROFILE_MORE_DETAIL and CALC_EXACT_MALLOC_SIZE — Charlie Savage <cfis@...>
[#39360] What is the role of rb_objspace_t in gc.c? — Kurt Stephens <ks@...>
What is the role of rb_objectspace_t and the pointers to it inside gc.c?
[#39380] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5299][Open] Segmentation fault when using TweetStream gem in ruby 1.9.3 — Dushyanth Maguluru <dushyanth.maguluru@...>
[#39435] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5306][Open] Application Hangs Due to Recent rb_thread_select Changes — Charlie Savage <cfis@...>
[#39450] Comments on HowToReportEnglish — Andrew Grimm <andrew.j.grimm@...>
I've done some proofreading for HowToReportEnglish, and I'd like to
Hello,
Hello
[#39451] File.realpath behavior questions — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...>
Hello,
Hi,
On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 4:48 AM, Nobuyoshi Nakada <[email protected]> wrot=
[#39480] Modifications to libraries like Rake should be done upstream first — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...>
Hello,
[#39484] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5309][Open] 0.6.to_r != "0.6".to_r — Brian Ford <brixen@...>
[#39487] File::BINARY does not behave as advertised — Cameron Pope <camerooni@...>
Hello -
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 16:00, Cameron Pope <[email protected]> wrote:
[#39498] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5310][Open] Integral objects — Kenta Murata <muraken@...>
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 6:15 PM, Kenta Murata <[email protected]> wrote:
[#39539] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5321][Open] Introducing Numeric#exact? and Numeric#inexact? — Kenta Murata <muraken@...>
[#39597] File.expand_path ~username always trigger ArgumentError on Windows — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...>
Hello,
[#39618] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5335][Open] [RFC/PATCH] test_old_thread_select: timing tweaks — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
[#39627] Re: [ruby-cvs:40472] drbrain:r33294 (trunk): * test/openssl/test_ssl.rb (class OpenSSL): Test — "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...>
(2011/09/19 9:28), [email protected] wrote:
On Sep 19, 2011, at 11:33 AM, NARUSE, Yui wrote:
2011/9/19 Eric Hodel <[email protected]>:
[#39629] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5341][Open] Add SSL session reuse to Net::HTTP — Eric Hodel <[email protected]>
On 10/26/2011 11:39 AM, Eric Hodel wrote:
[#39632] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5342][Open] ConditionVariable can wake a Thread that is no longer waiting on it — Mike Perham <mperham@...>
[#39634] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5343][Open] Unexpected blocking behavior when interrupt Socket#accept — Tomoyuki Chikanaga <nagachika00@...>
[#39672] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5352][Open] How about using <> to represent Here Document? — Joey Zhou <yimutang@...>
[#39673] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5353][Open] TLS v1.0 and less - Attack on CBC mode — Martin Bosslet <Martin.Bosslet@...>
[#39684] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5357][Open] Indentation of nested operators should nest — Nikolai Weibull <now@...>
[#39690] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5360][Open] BasicObject#binding — Thomas Sawyer <transfire@...>
[#39696] Time spent on expanding load path — Juan Wajnerman <jwajnerman@...>
I've been following the performance of Ruby 1.9.x since the beginning. I =
[#39700] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5364][Open] How about new syntax: "object.\method" returns a Method instance? — Joey Zhou <yimutang@...>
[#39704] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5365][Open] WEBrick lacks the application/javascript and image/svg+xml MIME types. — Hal Brodigan <postmodern.mod3@...>
[#39740] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5372][Open] Promote blank? to a core protocol — Alex Young <alex@...>
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 06:18:19PM +0900, Alex Young wrote:
On 27/09/2011 19:46, Aaron Patterson wrote:
On Sep 27, 2011, at 6:52 PM, Alex Young wrote:
Eric Hodel wrote in post #1024462:
Hi,
On 04/10/11 16:52, Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:
[#39772] ObjectSpace.reference_form(obj) #=> references_array — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
Hi,
Hi,
Hi,
(2011/09/30 5:37), hemant wrote:
On 09/30/2011 07:08 AM, SASADA Koichi wrote:
Revisit.
On Sep 20, 2012, at 6:14 PM, SASADA Koichi <[email protected]> wrote:
(2012/09/25 7:38), Eric Hodel wrote:
I'm sorry for late reply.
(2012/09/25 15:18), Narihiro Nakamura wrote:
[#39787] Running the YARV parser/compiler without GC? — Magnus Holm <judofyr@...>
Hey smart folks,
[ruby-core:39743] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5372][Open] Promote blank? to a core protocol
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 06:18:19PM +0900, Alex Young wrote: >=20 > Issue #5372 has been reported by Alex Young. >=20 > ---------------------------------------- > Feature #5372: Promote blank? to a core protocol > http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/5372 >=20 > Author: Alex Young > Status: Open > Priority: Normal > Assignee:=20 > Category: core > Target version: 1.9.4 >=20 >=20 > I don't think there's been a project I've used that hasn't made use of th= is pattern: >=20 > if thing.nil? || thing.empty? >=20 > somewhere in its source. This is necessary because it is idiomatic to re= turn nil where other languages might return a null object, and there is no = universal test for nullity which a user-implemented class can provide witho= ut issues. >=20 > Facets (and ActiveSupport) define a #blank? protocol which allows for the= above to be replaced with: >=20 > if thing.blank? >=20 > Being able to type this on a first iteration saves forgetting one of the = cases and having to come back to fix a bug later. For projects where I can= not directly use Facets or ActiveSupport, I always find that I rewrite a ve= rsion for myself. It would be very convenient not to have to do this every= time, and this is clearly a common case, so I propose that #blank? be impl= emented on the following classes: >=20 > Object: to return false > String: aliased to #empty? > NilClass: to return true > TrueClass: to return false > FalseClass: to return true > Array: aliased to #empty? > Hash: aliased to #empty? > Fiber: to return !alive? > Numeric: aliased to #zero? > IO: aliased to #closed? > MatchData: to return #to_s.blank? > Process::Status: aliased to #exited? > Range: to return self.include?(self.begin) > Struct: subclass instances to return values.blank? > Thread: to return !alive? > ThreadGroup: to return list.blank? >=20 > Some of these uses aren't described by the word "blank?" very well (and A= ctiveSupport's String#blank? is somewhat different), so as a sub-feature I'= d like to suggest "null?" as an alternative method name. >=20 > Apologies if this has been proposed and rejected before, but a quick sear= ch of redmine didn't show anything relevant. "empty?" implies that you're performing the operation on a set. Why would you treat these other objects as sets? It doesn't make sense to me. Not to mention defining the method on every possible object seems bad. What if my function shouldn't be dealing with Thread objects? I'd rather a NoMethodError be raised. --=20 Aaron Patterson http://tenderlovemaking.com/