[#39260] RubySpec vs CRuby's test/... — Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core-mailing-list@...>

Before the release of Ruby 1.9.2 it was decided that Ruby releases

59 messages 2011/09/04
[#39276] Re: RubySpec vs CRuby's test/... — "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...> 2011/09/05

2011/9/5 Marc-Andre Lafortune <[email protected]>:

[#39325] Re: RubySpec vs CRuby's test/... — Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...> 2011/09/07

I'll jump in with some context from the JRuby perspective.

[#39335] Re: RubySpec vs CRuby's test/... — "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...> 2011/09/07

2011/9/7 Charles Oliver Nutter <[email protected]>:

[#39365] Re: RubySpec vs CRuby's test/... — Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...> 2011/09/08

On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 4:17 AM, NARUSE, Yui <[email protected]> wrote:

[#39366] Re: RubySpec vs CRuby's test/... — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2011/09/08

Hi,

[#39370] Re: RubySpec vs CRuby's test/... — Michael Klishin <michael.s.klishin@...> 2011/09/08

Yukihiro Matsumoto:

[#39374] Re: RubySpec vs CRuby's test/... — "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...> 2011/09/08

(2011/09/09 1:29), Michael Klishin wrote:

[#39376] Re: RubySpec vs CRuby's test/... — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2011/09/08

On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 4:19 PM, NARUSE, Yui <[email protected]> wrote:

[#39379] Re: RubySpec vs CRuby's test/... — Masaya TARUI <tarui@...> 2011/09/08

Hello Luis,

[#39382] Re: RubySpec vs CRuby's test/... — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2011/09/08

On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 5:34 PM, Masaya TARUI <[email protected]> wrote:

[#39386] Re: RubySpec vs CRuby's test/... — Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...> 2011/09/08

On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 3:57 PM, Luis Lavena <[email protected]> wrote:

[#39267] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5273][Open] Float#round returns the wrong floats for higher precision — Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core@...>

14 messages 2011/09/04

[#39435] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5306][Open] Application Hangs Due to Recent rb_thread_select Changes — Charlie Savage <cfis@...>

27 messages 2011/09/09

[#39498] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5310][Open] Integral objects — Kenta Murata <muraken@...>

13 messages 2011/09/13

[#39539] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5321][Open] Introducing Numeric#exact? and Numeric#inexact? — Kenta Murata <muraken@...>

26 messages 2011/09/14

[#39629] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5341][Open] Add SSL session reuse to Net::HTTP — Eric Hodel <[email protected]>

18 messages 2011/09/19

[#39634] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5343][Open] Unexpected blocking behavior when interrupt Socket#accept — Tomoyuki Chikanaga <nagachika00@...>

10 messages 2011/09/20

[#39673] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5353][Open] TLS v1.0 and less - Attack on CBC mode — Martin Bosslet <Martin.Bosslet@...>

13 messages 2011/09/22

[#39700] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5364][Open] How about new syntax: "object.\method" returns a Method instance? — Joey Zhou <yimutang@...>

20 messages 2011/09/25

[#39740] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5372][Open] Promote blank? to a core protocol — Alex Young <alex@...>

18 messages 2011/09/27
[#39743] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5372][Open] Promote blank? to a core protocol — Aaron Patterson <aaron@...> 2011/09/27

On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 06:18:19PM +0900, Alex Young wrote:

[#39754] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5372][Open] Promote blank? to a core protocol — Alex Young <alex@...> 2011/09/27

On 27/09/2011 19:46, Aaron Patterson wrote:

[#39807] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5372][Open] Promote blank? to a core protocol — Eric Hodel <[email protected]> 2011/10/01

On Sep 27, 2011, at 6:52 PM, Alex Young wrote:

[#39751] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5375][Open] [mingw32] segfault on WinXP SP3 with 1.9.3dev@33347 — Jon Forums <redmine@...>

26 messages 2011/09/27

[#39772] ObjectSpace.reference_form(obj) #=> references_array — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>

Hi,

13 messages 2011/09/29
[#39774] Re: ObjectSpace.reference_form(obj) #=> references_array — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2011/09/29

Hi,

[#39796] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5384][Open] Ruby 1.9.3-RC1 Fails to Compile on Solaris — Cyrus Lopez <cyrus@...>

11 messages 2011/09/30

[ruby-core:39636] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5333][Open] Coverage library giving wrong results

From: Yusuke ENDOH <mame@...>
Date: 2011-09-20 08:34:59 UTC
List: ruby-core #39636
Hello, sorry for late reply.  I had a short trip.

2011/9/17 Christoph Olszowka <[email protected]>:
> I'm the author of the simplecov gem, a wrapper on top of the Coverage library.

Thank you for the useful gem!  simplecov is one of my favorite gems.


> I forked the application and added some instructions to the readme. You can find it at https://github.com/colszowka/coverage-bug

Great, thank you for tracking the bug and providing the reproducing code!
But, I cannot repro very unfortunately.  I explain what I did.


I tried to follow your instruction, but rake db:migrate failed.

  $ ruby -v
  ruby 1.9.2p290 (2011-07-09 revision 32553) [i686-linux]

  $ git clone https://github.com/colszowka/coverage-bug.git

  $ cd coverage-bug

  $ bundle

  $ rake db:migrate
  (in /home/mame/work/ruby/coverage-bug)
  rake aborted!
  uninitialized constant Rake::DSL
  *snip*


By searching the web, I knew it seems rake and rails version conflict.
So I added "gem 'rake', '0.8.7'" to Gemfile, and rake db:migrate succeeded:

  $ bundle update rake

  $ rake db:migrate


Then, I can see the results of rake spec:

  $ rake spec
  (in /home/mame/work/ruby/coverage-bug)
  /home/mame/local/bin/ruby -S bundle exec rspec
./spec/requests/competitions_spec.rb ./spec/models/competition_spec.rb
  No DRb server is running. Running in local process instead ...

  Competition
    GET /competitions/:id
      should display basic information

  Competition
    validations
      should require ends_at >= starts_at

  Finished in 0.58459 seconds
  2 examples, 0 failures
  ["/home/mame/work/ruby/coverage-bug/app/models/competition.rb",
   [1, 1, nil, 1, 1, nil, 1, 1, 2, 2, nil, nil, nil]]

and with changing 1 == 2 to 1 == 1,

  $ rake spec
  *snip*
  ["/home/mame/work/ruby/coverage-bug/app/models/competition.rb",
   [1, 1, nil, 1, 1, nil, 1, 1, 2, 2, nil, nil, nil]]


Looks like the two results are same.  I'm not sure if it is correct,
though.
Please let me know if I did not do it right, or if anyone suceeded to
reproduce the bug.


The reproducing code is not so simple for me to read it directly as
I'm not familiar with rails and have no knowledge of factory_girl.
So, I'll frist try to follow the discussion of
https://github.com/colszowka/simplecov/issues/60.
Sorry for my sluggish action.

-- 
Yusuke Endoh <[email protected]>

In This Thread