[#39260] RubySpec vs CRuby's test/... — Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core-mailing-list@...>

Before the release of Ruby 1.9.2 it was decided that Ruby releases

59 messages 2011/09/04
[#39276] Re: RubySpec vs CRuby's test/... — "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...> 2011/09/05

2011/9/5 Marc-Andre Lafortune <[email protected]>:

[#39325] Re: RubySpec vs CRuby's test/... — Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...> 2011/09/07

I'll jump in with some context from the JRuby perspective.

[#39335] Re: RubySpec vs CRuby's test/... — "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...> 2011/09/07

2011/9/7 Charles Oliver Nutter <[email protected]>:

[#39365] Re: RubySpec vs CRuby's test/... — Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...> 2011/09/08

On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 4:17 AM, NARUSE, Yui <[email protected]> wrote:

[#39366] Re: RubySpec vs CRuby's test/... — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2011/09/08

Hi,

[#39370] Re: RubySpec vs CRuby's test/... — Michael Klishin <michael.s.klishin@...> 2011/09/08

Yukihiro Matsumoto:

[#39374] Re: RubySpec vs CRuby's test/... — "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...> 2011/09/08

(2011/09/09 1:29), Michael Klishin wrote:

[#39376] Re: RubySpec vs CRuby's test/... — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2011/09/08

On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 4:19 PM, NARUSE, Yui <[email protected]> wrote:

[#39379] Re: RubySpec vs CRuby's test/... — Masaya TARUI <tarui@...> 2011/09/08

Hello Luis,

[#39382] Re: RubySpec vs CRuby's test/... — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2011/09/08

On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 5:34 PM, Masaya TARUI <[email protected]> wrote:

[#39386] Re: RubySpec vs CRuby's test/... — Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...> 2011/09/08

On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 3:57 PM, Luis Lavena <[email protected]> wrote:

[#39267] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5273][Open] Float#round returns the wrong floats for higher precision — Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core@...>

14 messages 2011/09/04

[#39435] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5306][Open] Application Hangs Due to Recent rb_thread_select Changes — Charlie Savage <cfis@...>

27 messages 2011/09/09

[#39498] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5310][Open] Integral objects — Kenta Murata <muraken@...>

13 messages 2011/09/13

[#39539] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5321][Open] Introducing Numeric#exact? and Numeric#inexact? — Kenta Murata <muraken@...>

26 messages 2011/09/14

[#39629] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5341][Open] Add SSL session reuse to Net::HTTP — Eric Hodel <[email protected]>

18 messages 2011/09/19

[#39634] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5343][Open] Unexpected blocking behavior when interrupt Socket#accept — Tomoyuki Chikanaga <nagachika00@...>

10 messages 2011/09/20

[#39673] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5353][Open] TLS v1.0 and less - Attack on CBC mode — Martin Bosslet <Martin.Bosslet@...>

13 messages 2011/09/22

[#39700] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5364][Open] How about new syntax: "object.\method" returns a Method instance? — Joey Zhou <yimutang@...>

20 messages 2011/09/25

[#39740] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5372][Open] Promote blank? to a core protocol — Alex Young <alex@...>

18 messages 2011/09/27
[#39743] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5372][Open] Promote blank? to a core protocol — Aaron Patterson <aaron@...> 2011/09/27

On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 06:18:19PM +0900, Alex Young wrote:

[#39754] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5372][Open] Promote blank? to a core protocol — Alex Young <alex@...> 2011/09/27

On 27/09/2011 19:46, Aaron Patterson wrote:

[#39807] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5372][Open] Promote blank? to a core protocol — Eric Hodel <[email protected]> 2011/10/01

On Sep 27, 2011, at 6:52 PM, Alex Young wrote:

[#39751] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5375][Open] [mingw32] segfault on WinXP SP3 with 1.9.3dev@33347 — Jon Forums <redmine@...>

26 messages 2011/09/27

[#39772] ObjectSpace.reference_form(obj) #=> references_array — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>

Hi,

13 messages 2011/09/29
[#39774] Re: ObjectSpace.reference_form(obj) #=> references_array — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2011/09/29

Hi,

[#39796] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5384][Open] Ruby 1.9.3-RC1 Fails to Compile on Solaris — Cyrus Lopez <cyrus@...>

11 messages 2011/09/30

[ruby-core:39570] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5193] ruby_thread_data_type linker errors fixed with RUBY_EXTERN

From: Charlie Savage <cfis@...>
Date: 2011-09-16 02:32:04 UTC
List: ruby-core #39570
Issue #5193 has been updated by Charlie Savage.


> No, it keeps thread objects. But I'm not sure if allowing 
> GC is necessary. Seems a thread object will be removed
> from the table by check_thread_contexts() if the thread has
> terminated. Isn't it enough? 

Since I don't know the code, I don't the answer. Mark would be best to answer that.

> I'm uncertain of "the need". You mean that you won't
> need the header to compile ruby-debug?

Yes.  To compile ruby-debug you must have the Ruby source code installed because it refers to the headers iseq.h and vm_core.h neither of which are installed by Ruby.

It would be much better for ruby-debug to not have to use those headers and instead could just use Ruby's public api.  Don't know if that is currently possible.  If not, seems like a nice addition for 1.9.4 (I know you have mentioned work on an official debug api).
----------------------------------------
Bug #5193: ruby_thread_data_type linker errors fixed with RUBY_EXTERN
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/5193

Author: Charlie Savage
Status: Third Party's Issue
Priority: Normal
Assignee: Nobuyoshi Nakada
Category: core
Target version: 1.9.3
ruby -v: -


ruby-debug-base19x fails to compile with VC++ 2010 with this error:

ruby_debug.obj : error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol _ruby_thread_data_type

ruby_thread_data_type is declared in vm_core.h as:

extern const rb_data_type_t ruby_thread_data_type;

ruby-debug calls GetThreadPtr which is defined as:

#define GetThreadPtr(obj, ptr) \
    TypedData_Get_Struct((obj), rb_thread_t, &ruby_thread_data_type, (ptr))

What makes this interesting is that ruby_thread_data_type is properly included in the msvcr100-ruby191.def file and is exported from msvcr100-ruby191.dll.  Somehow the &ruby_thread_data_type causes problems for VC++ (mingw works correctly).  

Some Ubuntu users seem to be having a similar issue.  See:

http://rubyforge.org/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=29222&group_id=8883&atid=34290

The problem is resolved for VC++ by changing the definition to:

RUBY_EXTERN const rb_data_type_t ruby_thread_data_type;

Any chance this change could be made?

Thanks - Charlie


-- 
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org

In This Thread