[#99426] [Ruby master Bug#17098] Float#negative? reports negative zero as not negative — chris@...

Issue #17098 has been reported by chrisseaton (Chris Seaton).

12 messages 2020/08/01

[#99449] [Ruby master Bug#17100] Ractor: a proposal for new concurrent abstraction without thread-safety issues — ko1@...

Issue #17100 has been reported by ko1 (Koichi Sasada).

41 messages 2020/08/03

[#99474] [Ruby master Feature#17103] Add a :since option to ObjectSpace.dump_all — jean.boussier@...

Issue #17103 has been reported by byroot (Jean Boussier).

9 messages 2020/08/04

[#99485] [Ruby master Misc#17104] Why are interpolated string literals frozen? — bughitgithub@...

Issue #17104 has been reported by bughit (bug hit).

23 messages 2020/08/05

[#99499] [Ruby master Bug#17105] A single `return` can return to two different places in a proc inside a lambda inside a method — eregontp@...

Issue #17105 has been reported by Eregon (Benoit Daloze).

10 messages 2020/08/06

[#99582] [Ruby master Feature#17122] Add category to Warning#warn — eileencodes@...

Issue #17122 has been reported by eileencodes (Eileen Uchitelle).

20 messages 2020/08/13

[#99700] [Ruby master Bug#17129] bundle install `eventmachine` and `sassc` fails since 914b2208ab3eddec478cdc3e079e6c30d0f0892c — yasuo.honda@...

SXNzdWUgIzE3MTI5IGhhcyBiZWVuIHJlcG9ydGVkIGJ5IHlhaG9uZGEgKFlhc3VvIEhvbmRhKS4N

9 messages 2020/08/26

[ruby-core:99512] [Ruby master Feature#16461] Proc#using

From: shugo@...
Date: 2020-08-08 01:30:00 UTC
List: ruby-core #99512
Issue #16461 has been updated by shugo (Shugo Maeda).

Assignee set to matz (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
Status changed from Open to Assigned

shugo (Shugo Maeda) wrote in #note-5:
> > I think that could be a good rule, all `Proc#using` must happen `before Proc#call` for a given block.
> > That would mean the code inside a block always calls the same methods (i.e., the refinements for a given call site are fixed), which seems essential to me for sanity when reading code.
> 
> OK, I'll try to fix PoC implementation.

Sorry for the delay.
I've fixed the CRuby implementation:

https://github.com/shugo/ruby/pull/2


----------------------------------------
Feature #16461: Proc#using
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/16461#change-86970

* Author: shugo (Shugo Maeda)
* Status: Assigned
* Priority: Normal
* Assignee: matz (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
* Target version: 2.8
----------------------------------------
## Overview
I propose Proc#using to support block-level refinements.

```ruby
module IntegerDivExt
  refine Integer do
    def /(other)
      quo(other)
    end
  end
end

def instance_eval_with_integer_div_ext(obj, &block)
  block.using(IntegerDivExt) # using IntegerDivExt in the block represented by the Proc object
  obj.instance_eval(&block)
end

# necessary where blocks are defined (not where Proc#using is called)
using Proc::Refinements

p 1 / 2 #=> 0
instance_eval_with_integer_div_ext(1) do
  p self / 2 #=> (1/2)
end
p 1 / 2 #=> 0
```

## PoC implementation
For CRuby: https://github.com/shugo/ruby/pull/2
For JRuby: https://github.com/shugo/jruby/pull/1

## Background
I proposed [Feature #12086: using: option for instance_eval etc.](https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/12086) before, but it has problems:

* Thread safety: The same block can be invoked with different refinements in multiple threads, so it's hard to implement method caching.
* _exec family support: {instance,class,module}_exec cannot be supported.
* Implicit use of refinements: every blocks can be used with refinements, so there was implementation difficulty in JRuby and it has usability issue in headius's opinion.

## Solutions in this proposal

### Thread safety
Proc#using affects the block represented by the Proc object, neither the specific Proc object nor the specific block invocation.
Method calls in a block are resolved with refinements which are used by Proc#using in the block at the time.
Once all possible refinements are used in the block, there is no need to invalidate method cache anymore.

See [these tests](https://github.com/shugo/ruby/pull/2/commits/1c922614ad7d1fb43b73e195348c81da7a4546ef) to understand how it works.
Which refinements are used is depending on the order of Proc#using invocations until all Proc#using calls are finished, but eventually method calls in a block are resolved with the same refinements.

### * _exec family support
[Feature #12086](https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/12086) was an extension of _eval family, so it cannot be used with _exec family, but Proc#using is independent from _eval family, and can be used with _exec family:

```ruby
def instance_exec_with_integer_div_ext(obj, *args, &block)
  block.using(IntegerDivExt)
  obj.instance_exec(*args, &block)
end

using Proc::Refinements

p 1 / 2 #=> 0
instance_exec_with_integer_div_ext(1, 2) do |other|
  p self / other #=> (1/2)
end
p 1 / 2 #=> 0
```

### Implicit use of refinements

Proc#using can be used only if `using Proc::Refinements` is called in the scope of the block represented by the Proc object.
Otherwise, a RuntimeError is raised.

There are two reasons:

* JRuby creates a special CallSite for refinements at compile-time only when `using` is called at the scope.
* When reading programs, it may help understanding behavior.  IMHO, it may be unnecessary if libraries which uses Proc#using are well documented.

`Proc::Refinements` is a dummy module, and has no actual refinements.






-- 
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
<http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>

In This Thread

Prev Next